3 ms·
all it took was a judge declaring the SEC’s prior view toward bitcoin ETFs to be arbitrary and capricious and the SEC thinking about appealing but realizing th
by yieldcrv 3y ago
all it took was a judge declaring the SEC’s prior view toward bitcoin ETFs to be arbitrary and capricious
and the SEC thinking about appealing but realizing this absolutely based SCOTUS would delete the SEC like Thanos if they ever get taken beyond circuit appeals court by the private sector
markets win
- ur-whale 3y agobased -> biased ? [EDIT]: looks like no, saying "a based judge" actually has meaning in English.
- kasey_junk 3y agoThe Supreme Court heard arguments in November on the constitutionality of the SEC.
- yieldcrv 3y agoregarding how the SEC circumvents the 7th amendment in how they fine people regarding whether Congress even delegated that discretion to the SEC whether the 7th amendment circumvention stands or not and regarding whether their in-house, on-staff, judges can be exempt from removal there are plenty more deeper questions to bring before the supreme court, about this specific agency. this SCOTUS has expressed interest in taking out the remaining vestiges of the New Deal, which were mostly found unconstitutional in the late 1930s, with the remaining things simply being difficult to find standing for - hard to take to court. The SEC's main behaviors being one of those things. this SCOTUS has expressed interest in how the interstate commerce clause is interpreted at all, which is also a core tenant of the New Deal. Could possibly reshape our entire relationship with the Federal Government. The SEC would take the biggest L while the capital markets would be fine.
- charlie0 3y agofr... on god, this BTC ETF is bussin
- yieldcrv 3y agocommon bitcoin w