password54321

3 ms·

1.
by password54321 5d ago
wtf are you on. Surgeons practice on much more than animals.
2.
by password54321 6d ago
Actually, if you were to convert most software into mathematical notation it would look incomprehensible. We are not interested in gatekeeping as much by making things look more convoluted than they need to.
3.
by password54321 6d ago
Wow, I'm glad AI is going to start humbling people.
4.
by password54321 6d ago
Do you think surgeons start performing surgery for the first time on people?
5.
by password54321 6d ago
Sounds like jobs that are the first in line to get automated by AI.
6.
by password54321 8d ago
Knowledge is neither inherently good or bad.
7.
by password54321 8d ago
"How to Win Friends and Influence People" is a book published in 1936 and talks about people who have better soft skills being more successful than those with better technical skills in the same field. This isn't anything new
8.
by password54321 8d ago
Stop doing this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument_from_authority
9.
by password54321 11d ago
If RSI is achievable, it will leapfrog everything produced so far and so it will make sense to focus on RSI instead of incremental improvements for your top model. Startups need investment and need to show progress. Google does not at the m
10.
by password54321 11d ago
None of the startups are profitable. What exactly are they getting beaten at? My advice is to listen less to brainrot 'influencers' that optimise for engagement through sensationalism.
11.
by password54321 12d ago
If it was that serious, we would be seeing a lot more action than a tweet and a blog post. I'm not even sure why the public needs to know about how "scary" AI is as we can't do much, don't know any of the technical
12.
by password54321 12d ago
Mostly title inflation. Using GPT API does not make you an "AI engineer". I don't even know if anyone would seriously call themselves this. Usually they are either software developers that actually work at an AI company or a
13.
by password54321 12d ago
I don't think you can completely eliminate this as people naturally don't like giving up their agency which is usually going to produce at least a low level of anxiety.
14.
by password54321 13d ago
Yes, they are manufacturing consent for banning open-weight models while they privately do whatever they want without sharing anything with the public except dramatic warnings.
15.
by password54321 14d ago
If you read between the lines, it was mostly about China.
16.
by password54321 14d ago
They are not going to "slow down" anyway. When has tech ever "slowed down"? The only way to "slow down" progress is by implementing anticompetitive measures, which would benefit those in lead.
17.
by password54321 15d ago
Haven't they reported "anonymous" users before to the police?
18.
by password54321 15d ago
>Damn, we hardly know who our users are No, they know who you are. 1 in 3 already use AI for mental health advice among many other things.
19.
by password54321 15d ago
Ironic. This is written from a women's perspective so it is giving the exact opposite issue majority of men have, which is they don't have much choice on the apps. I did notice however people were much more friendly on the apps in
20.
by password54321 16d ago
You don't teach people to "to use AI" you teach them to read, write and ask questions. The source it is coming from, whether it is another person, a program or a book doesn't matter much.
21.
by password54321 17d ago
There has always been snark but I swear it has been really excessive lately.
22.
by password54321 17d ago
Just "adding more layers" doesn't explain the step change. We have moved past the point you can just stack more layers and get huge gains from it. Some have called it latent space reasoning.
23.
by password54321 17d ago
It is worth noting that None performed better than Low and nearly the same as Medium on ARC3. And with adapter it still scored >96% with no CoT. So I think it is possible but it also cost them more on None.
24.
by password54321 19d ago
That's great. We are obviously both privileged enough to think that. Not so great for others.
25.
by password54321 19d ago
You are about to get replaced.
26.
by password54321 19d ago
This is just you putting your head in the sand while you gradually automate your job.
27.
by password54321 19d ago
It is really about data. The endgame is not about hoping devs give them money.
28.
by password54321 20d ago
Using tools to build tools is recursive.
29.
by password54321 20d ago
Are you deterministic? Does that make you better somehow?
30.
by password54321 2mo ago
So it probably wrote a Python script using OpenCV? That's not exactly groundbreaking and have seen o3 do this.

More ›