3 ms·

We don't have enough of it. Depending how you define and measure it, many humans don't even have it. It's extremely expensive to make more of, and it's the sing

• password54321 3y ago
  >We don't have enough of it. More like we aren't making efficient use out of it. Many people are just trying make through the rat race or choosing to use their intelligence in games instead of working on interesting problems.
• lewhoo 3y ago
  > We don't have enough of it. Enough for what ?
• bgnn 3y ago
  Well, why do we expect it will be cheaper? Looking at the power required to train LLMs one can argue that it might be more beneficial to invest that money in education of humans :')
  • charcircuit 3y ago
    >Well, why do we expect it will be cheaper? For the same reason one expects a roulette wheel to stop on red. It's a gamble that one hopes pays off.
• bmitc 3y ago
  I don't know what you mean by "this" and what should be obvious. We don't have enough of what for what? And what do we even need it for? We have 8 billion people on Earth, and we're running out of resources to handle all of them, including emotional resources. If we can't handle that, how are we going to handle billions of artificial entities with human-level intelligence? They will require oodles of power and have their own emotional needs. All of this is chasing a poisoned carrot. And currently, all that we've gotten out of artificial intelligence is more targeted ads.