Supermancho

4 ms·

1.
by Supermancho 5d ago
Your narrative is repeated less and less because it isnt compelling. My narrative is substantially different because the trend was correct and 1.4 vs 2.0 does not prove a negative. The massive FUD and misinformation campaigns by industriali
2.
by Supermancho 9d ago
The term "harness" here is being overloaded for the term "agent", which is worrying. Putting that aside, there are many factors that matter. The "harness" context, the execution pattern (parallel vs sequential)
3.
by Supermancho 10d ago
What Trump says is never clear. It's also not a reliable source for what behavior the administration (or even he) exhibits.
4.
by Supermancho 10d ago
> he caused a large part of it for unclear reasons Technically it was Besset, but Trump gave him the reigns. The purpose seems to be to radically debase the dollar and setup a crises that requires an entitlement cut (Social Security) for
5.
by Supermancho 11d ago
Rings that can't be adjusted are ubiquitous. Walk into almost any store that sells rings, most open-air stands that sell rings, and you will find some. It's true they aren't usually preferred, but they are common.
6.
by Supermancho 11d ago
None of these 3 problems have anything to do with it being a smart ring. Same problems that regular rings have, yet people still wear them. 1. Adulting: buying rings that are the right size. eg My tungsten wedding ring cannot be resized eit
7.
by Supermancho 14d ago
> Actually sorry, it's beyond absurd. So is Fox News. That's the OVERT propaganda.
8.
by Supermancho 14d ago
If someone believed he committed even a portion of the crimes attributed to him and his associates, it follows that someone would have to believe he had firsthand knowledge. There's no reason to believe he would kill himself while stil
9.
by Supermancho 14d ago
Without a doubt, this material has been scrubbed and censored and altered. There are no lengths to which this administration (or any other) would go to, to safeguard publishing material that might be used against them or their associates. T
10.
by Supermancho 15d ago
The shadow of Chesterton's Fence is relevant. The LLM doesn't know why code exists, if it doesnt start traversing up the scope of a project. Even then, it can't be sure that the code isn't a dependency of something else
11.
by Supermancho 15d ago
> Efficiency, security, maintainability, reliability, readability, understandability, extensibility, maintainability, observability, portability My experience is a little different. For higher abstraction languages the output is largely
12.
by Supermancho 16d ago
> "we all stopped coding manually around December 2025", as if AI critics don't exist. It was obviously a generalization. The number of AI critics (which eschew AI for coding) are a minority. I would say tiny minority at t
13.
by Supermancho 17d ago
> Private citizens filming in public and police forces setting up arrays of surveillance cameras in public somehow don’t seem equivalent. The reason these strategies (for the same goal) don't seem equivalent is due to the nature of
14.
by Supermancho 17d ago
> Most of the current discourse around AI seems to be informed by “The Terminator” lore. I am thinking it's more like The Matrix lore of The Second Renaissance from Animatrix.
15.
by Supermancho 18d ago
As I look back to after the Kuwait defense, the attack on Iraq and forward stopped making sense because US leadership didn't explain the rationale. Politicians didn't want to get caught up in the problematic history of dealing wit
16.
by Supermancho 20d ago
Copilot has enterprise controls. Its not open source. This is the easiest integration and large companies are eating it up as the path of least friction, using API cost calls. I call BS.
17.
by Supermancho 20d ago
> If the mere act of eating a staple food item causes so many carbon emissions it contributes to planetary-scale climate change, you have an overpopulation problem. That is incorrect. If there is one person who produces the same amount
18.
by Supermancho 21d ago
> The president's job is to be the dumb unthinking agent of Congress Execution will never be as simple as the textual content of a bill, so I'm not sure 'mindless' is a useful term. While the POTUS is expected to be a
19.
by Supermancho 21d ago
The demographic collapse was a forgine conclusion in the 80s. There is no global overpopulation problem over the next century. There will be food shortages due to a lack of labor and dessicated farmland. It will be rough for the average hum
20.
by Supermancho 22d ago
I can agree that poor people break the law more often. Not "are convicted of" but the acts. I think the reasons are obvious and unrelated to the point of the study. Desperation, culture (broken window theory) which is critically r
21.
by Supermancho 22d ago
Anti-capitalism does not automatically qualify as communism. Notably, if IP were to be abolished, it doesn't belong to anyone. The expectation that open anything includes some sort of DRM-like content gating is counterproductive.
22.
by Supermancho 22d ago
No need to engage with bad faith premises. You cant convince someone who is invested in their own FUD.
23.
by Supermancho 22d ago
> The frontend is less risky to just hand to an agent. The smaller the problem, the less risky it is to do this, regardless of the nature of the problem. This is not a frontend-specific issue today.
24.
by Supermancho 23d ago
> Did humans deploy the model, Or did the model deploy itself? > It sounds like "AGI" just stands for "IPO" as it always has been. People don't usually respond to noise.
25.
by Supermancho 23d ago
Netflix link above, is correct. SNL parody https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VhGTtWsW9F8
26.
by Supermancho 23d ago
or worse, Dublin.
27.
by Supermancho 23d ago
> "a random birth is far more likely to fall near the present" is correct, If the selection is from the population at random (as the UI indicates), but it specifically says it's based on a random year (during which humans
28.
by Supermancho 24d ago
Aside from the fact that Matt Pocock spends a lot of time with LLMS (only Claude really), he has a hand-wavy approach to engineering in a silo. He then uses that output as a foundation for other tools, while touting them as the best way to
29.
by Supermancho 24d ago
> they don't trust the generated code because it doesn't pass their process That's not a credible scenario. Developers can either make changes by hand, or by asking an LLM, which is the common process when there is a downs
30.
by Supermancho 25d ago
> the message appears to be correct. "in shambles because of AI" no. It's the same as it always was.

More ›