4 ms·

> People can actually invoke shapes and colors in their minds. Please can some of you chime in. I have never been able to picture things and I don't have a voi

> People can actually invoke shapes and colors in their minds. Please can some of you chime in. I have never been able to picture things and I don't have a voice in my head. Do you? I assumed my way is the norm, it's weird finding out that it might not be. What does picturing things even look like, is there a floating object in front of you? On the voice thing I saw a Reddit thread where people were expressing surprise that some people don't have an inner voice when they read or think.

bnt 3y ago
I can’t picture objects or colour, but have vivid dreams. Also it’s normal for me to hold conversations with myself in my head. Post-covid I had a few days with no inner “voice” and it was terribly lonely.
pbhjpbhj 3y ago
Couple of search terms: aphantasia, subvocalisation. These topics have come up here a few times, I see they're doing the rounds on Facebook atm.
- politelemon 3y ago
  Thanks, I think I'll be going down some Wikipedia holes this afternoon.
AdammadA 3y ago
May i ask out of curiosity. Do you see dreams? I personally can see shapes if i concentrate while im awake and close my eyes and can spin them around like looking at a 3D model in some kind of viewer for instance. It's not perfect and how long i can hold that mental image for depends. I can do this with my eyes open too, similar to augmented reality but much fuzzier and again limited to the length of time i can hold that image for in my mind. I'm more of an artist than a coder, but do both. I find it harder to code than i find creating 2D or 3D objects in something like blender for instance. But visually i can mental map nodes etc. to assist me in coding. As for voices, inner monologue or attaching voices to comments i read is pretty much natural thing for myself. I assume we all did that to some degree but clearly not. It's interesting how we see our world and understand it. In your case it must be different. I'm intrigued really how you make sense of things without visually creating associations in the mind etc.
- politelemon 3y ago
  I very rarely dream, but I have had dreams, and definitely seen people, places, things in there. So I think I have relegated shapes/colors/visuals to just dreams. Clearly I am wrong. Wait, does this mean daydreaming is people actually seeing things? Do you daydream? When I daydream I like to create 'what if' scenarios and follow them to conclusions. > and close my eyes and can spin them around like looking at a 3D model in some kind of viewer for instance. > But visually i can mental map nodes etc. to assist me in coding. This is amazing! I've daydreamed (ha!) about having an ability to render objects in my head and manipulate them like a computer but you already do that. I'm not exaggerating when I say I'm envious. I'm not artistic, just a normal software person.
  - episteme 3y ago
    > Wait, does this mean daydreaming is people actually seeing things? Yes, they are usually seeing similarly to seeing in a dream. Seeing with the minds eye as they say. You don't usually lose awareness of your surroundings, what you are seeing in reality just becomes more of a background process while you visualise a daydream.
    - politelemon 3y ago
      Thank you for sharing... today feels like having a 'life altering' view. I think this will also help me relate to and work with people around me when presenting, remembering, etc. in terms of expectations.
  - checkyoursudo 3y ago
    So I am in this middle ground, where like you I cannot for the life of me actively picture anything in my mind's eye. I close my eyes and it is black, blank, and lifeless. My wife, for example, can close her eyes and recall my face perfectly. I have read about some artists being able to essentially trace what they are picturing in their mind's eye, though it seems that some incredibly talented and famous artists also have had aphantasia! Anyway, the middle ground for me is that despite not being able to conjure vivid (or any) mental imagery, I have vivid dreams and daydreams. So it seems that if I am tired or my mind is wandering, some mental canvas unlocks, but not while I am alter and paying attention.
nilsherzig 3y ago
Let's take a spinning cube as an example. I don't see it "in front of me" or as an overlay on top of my vision (I can do this tho, it's just not the default and I have to concentrate to create such an overlay). It's hard to describe, I can just see the cube and as soon as I try to focus on the soundings (to find out if there are any) they start to exist but they don't until I focus on them. Imagine a videogame rendering engine, which only renders things the player is actively looking at, not just the field of view, but just the smallest possible point of focus.
