4 ms·

What causes all of these papers published on github without code?

echelon 3y ago
Massive receptive AI audience. The papers published on GitHub are typically presented in a much more accessible and beautiful way than arXiv. The downstream social traction is further signal and affirmation for your results, lab, and/or company.
smusamashah 3y ago
There is also Zero123++ which seems to be doing the same thing but has code available https://github.com/SUDO-AI-3D/zero123plus https://github.com/SUDO-AI-3D/zero123plus EDIT: Just realized this one only outputs multiple images which are 3D consistent, not a 3d model.
- rprenger 3y ago
  I believe Zero123++ gives you the ability to generate consistent images from multiple camera views, where as DreamCraft3D seems to output 3D models with geometry and textures if I'm understanding it right. Like I could take the output of DreamCraft3D (if I had the code) and drop the result into Blender for example.
T-A 3y ago
It is not unusual for code release to follow paper release with a lag of days to weeks. The top priority for a researcher is to get the paper out. Code is supporting material of secondary importance.
livrem 3y ago
I was wondering why all of those papers have PDF downloads with the most useless, non-descriptive, names. > Paper_high_res.pdf
- menacingly 3y ago
  Probably the same kind of oversight that just allowed me to compile hundreds of books in a catalog each as "book.pdf" It was on exactly the second download where I realized how restrictive my choice of namespace was
- corysama 3y ago
  The authors aren't thinking about you when they name the 87th revision of their paper.pdf They just want to get some sleep.
- alok-g 3y ago
  I used to give descriptive names to directories that would each carry a main document, and associated materials like references, diagrams, etc. Since the directory already had a descriptive name, I used to name the main document like "-- paper.docx" so that it stays on top when sorting the files by name. However, realizing the problem you have mentioned, I started giving descriptive names to the main document also, in most cases by re-using the name given to the directory, still adding the leading "--".
scoopertrooper 3y ago
The fourth line of the readme > Code will come soon.
- reactordev 3y ago
  Proof is in the pudding, so to speak.

Massive receptive AI audience. The papers published on GitHub are typically presented in a much more accessible and beautiful way than arXiv. The downstream social traction is further signal and affirmation for your results, lab, and/or company.

smusamashah 3y ago

There is also Zero123++ which seems to be doing the same thing but has code available https://github.com/SUDO-AI-3D/zero123plus https://github.com/SUDO-AI-3D/zero123plus EDIT: Just realized this one only outputs multiple images which are 3D consistent, not a 3d model.

rprenger 3y ago
I believe Zero123++ gives you the ability to generate consistent images from multiple camera views, where as DreamCraft3D seems to output 3D models with geometry and textures if I'm understanding it right. Like I could take the output of DreamCraft3D (if I had the code) and drop the result into Blender for example.

T-A 3y ago

It is not unusual for code release to follow paper release with a lag of days to weeks. The top priority for a researcher is to get the paper out. Code is supporting material of secondary importance.

livrem 3y ago

I was wondering why all of those papers have PDF downloads with the most useless, non-descriptive, names. > Paper_high_res.pdf

menacingly 3y ago
Probably the same kind of oversight that just allowed me to compile hundreds of books in a catalog each as "book.pdf" It was on exactly the second download where I realized how restrictive my choice of namespace was
corysama 3y ago
The authors aren't thinking about you when they name the 87th revision of their paper.pdf They just want to get some sleep.
alok-g 3y ago
I used to give descriptive names to directories that would each carry a main document, and associated materials like references, diagrams, etc. Since the directory already had a descriptive name, I used to name the main document like "-- paper.docx" so that it stays on top when sorting the files by name. However, realizing the problem you have mentioned, I started giving descriptive names to the main document also, in most cases by re-using the name given to the directory, still adding the leading "--".

scoopertrooper 3y ago

The fourth line of the readme > Code will come soon.

reactordev 3y ago
Proof is in the pudding, so to speak.