4 ms·
The Australian dream of owning a house is dead in Australia. Only rich people and corporations can afford to buy houses.
by andrewstuart 3y ago
The Australian dream of owning a house is dead in Australia.
Only rich people and corporations can afford to buy houses.
- fader 3y agoIndeed, see e.g. https://www.theguardian.com/inequality/2023/nov/25/generational-wealth-gap-study-monash-old-to-young-debt-repayments-savings-rates https://www.theguardian.com/inequality/2023/nov/25/generatio...
- tjpnz 3y agoSame in New Zealand actually. As a longterm resident of Japan it would be cheaper to buy a brand new apartment in the middle of Tokyo than it would some damp hovel in Auckland.
- bushbaba 3y agoCould be good news for Japan if they allow for easier immigration.
- ipaddr 3y agoEvery country that does has this housing problem.
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- robocat 3y agoAuckland is expensive partially due to immigration. Auckland region[1]: The proportion of people born overseas was 41.0%, compared with 27.1% nationally. When over 1/3 of the population is immigrants that causes housing demand. Fabulous "Upzoning New Zealand" article on NZ housing policy: https://worksinprogress.co/issue/upzoning-new-zealand/ https://worksinprogress.co/issue/upzoning-new-zealand/ which mentions Auckland increased housing supply by 4% from 2016 to 2021. It also mentions large house supply growth in Christchurch and how house prices have been going up in Christchurch despite that. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Auckland_Region https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Auckland_Region
- mistermann 3y agoSame in Canada also, and rent is ability the same. The number of formerly or currently middle class homeless people in the near future is going to be a sight to behold.
- dalyons 3y agoits imho subtly worse... rich people, corporations, and children of older people who already own homes. There's a _lot_ of the last group, and its dividing society into two large segments with a widening gap in between, based on nothing but luck of who you were born to.
- sneed_chucker 3y ago> its dividing society into two large segments with a widening gap in between, based on nothing but luck of who you were born to. Same as it ever was.
- dalyons 3y agoSort of. True that throughout history, if you were born to the top very small % of ruling/landed class then you had it easy. This is a much larger chunk of society though, perhaps ~50% that will be permanently generationally better off than the other 50%
- frumper 3y agoIt sounds like you've just made the case that today's society is significantly better off than previous ones.
- Nursie 3y agoI'm not sure it's dead. It's certainly under pressure, but here in Perth I can find a few hundred properties under $400k, and banks will lend a working couple both on full-time minimum wage over $400k. Yes, they'd have to find a deposit somewhere (though something like keystart can help with lower deposit requirements). Sure, not all of them are houses (a minority are), there are a lot of villas and apartments in there, not all are in the best areas etc. etc. Perhaps we can say it's on life support here. Over east may be a different story of course, which is probably why we have so many posts in the Perth subreddit about moving to Perth...
- canada_dry 3y agoAnd from what I understand renters have little/no rights or recourse against greedy landlords (i.e. compared to most G7 countries) who can demand rent increases and/or toss out tenants for very little reason.