mathieuh 3y ago
I can picture things in two ways: I can picture whole scenes, or I can imagine something existing in my vision, like I can imagine a ball lying on the floor or I can imagine a painting hanging on the wall. In both cases the pictured thing definitely feels more internal than what my eyes are perceiving. So it’s not quite like I’m superimposing a floating object in front of me on top of my vision, it’s like a post-processing filter or something. It definitely doesn’t feel like my eyes are seeing whatever I’m picturing, it feels like it’s happening inside my head.
lordnacho 3y ago
Well yeah. You know what a light sabre looks like, right? Now hold your hand out and see yourself holding a light sabre. Hear the wum-wum sound. How did you play imaginary games as a kid? Voice in your head. What happens when you read a play? Don't see a guy holding a skull, talking about slings and arrows? Like a movie. If there's a sudden sound to one side, you turn your actual head that way. In fact the movie analogy is the best description. I can see video of everything I imagine, in fact it's pretty much what imagination is to me. You see yourself winning the race? There you are, breaking the rope, Chariots of Fire playing as you slowly push your chest forward. I do this with math as well. Geometry questions, I can move the lines around. Algebra, I can move the symbols around. To a limited degree of course, I need paper for anything complicated. But it's useful in a way that's hard to describe, because you can't explain it in words, you need to show someone the video with the constrained shape, eg a circle with a diameter and a point that moves on the circle, showing that wherever the point is there's always a 90 degree angle. Smells, I don't often imagine. Mostly they are stenches and I prefer not to.
- politelemon 3y ago
  I didn't play imaginary games I assume if I had visualization capabilities I probably would have! No, no voice either, and while reading I'm not visualize anyone doing anything, it's more of a "thing is happening, I understand". I do enjoy a lot of books though, I am able to read almost 100 fiction books per year. I do want to say your writing and prose is so vivid and amazing, the way you're describing what's going on is rich and beautiful.
  - lordnacho 3y ago
    Thank you. Those 100 fiction books a year... don't you turn them into a movie in your head? Part of the reason I'm not so keen on fiction is that there's not quite enough to make a movie, or too much. If I get a description of some guy in a book either I have to fill in his costume with some random clothes that aren't described, or I have to remember every little detail. Inevitably I forget something and the movie makes no sense. Do you dream? That's kinda what movies in my head are like. Stuff has some form but is also partially fluid.
quitit 3y ago
I work with a range of people who do and don't possess the ability to visualise and have to change how I work with them accordingly. (To learn more about this field, look into Aphantasia.) For example if I say: "it's the same as this (while holding up a production sample), but in blue plastic" I have one person who I work with who will need to see a picture of it to understand that, while others are simply "yep ok", and some people a bit in between. For me personally, I can visualise an object, change it, rotate it, recolour/reskin parts of it, interact with it etc. all in my mind without any special effort. In terms of my work this means I tend to do it anywhere and not in front of my tools or software. This kind of visualisation isn't limited to images, a composer friend can "play" and "hear" music, doing nothing more than reading the sheet music and moving his hands on a table - no where near a piano. He can practice while laying on a beach for example. Also as a trend: I notice people who lack the ability to visualise are more easily fooled by edited imagery. Especially the recent-ish trend of making a body slender or larger by use of "facetune"/"liquify" style tools. I make it a matter of importance to understand how a person "learns" very quickly as I notice this has a definite effect on their ability to work and follow direction.
- imkehno 3y ago
