10 ms·
I consider myself very lucky to be born in this age of civilization where technology increases at such incredible pace. Playing games on an atari in my childhoo
by htk 3y ago
I consider myself very lucky to be born in this age of civilization where technology increases at such incredible pace. Playing games on an atari in my childhood, then sega master system, nintendo, snes, pc games, the first 3d acceleration consumer cards, all the way to having a supercomputer in my pocket. What a time to be alive.
- Mistletoe 3y agoUnfortunately this hasn’t resulted in people being more happy. It’s quite the paradox. What are we doing all this for? https://news.gallup.com/poll/505745/depression-rates-reach-new-highs.aspx https://news.gallup.com/poll/505745/depression-rates-reach-n... I don’t post that to be negative, because I agree with what you are saying about a unique time to be alive and have done the same Atari to Xbox Series X glow-up and I marvel at the improvements there. But I do think happiness (and decreased mortality, increased lifespan) should be the ultimate end goal we are striving for for humanity and we seem to be failing, at least in the USA. The reasons are certainly multifaceted, but increased transistor density may be one of the reasons just like obesity, environmental toxins, etc.
- willis936 3y agoSecurity. Nature owes nothing to anything. Even the warmest bosom in the cosmos (Earth) is hostile, temperamental, and temporary. If the death of one individual is a tragedy then I don't know the right word to describe the termination of life.
- justinator 3y agoOr the false sense of security.
- willis936 3y agoWhat is false about it? Are you arguing that we are less secure against nature while sitting in climate controlled buildings with food stores in them, and a global industrial complex raised to keep these trains running?
- justinator 3y agoI have never lived in a world where there was not the existential threat of nuclear annihilation in every minute of every hour of every day of my life. But you're right: I'm not going to get lost in my own city - or yours - because I have an iPhone in my pocket. I may never really learn my city and all its hidden little secrets you find only by wandering around, but I'll be efficient getting to the bar in a "climate controlled buildings" where I'll just stare at the iPhone some more and not really talk to anyone, as that's what everyone is doing, too. "It is a world suited for monomaniacs obsessed with the idea of progress - but a false progress, a progress which stinks. It is a world cluttered with useless objects which men and women, in order to be exploited and degraded, are taught to regard as useful ... Whatever does not lend itself to being bought or sold ... is debarred" –Henry Miller, The Air-Conditioned Nightmare
- wiseowise 3y ago> but I'll be efficient getting to the bar in a "climate controlled buildings" where I'll just stare at the iPhone some more and not really talk to anyone, as that's what everyone is doing, too. Sometimes I wonder if internet people are living in parallel universe. I see literally opposite, wherever I go, of what people like you describe.
- justinator 3y agoWell you're spending your Sunday staring at a screen on a venture capitalist's message board, having contributed nine comments in the last 24 hours. Where are you right now, exactly?
- barsonme 3y agoThis is incredibly myopic and ungrateful. Thanks to technology, we don’t have to try and have eight kids—losing half of them at a young age—just so that we don’t lose the farm and starve. Thanks to technology, millions of children are protected from diseases that years ago they would’ve died from. But sure, blame technology for your lack of self control causing you to stare at your phone at bars.
- Etheryte 3y agoLeaving aside issues caused by social media etc, this always seems like an odd take to me. Why do you expect technology to make people happier? I mean, cars have gotten drastically better since their inception, but I don't really expect my car to make me happy, much like I don't expect the insulation of my house to make me happy, or the x-ray machine my doc uses to make my life a happy one. I think technological development is a completely separate axis to happiness, you can be technologically stagnant and happy or advancing and happy, you can be standing still and sad and moving forwards and sad.
- accrual 3y ago> I don't really expect my car to make me happy, much like I don't expect the insulation of my house to make me happy, or the x-ray machine my doc uses to make my life a happy one I think this is valid for most people. But as I've tried to integrate more gratitude into my life, I've noticed that it is possible to feel happiness from these things. I find it all too easy to disregard many of the things I have because they've always been there and available. But as soon as I don't have some of my comforts (being outside in the cold, camping and batteries are dying, my car needs an unexpected repair, a pain in my arm that I can't treat myself, etc.), it becomes easier to realize just now nice things really are.
- st-keller 3y agoIs it really happyness we should strive for? I hear this over and over without anyone challenging this. Maybe a meaningful live is more fulfilling than a happy one? If i remember Nitzsche correctly: „No one strives for happiness - only the englishman does!“
- jprete 3y agoI don’t think tech comes out better on this scale than the happiness one.
- amelius 3y agoPerhaps people are happy when they are using their tech, but in normal life they feel depressed.
- thatguysaguy 3y ago[dead]
- moh_maya 3y agoAt some level, I think this is orthogonal to technological progress. One possible way of getting at this is to ask if people were more ‘happy’ when there wasn’t this level of tech available - and I’m not sure the answer is yes - I mean, there’s the mythos of ‘a simple life’ and ‘noble savages’, but from what I’ve read of life even a 100 years back - I would surmise folks were as unhappy / miserable then too - but likely for different reasons. I think expecting just tech to make us happy is framing the wrong problem space.
- agumonkey 3y agobut existence influences choices so technological progress in itself, regardless of its use, is a consideration
- edgyquant 3y agoMaybe happy isn’t the right word, but I think it’s pretty clear people were more content and felt a sense of purpose. Social media has made things worse, but it’s really the loss of community and religion that has led to the crisis of loneliness and depression among todays people.
- eropple 3y ago> I think it’s pretty clear people were more content and felt a sense of purpose From what available data would you derive this and not immediately question selection bias?
