4 ms·
Good article - which captures the chaos that is San Francisco today. But probably completely confuses anyone who doesn't live there. Let me add some more illus
by creer 3y ago
Good article - which captures the chaos that is San Francisco today. But probably completely confuses anyone who doesn't live there.
Let me add some more illustrations of chaos:
- Around Market and 9th to 11th, a mostly residential and expensive main and small streets, the noise is not that of the homeless in the street (of which there are many). It's mostly the INSANE level of noise of firefighters and ambulances. Second is the noise of the oh-so-touristic tramways. By contrast in the Mission the problem is the noise of the homeless shouting at each other and playing music in the street - early, all day, late. Firefighters and ambulances are rather quiet and much less frequent.
- "safest it has ever been". WTF? It has been years since people bothered to report "non-violent crime" such as smashing car windows for kicks and giggles. (There is an online system where you can get a number if you really need one for your insurance, without inconveniencing too many people.) And my friends and I have stopped even reporting most violent crime. Because what's the point? My score is now at 4 physical assaults and uncounted (because who has even the time) verbal ones. A friend has a better score but also uncounted: "every time I leave the apartment".
- Meanwhile, some neighborhoods are perfectly civilized: Usually no homeless and no poop on the sidewalks (dog or human), peaceful, construction work is discreet. No police in sight (same as mostly anywhere). If these people mostly live in these neighborhoods, they don't have anything to complain about.
- "millions!!! [...] for extra police overtime". Not for hiring, mind you. Just for paying cops to stands around doing nothing more profitably. Which is a double edged thing anyway: It's dangerous when SF cops DO something. For all the "progressiveness" of the city, many minorities don't feel safe when the cops are around. Some events actively ask the participants to NOT call the cops if something happens - because it would only aggravate the situation for the people who do belong there.
- It can be hard to get the official service to pick up trash for you. But on the other hand you can just leave stuff on the sidewalk and most will disappear fast. That's convenient. /s
- "too much ideology. Not enough action." There is a lot of that. Not just from the government.
- Transit. Great, right? There is a decent density of public transit in San Francisco. That should be good, right? Yes and no: It's slow. It's very often not on time - sometimes missing entirely. It sometimes isn't safe. It often doesn't feel safe. It's often disgusting. And even the giant busses sometimes have a hard time navigating the potholes.
- "The city has an annual budget of fifteen billion dollars". Really? I didn't know that. Funny. The web says $6.4B in 2010, $14.6B in 2023-2024. Amazing. So much money for so little result.
- Street cleaning. SF uses "street cleaning" as a pretext for parking tickets largely. On some streets, the street sweeper zooms through at warp speed, in the middle of the street, after the ticket brigade came through, and then you can park again. Elsewhere, the sweeper assiduously scrubs this way and that again - beautiful.
So anyway, chaos. And good luck San Francisco!
What can fix it? Beats me. Not one thing certainly. Less red tape of course, less corruption of course (of every kind including not doing one's job or using one's job as a platform for ones' obsessions), less infighting no doubt wouldn't hurt, more voting probably (but this is California, running on a platform "for housing" means absolutely nothing in practice.)
Oh: The weather is great. Hard to beat really depending on your preferences.
- creer 3y agoActually there is something that might help everywhere in California: That would be to rebuild a state-run or state-funded mental health system at all levels and at a size that could actually make a difference. Ideally at the state level but perhaps San Francisco can help get that started.
- seanmcdirmid 3y agoIt is really hard for a city to bootstrap mental health system given that people can just move to SF for great mental health care if the system is actually decent (saturating the system and eventually causing it to collapse). We already see this with happening cities with better social services than others.
- dangus 3y agoThe flaw with your comment is that you could pretty much post it in any city’s subreddit or discussion forum and it would be a common trope. There’s always a bloc of people who believe that everything has gotten out of hand these days, everything is chaos, things were better back in the good old days. It’s unproductive bitter nonsense. Then they go on and complain about the bloated city budget without doing any research on why that is. In San Francisco, many revenue generating agencies that normally aren’t part of city government feed income into the budget, like the Port of San Francisco, which makes the budget look bigger overall. It has departments that in other cities might be part of county or state government instead. Also, San Francisco is legally required to balance their budget. I’d like to say that my advice to bitter city forum members would be to just move already and get it over with, but we all know they’d spend their time complaining about the next place they’re living.
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- mortify 3y agoWhen municipalities share problems, it's possible that many of them are experiencing them for the same reasons. It certainly doesn't mean the problems don't exist.