  As a someone who can visualize a lot of things and enjoys cooking and fine-dining - I’ve also noticed that I can visualize the look, taste and smell of the end result from the raw components. So, when given a set of ingredients I start by visualizing the different combinations, picking out one and then refining it whilst cooking. And the same applies the other way around, when blind-tasting some sauces or foods. I get a mental imagery of the components from the taste, not 100% obviously but usually it’s pretty accurate.
TerrifiedMouse 3y ago
> What does picturing things even look like, is there a floating object in front of you? For me it’s like switching to another reality.* I can reproduce actual reality in the alt reality of my mind’s eye if necessary. I have noticed some limitations though. I have trouble imagining altered faces - e.g. it’s hard for me to remove a facial feature; I guess I don’t know what to replace it with and would need to study human faces to determine a replacement. But maybe it’s just me. * That’s what people do when they are daydreaming.
csydas 3y ago
I can somewhat do this, but I think that the idea is overstated in many people's perceptions -- that is, it's not that I can always clearly see anything in my mind or hear or smell things in my mind, it's only in specific situations and specific moods. I enjoy cooking for example, and if I really like a meal somewhere, I can slowly start to break down the components that provide the taste, the smell, even the texture (i.e., cooking techniques) for the meal. Music is a bit easier for me even without a ton of familiarity, but I can hear the notes quite easily in my mind, scale them and find their "friends" (not sure what the real musical term is), I just lack the physical ability to hit some of the notes in my mind. The point of this is that it's not an omnipresent feature for everyone, and I'm willing to bet it's much more isolated as I'm describing, but I don't insist that I'm accurate in this bet. I don't think that I really trained for this directly, at least not in all subjects -- I did play an instrument as a child, and while I couldn't recite the different scales or tell you which notes to play by name, I could just show you with my instrument because it "sounded" right in my head, and if my teacher corrected me and showed me, it was easy enough after awhile to "hear" the right note in advance. With visualizing items, again it's nothing that I would train on and it's not something I do all the time, but it does happen; remembering directions to some place in my city I might just give the basic directions without thinking of what it looks like, but if someone is unfamiliar with my city, I can "see" the various places they'll spot on the way, almost to the point it's like going on a walk in my mind through this place. The visualizations typically start out very amorphous for me unless I'm _very_ familiar with the subject; usually only a few vague aspects of the image appear, and as I remember other details, the picture becomes more clear. It's maybe a bad example, but imagine watching a painting come together one layer at a time, or a Timelapse of an artist doing a painting. Or maybe some game where only part of the image is shown at first with some blurring or distortion, and over time (as I think of more details), it becomes more clear.
boricj 3y ago
I've been thinking about it for a couple of minutes and here's the best description I can make in computer terms. For sight, it's a cross between off-screen rendering and overlay rendering. It doesn't feel like part of the world around me and it's not part of the streaming surface my eyes see so to speak. It's like a separate, independent layer that gets "halfway-composed", but with a stencil buffer that tells me it's not real. Bandwidth is restricted by focus, I can imagine and animate visually complex scenes but the more constraints I put in the harder it is to keep track of everything and not have a rendering glitch or artifact. If I want to picture something specifically as part of my field of view (part of the world I'm seeing with my eyes), it's overlaid, but somewhat glitchy or ghostly and skipping frames, like it doesn't belong there. For audio, I can replay, remix, compose, "infinite jukebox" and essentially deep-fake anything I've ever heard and it's overlaid on top of what I hear. Unlike for visuals there's no stencil buffer, so I can't tell the difference (except that it doesn't correlate with other senses, like loud noises rumbling your body for example). By default it's in mono, making it stereo or directional takes a significant effort. That processor tends to have a mind of its