- pests 3y ago> but I think it’s pretty clear [...] Is it? Because that is not clear to me in the slightest.
- jwells89 3y agoModern loneliness is a far more multifaceted issue than it’s often presented as. For instance I’m sure that a major factor is the need for people to move great distances away from family and the community they grew up in to be able to find education, living wages, and other forms of opportunity. That breaks existing connections and makes it harder to form new ones, but I never see that talked about.
- docfort 3y agoBread is a great invention and a staple for many across the world. People have grown better at the process of developing grass into ever more productive wheat crops, transforming the inedible into something people find comfort in. But yes, there’s also an element of bread and circuses. Technology is not enough. It is not orthogonal to happiness, as you point out, but having the best bread doesn’t fundamentally make the course of humanity better. That begins and ends with what we individually and collectively choose: technology merely enhances our will.
- calvinmorrison 3y agoSome technology does and some doesn't. A washing machine is a fantastic piece of machinery you could even build on a small scale that saves hard labor A patent by Sony that forces the TV viewer to stand up and lift their hands and say "McDonalds!" to continue watching TV, is not
- agumonkey 3y agoI think there's reverted or diminishing returns.. a 400MHz svga was generational, now a prosumer pocket supercalculator quickly goes meh, very odd to observe
- downWidOutaFite 3y agoThe book Sapiens argues that tech has made us less happy ever since the invention of farming 10,000 years ago, the hunter gatherers were happier and healthier than the farm villagers. But since tech allows the population density to grow we get stuck in "the luxury trap", we can't go backwards or a bunch of people will die. And the unhappier larger village is more powerful than the hunter gatherers so they have an evolutionary advantage. I think you could apply a similar theory to the modern capitalist world.
- gary_0 3y agoOn the one hand, I love the idea of living a slower-paced, less competitive life. Most humans ending up crammed into urban rat-races is a horrible outcome. On the other hand, I like not dying in agony of easily treatable diseases. I like that the vast majority of people in developed countries have zero chance of dying of malnutrition. Having to choose between one or the other would suck. I wonder if we can have both?
- pests 3y agoNothing is stopping you from living a slower-paced, less competitive life right now, today. While still getting all the benefits of society being advanced enough to not die in agony of easily treatable diseases.
- vachina 3y agoI cannot sleep well at night knowing my neighbor just upgraded his Porsche.
- wiseowise 3y ago> healthier than the farm villagers. I would like to see some data comparing modern, fit worker against average hunter gatherer.
- bobsmooth 3y agoIdk man, air conditioning makes me very happy.
- FredPret 3y agoWhat does happiness have to do with material progress? There are happy monks and unhappy billionaires. Humanity must push forward on all fronts.
- robertlagrant 3y agoHappiness is relative. Paris Hilton might feel distraught if her credit card is declined, if that's the worst thing that's ever happened to her. That's why it's important to understand context, both local and historical, to understand our place in the world and how we should feel about it.
- n3150n 3y agoReminded me of this great literary article I read not too long ago, detailing some of the story behind the TMSC factory of semiconductors. Truly a marvelous read, if you are interested. https://www.wired.com/story/i-saw-the-face-of-god-in-a-tsmc-factory/ https://www.wired.com/story/i-saw-the-face-of-god-in-a-tsmc-...
- scarface_74 3y agoI think it is more amazing that we went from the Wright brothers in 1903 to landing on the moon in 1969.
- samwillis 3y agoAnd we haven't been back in 50 years, despite all the incredible technology improvements. The Apollo guidance computers had "several tens of thousands of transistors"[0], we now have 19 billion in our pocket! 0: https://www.aei.org/technology-and-innovation/apollo-11-mankind-and-moores-law/#:~:text=The%20two%20Apollo%20Guidance%20Computers,tens%20of%20thousands%20of%20transistors https://www.aei.org/technology-and-innovation/apollo-11-mank....
- scarface_74 3y agoI think “For All Mankind” is a great “What If” show about what things would be like if we had kept pushing forward. The thing about the series though was that NASA was self funded and didn’t have to justify spending billions in taxpayer money. Also, do we really have better propulsion technology to make space travel more efficient?
- jacquesm 3y agoImagine if all of the worlds armament budgets were instead rerouted to science and space travel...
- Waterluvian 3y agoFor me it was the experience of being a teenager for both Half Life 1 and 2 and the brilliant and mad rush of GPU improvements in such a short amount of time.
- permo-w 3y agochange and power do not necessarily make one happy
- corethree 3y agoI think we're unlucky. I think the next generation or a couple generations down the line they will figure out biological immortality. If you're immortal the sum total of things you will see in your lifetime will dwarf the experience you're having now.
- huytersd 3y agoI agree. I feel like we missed immortality by a few decades to a hundred years at the most. We might be some of the last generations that actually have to die.
- ben_w 3y agoI don't know which generation you're in, but I do remember people saying in the late 00s, that the first person to live to 200 had likely already been born, we just didn't know how old they were.
- kaba0 3y agoAnd what will we do with immortality? Our organs will continue to deteriorate, especially the brain. Many older people are already quite gullible and easy to feed propaganda to, being a favored target to politicians, let alone someone 90+.
- ben_w 3y agoIf you think that's a necessary part of immortality, you're looking at fiction inspired by the ancient Greek tale of Eos and Tithonus and not, for example, SENS: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strategies_for_engineered_negligible_senescence https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strategies_for_engineered_negl...
- corethree 3y agoThat deterioration is what eventually causes death so immortality involves removing said deterioration. I'm short Immortality is achieved by stopping aging.
- Daz1 3y agoCapitalism is amazing :)
- this15testing1 3y agoif you can willfully ignore exploitation and externalities