3 ms·
Agreed, there is no excuse to veto this just because some future project could potentially alleviate it later. Bring relief now.
by aforty 3y ago
Agreed, there is no excuse to veto this just because some future project could potentially alleviate it later. Bring relief now.
- Supermancho 3y agoThere is an excuse. Political capital. It's not an excuse that is compelling, but this is Newsom. He's a Democrat that is trying to hold on to power for as long as he can, however he can.
- jupp0r 3y agoHe wants to run for president in 2028, not hold on to power.
- Supermancho 3y agoYour comment makes no sense to me. It just doesn't track. Either he can parlay with pharma and point to how he kicked the bill, or he has to make excuses for not kicking the bill (regardless if he runs 2028 or not). It's political capital. It's power.
- nradov 3y agoThe point is that in the run up to the 2028 presidential campaign, Newsom isn't going to take any major actions which might alienate large swing voting blocs or major campaign donors (such as pharmaceutical companies). Unfortunately, low-income insulin dependant diabetics aren't a major political factor so regardless of what Newsom says in public, their needs aren't a priority for him.
- pauldenton 3y agoPerhaps not solving the problem simply by allowing mexican medication, like New York doesn't simply solve pharmaceutical prices by importing Canadian drugs and keeping drug prices high in the present with promises of future fixes is a form of parlaying with Pharmaceutical companies
- wredue 3y agoGood thing that’s not why it was vetoed.
- frankreyes 3y agoYou're missing the point. The insulin is the point. And the insulin is still expensive. It would be easier to just import it from the border, either Mexico or Canada.
- wredue 3y agoHa. So lie and then when called on the lie, presume the person who called out the lie is “missing the point”. Goalposts, rocket mode, launch!
- frankreyes 3y agoIs the insulin cheaper now? No.