own sometimes and is vulnerable to earworms, like an infinite jukebox that just won't stop playing. Controls can be a bit iffy, like music seeking having trouble if it's not to a position that's correctly aligned or music "skipping" if I have trouble switching over to the next part of the song. Finally, the act of imagining something is like ordering my subconscious with an AI prompt, but without text. Sometimes it decides to imagine stuff I didn't order or screws up what I've ordered, which can make me twitch a bit if it's something unexpected and that I don't approve of and need to actively suppress. If I'm particularly tired or stressed out, my brain can have trouble distinguishing between a real stimuli and a fake one, so I guess that's effectively hallucinations, but usually like echoes or corner-of-the-eye stuff rather than full-blown lala-land.
gsich 3y ago
Start a conversation with yourself outloud and finish it in your mind. That is your "inner" voice.
nocsi 3y ago
Check out /r/hyperphantasia. I’m between a 2/3 on the scale and can visualize anything with a slight grayish hue. It’s not just visuals either, I can remember smells and reexperience it. The best way to describe it is like a kind of out of body experience where your mind goes somewhere else. It’s a separate plane of existence, like an astral projection. It’s a nice evolutionary quirk that was probably necessary in survivalist times. The whole future thinking aspect of it probably stopped early humans from demise. Otherwise if you really wanted to know what hyperphantasia is like, I think there are drugs that would give a similar experience.
- taneq 3y ago
  This… isn’t normal?
  - leon_theremin 3y ago
    What is being described here is a result of outside electromagnetic waves being used to influence his nervous system. Humanity is already under electromagnetic surveillance and sabotage and our science and tech is hindered so we can't defend ourselves. Religion is organized fraud to prevent scientific progress, but attacks with radiation are done to scientists also. Read my posts.
ck425 3y ago
The voice thing still surprises me. I have a constant monologue and I honestly can't separate that from "thinking". I was always aware mine was more random/silly/manic than most and likely faster, basically a chatter box that won't shut up vs the calmer "can stop and listen" type voice I presumed normal brains have. But I struggle to imagine not having an inner voice at all. I have brief moments if I'm really in the zone or absorbed by a book or a film where it quietens or fades away but as soon as I actively think anything it's immediately back. Is it not really boring not having one? Like how do you talk to yourself to think things through? Can you even do that? If it's not obvious I have ADHD, specifically inattentive, so getting lost in my thoughts is my default state. On the picturing things side, I don't know how to describe it. I can just imagine objects, models, layouts etc in my mind and turn around like in modelling software. It's completely separate to my vision, the images are in my "mind's eye" or mental space and it doesn't have anymore impact on my visual awareness than any other kind of thinking. I can take the models from my mind and overlay them on my sight but it takes much more concentration to imagine things that way. It's easier to build/edit in my mind and then check against vision. I'm also better at certain types of mental picturing than others. Visuospatial thing like floor plans, 3D models, visualising a street route etc are easy and natural for me. Colour I can do to an extent but it's harder and I need to reference reality more. 2D is a little harder than 3D, no idea why. Non technical images like art are harder too. Though that could just be the 2D thing as technical images are easy to imagine 3D. Landscapes and faces are easier too now I think of it which backs that up. I learned early on not everyone can do it. We had Tech classes in S1-2 of high school (11-13) where we learned 3D technical drawing. It made immediate sense to me, I just turned the object in my head and drew it from different perspectives. But I learned that wasn't something most of my classmates could just naturally do. Lots of them learned it with practise but it took a while and some of them just couldn't do it.
drcongo 3y ago
I can't visualise anything at all, but I have multiple inner voices constantly chatting, often to each other rather than me. It's infuriating at times, but also the only thing I've ever known. I'm incredibly jealous of people without an inner voice.

