3 ms·
In support of anti-CSAM efforts, please. I might think they're horrible people, but they don't support child porn.
by dvdkon 3y ago
In support of anti-CSAM efforts, please. I might think they're horrible people, but they don't support child porn.
- Someone1234 3y agoAren't they a group of people using anti-CP as a way to profit or build a moat? They're essentially looking to mandate scanning, and then selling the tools to do so or making it harder for competition to enter their segments.
- ethbr1 3y agoParent's point was that the phrasing indicates they support child sexual abuse material. Which I think it's fair to say that, whatever their motivations and misguided goals, they do not.
- GartzenDeHaes 3y agoThey have a financial incentive for CP to exist, organically or otherwise.
- mulmen 3y agoThey absolutely do support CSAM. They depend on it in the same way Chevron depends on the existence of crude oil. This has never been about minimizing harm to children. It has always been a cynical power play.
- isodev 3y agoYou're right, titles are hard - I made an edit.
- mulmen 3y agoNo. The headline is correct. These people are in favor of CSAM-as-an-issue. These unfathomably stupid measures have never been about minimizing harm to children. They have always been about power and money.