6 ms·
Epic already lost the trial in the Apple case. Courts in the US and other countries have treated Google differently as an OS provider to OEMs than Apple as a s
by scarface_74 3y ago
Epic already lost the trial in the Apple case. Courts in the US and other countries have treated Google differently as an OS provider to OEMs than Apple as a single vendor.
Would they also make Sony, Nintendo and Microsoft open up their platforms?
- aaomidi 3y ago> Would they also make Sony, Nintendo and Microsoft open up their platforms? God I hope so.
- threeseed 3y agoIt would be terrible for consoles. They would not be able to recover their costs early enough in the lifecycle. Which means that the time between console releases would be much longer than it already is. It also would put Nintendo in an untenable situation since they rely on low price hardware as their differentiation.
- raincole 3y agoThe would be the end of consoles. At this point consoles have very few advantages to PC. If they got "opened up" it would be zero.
- ethbr1 3y agoIt's just look a lot more like a standardized PC. Which they they probably should by this point.
- raincole 3y agoPerhaps Steam Deck model is actually the future of the consoles...
- threeseed 3y agoSure. But there would be zero incentive for Sony, Nintendo etc to build one. Because Acer, Asus etc could simply come along and undercut them on price and still have access to the exact same game catalog. And then they would each decide to add more proprietary features or add more performance. And so you've just recreated the PC gaming market again.
- wdwind 3y ago> And so you've just recreated the PC gaming market again. What's the issue with that?
- scarface_74 3y agoReally? What’s the issue for not having a known target to optimize for?
- TillE 3y agoThat hasn't been a serious issue for 20 years. The overwhelming majority of big games are now being released for PC on day one, the only exceptions being platform exclusives and Rockstar games. Developers certainly have no problem making PC games.
- scarface_74 3y agoI can go to a store today and buy a Sony PS5 and know that it will play every game designed it for with the same quality as any other PS5. Can you say the same about buying any PC? Will that be true for any game you buy for the next five years?
- MBCook 3y agoYou’re right. I can’t wait until I can’t play games on my PlayStation because I forgot to install audio driver update 2.367 which conflicts with rendering update 7.829. That will be a much better experience for me as a consumer. There is no need to open up consoles. You don’t have to buy them. The PC is incredibly healthy as a gaming platform. Please let people like me who want to gaming appliance have it without screwing it up.
- tavavex 3y agoOpening up a platform doesn't mean that it suddenly has to be cross-compatible with everything else. It just means that software that is written for your platform is no longer under full control of the manufacturer. Why wouldn't you want things like accessible emulators, some control over the OS, more games in general (since developers no longer have to invest thousands into licensing and proprietary software) and much more? Besides, even if someone somehow forced, say, PlayStation to be cross-compatible with other platforms for some reason - it's not like the issues you described are exactly plaguing PCs nowadays. With very rare exceptions (like ancient or heavily modded games), the experience is pretty much "Press 'Play' on your launcher of choice -> Play game".
- teaearlgraycold 3y agoA beautiful future
- malfist 3y agoThat isn't a bad thing for customers.
- aaomidi 3y agoAll I’m hearing is we’d significantly reduce ewaste and force consoles to compete to keep themselves relevant by not allowing them a monopoly.
- scarface_74 3y agoAnd this is why posters on HN make horrible lawyers. How is a market with three competitors, four if you count PCs and even more if you count phones “a monopoly”? Btw, the judge in the Apple case said that Apple doesn’t have a monopoly in game distribution
- LordKeren 3y agoI don’t think Nintendo has ever sold consoles at a per-unit loss. It would actually probably help them since it would raise the cost of Sony and Microsoft’s offerings even higher over theirs
- threeseed 3y agoNo but they make a lot of money through licensing and Nintendo Store sales. That would all disappear if you could side-load any content.
- Dylan16807 3y agoDoes "side-load any content" mean unlimited piracy? Otherwise I don't understand your argument at all. But adding side-loading does not enable unlimited piracy.
- threeseed 3y agoPiracy isn't the issue here. It's the fact that Nintendo, Sony etc wouldn't be able to enforce any licensing revenue since users could just install any game directly. For Nintendo it would decimate the company since it's their primary revenue stream.
- Dylan16807 3y agoLook at all the games that are sold through Steam, just for convenience and stability. I think the benefit of being in the Nintendo store is far higher than that, and they'd do fine. And they have lots of first party games too.
- TillE 3y agoNintendo makes a ton of money on first-party games, and they could easily continue releasing their games exclusively on their consoles. They'd lose very little. Random sideloaded games are just irrelevant when people are buying the systems for Zelda and Pokemon.
- nerdix 3y agoSo Google is punished because they made their platform more open. Well, that certainly will bode well for the future.
- LordKeren 3y agoThey got punished for paying companies off to not compete on their open platform
- nerdix 3y agoBut they are the ones that allowed those companies to compete in the first place. And I'm not saying that they should have won. Both Apple and Google losing would have been the best outcome. However, Google losing and Apple winning is the worst. Because its makes open platforms even less attractive to businesses.
- LordKeren 3y agoUnfortunately, apple’s position as both phone manufacturer, iOS manufacturer, and App Store maintainer resulted in them being able to successfully argue that their control over the App Store was a feature that was expected by users and was needed to maintain a smooth and secure operating ecosystem Google, on the other hand, just got pilloried because they are not the phone manufacturer (for the most post), but instead were using their position as the producers of android to pressure phone manufacturers and companies to not compete. Their own internal docs showed the extreme lengths they were willing to go to stop companies from producing third party apps stores. It was this stifling of completion that just got them reamed by the court
- hackernewds 3y agoif you zoom out you find that Google got published for allowing other manufacturers into their Android system while Apple benefited from keeping ios closed to themselves. how does this serve the consumers ultimately
- clhodapp 3y agoWhy shouldn't they? I know for sure that if it were possible to sideload software onto my Switch or PS5, that would definitely benefit me as a consumer. The fact that I have a reasonably powerful computer attached to my TV but can't install software on it without convincing Sony to sell me a janky dev kit for way too much money is just wasteful. Just about the only objection I can imagine is "piracy", but the locked-down nature of these platforms has surely not stopped piracy from occurring. Nor has piracy caused the failure of Valve's game store or the downfall of their gaming hardware.
- MBCook 3y agoBut that’s not something you get through a jury. There are no laws saying that’s necessary. You need a new law to say that. Google got in trouble for saying that you could do something and then secretly undermining it. Whether or not third-party app stores were allowed on devices was not the core issue.
- scarface_74 3y agoIf only you could buy a “powerful computer” to attach to your TV where you could download software from anywhere…
- adam_arthur 3y agoEpic vs Apple is not over, it's being appealed to the US Supreme Court. And this Google case is likely to end up there as well. I suspect they'll end up ruling in favor of Epic, in some limited fashion. But let's see!