bnt 3y ago

I can’t picture objects or colour, but have vivid dreams. Also it’s normal for me to hold conversations with myself in my head. Post-covid I had a few days with no inner “voice” and it was terribly lonely.

pbhjpbhj 3y ago

Couple of search terms: aphantasia, subvocalisation. These topics have come up here a few times, I see they're doing the rounds on Facebook atm.

politelemon 3y ago
Thanks, I think I'll be going down some Wikipedia holes this afternoon.

AdammadA 3y ago

May i ask out of curiosity. Do you see dreams? I personally can see shapes if i concentrate while im awake and close my eyes and can spin them around like looking at a 3D model in some kind of viewer for instance. It's not perfect and how long i can hold that mental image for depends. I can do this with my eyes open too, similar to augmented reality but much fuzzier and again limited to the length of time i can hold that image for in my mind. I'm more of an artist than a coder, but do both. I find it harder to code than i find creating 2D or 3D objects in something like blender for instance. But visually i can mental map nodes etc. to assist me in coding. As for voices, inner monologue or attaching voices to comments i read is pretty much natural thing for myself. I assume we all did that to some degree but clearly not. It's interesting how we see our world and understand it. In your case it must be different. I'm intrigued really how you make sense of things without visually creating associations in the mind etc.

politelemon 3y ago
I very rarely dream, but I have had dreams, and definitely seen people, places, things in there. So I think I have relegated shapes/colors/visuals to just dreams. Clearly I am wrong. Wait, does this mean daydreaming is people actually seeing things? Do you daydream? When I daydream I like to create 'what if' scenarios and follow them to conclusions. > and close my eyes and can spin them around like looking at a 3D model in some kind of viewer for instance. > But visually i can mental map nodes etc. to assist me in coding. This is amazing! I've daydreamed (ha!) about having an ability to render objects in my head and manipulate them like a computer but you already do that. I'm not exaggerating when I say I'm envious. I'm not artistic, just a normal software person.
- episteme 3y ago
  > Wait, does this mean daydreaming is people actually seeing things? Yes, they are usually seeing similarly to seeing in a dream. Seeing with the minds eye as they say. You don't usually lose awareness of your surroundings, what you are seeing in reality just becomes more of a background process while you visualise a daydream.
  - politelemon 3y ago
    Thank you for sharing... today feels like having a 'life altering' view. I think this will also help me relate to and work with people around me when presenting, remembering, etc. in terms of expectations.
- checkyoursudo 3y ago
  So I am in this middle ground, where like you I cannot for the life of me actively picture anything in my mind's eye. I close my eyes and it is black, blank, and lifeless. My wife, for example, can close her eyes and recall my face perfectly. I have read about some artists being able to essentially trace what they are picturing in their mind's eye, though it seems that some incredibly talented and famous artists also have had aphantasia! Anyway, the middle ground for me is that despite not being able to conjure vivid (or any) mental imagery, I have vivid dreams and daydreams. So it seems that if I am tired or my mind is wandering, some mental canvas unlocks, but not while I am alter and paying attention.

nilsherzig 3y ago

Let's take a spinning cube as an example. I don't see it "in front of me" or as an overlay on top of my vision (I can do this tho, it's just not the default and I have to concentrate to create such an overlay). It's hard to describe, I can just see the cube and as soon as I try to focus on the soundings (to find out if there are any) they start to exist but they don't until I focus on them. Imagine a videogame rendering engine, which only renders things the player is actively looking at, not just the field of view, but just the smallest possible point of focus.

mathieuh 3y ago

I can picture things in two ways: I can picture whole scenes, or I can imagine something existing in my vision, like I can imagine a ball lying on the floor or I can imagine a painting hanging on the wall. In both cases the pictured thing definitely feels more internal than what my eyes are perceiving. So it’s not quite like I’m superimposing a floating object in front of me on top of my vision, it’s like a post-processing filter or something. It definitely doesn’t feel like my eyes are seeing whatever I’m picturing, it feels like it’s happening inside my head.

lordnacho 3y ago

Well yeah. You know what a light sabre looks like, right? Now hold your hand out and see yourself holding a light sabre. Hear the wum-wum sound. How did you play imaginary games as a kid? Voice in your head. What happens when you read a play? Don't see a guy holding a skull, talking about slings and arrows? Like a movie. If there's a sudden sound to one side, you turn your actual head that way. In fact the movie analogy is the best description. I can see video of everything I imagine, in fact it's pretty much what imagination is to me. You see yourself winning the race? There you are, breaking the rope, Chariots of Fire playing as you slowly push your chest forward. I do this with math as well. Geometry questions, I can move the lines around. Algebra, I can move the symbols around. To a limited degree of course, I need paper for anything complicated. But it's useful in a way that's hard to describe, because you can't explain it in words, you need to show someone the video with the constrained shape, eg a circle with a diameter and a point that moves on the circle, showing that wherever the point is there's always a 90 degree angle. Smells, I don't often imagine. Mostly they are stenches and I prefer not to.

politelemon 3y ago
I didn't play imaginary games I assume if I had visualization capabilities I probably would have! No, no voice either, and while reading I'm not visualize anyone doing anything, it's more of a "thing is happening, I understand". I do enjoy a lot of books though, I am able to read almost 100 fiction books per year. I do want to say your writing and prose is so vivid and amazing, the way you're describing what's going on is rich and beautiful.
- lordnacho 3y ago
  Thank you. Those 100 fiction books a year... don't you turn them into a movie in your head? Part of the reason I'm not so keen on fiction is that there's not quite enough to make a movie, or too much. If I get a description of some guy in a book either I have to fill in his costume with some random clothes that aren't described, or I have to remember every little detail. Inevitably I forget something and the movie makes no sense. Do you dream? That's kinda what movies in my head are like. Stuff has some form but is also partially fluid.

quitit 3y ago

I work with a range of people who do and don't possess the ability to visualise and have to change how I work with them accordingly. (To learn more about this field, look into Aphantasia.) For example if I say: "it's the same as this (while holding up a production sample), but in blue plastic" I have one person who I work with who will need to see a picture of it to understand that, while others are simply "yep ok", and some people a bit in between. For me personally, I can visualise an object, change it, rotate it, recolour/reskin parts of it, interact with it etc. all in my mind without any special effort. In terms of my work this means I tend to do it anywhere and not in front of my tools or software. This kind of visualisation isn't limited to images, a composer friend can "play" and "hear" music, doing nothing more than reading the sheet music and moving his hands on a table - no where near a piano. He can practice while laying on a beach for example. Also as a trend: I notice people who lack the ability to visualise are more easily fooled by edited imagery. Especially the recent-ish trend of making a body slender or larger by use of "facetune"/"liquify" style tools. I make it a matter of importance to understand how a person "learns" very quickly as I notice this has a definite effect on their ability to work and follow direction.

imkehno 3y ago
As a someone who can visualize a lot of things and enjoys cooking and fine-dining - I’ve also noticed that I can visualize the look, taste and smell of the end result from the raw components. So, when given a set of ingredients I start by visualizing the different combinations, picking out one and then refining it whilst cooking. And the same applies the other way around, when blind-tasting some sauces or foods. I get a mental imagery of the components from the taste, not 100% obviously but usually it’s pretty accurate.

TerrifiedMouse 3y ago

> What does picturing things even look like, is there a floating object in front of you? For me it’s like switching to another reality.* I can reproduce actual reality in the alt reality of my mind’s eye if necessary. I have noticed some limitations though. I have trouble imagining altered faces - e.g. it’s hard for me to remove a facial feature; I guess I don’t know what to replace it with and would need to study human faces to determine a replacement. But maybe it’s just me. * That’s what people do when they are daydreaming.

csydas 3y ago

I can somewhat do this, but I think that the idea is overstated in many people's perceptions -- that is, it's not that I can always clearly see anything in my mind or hear or smell things in my mind, it's only in specific situations and specific moods. I enjoy cooking for example, and if I really like a meal somewhere, I can slowly start to break down the components that provide the taste, the smell, even the texture (i.e., cooking techniques) for the meal. Music is a bit easier for me even without a ton of familiarity, but I can hear the notes quite easily in my mind, scale them and find their "friends" (not sure what the real musical term is), I just lack the physical ability to hit some of the notes in my mind. The point of this is that it's not an omnipresent feature for everyone, and I'm willing to bet it's much more isolated as I'm describing, but I don't insist that I'm accurate in this bet. I don't think that I really trained for this directly, at least not in all subjects -- I did play an instrument as a child, and while I couldn't recite the different scales or tell you which notes to play by name, I could just show you with my instrument because it "sounded" right in my head, and if my teacher corrected me and showed me, it was easy enough after awhile to "hear" the right note in advance. With visualizing items, again it's nothing that I would train on and it's not something I do all the time, but it does happen; remembering directions to some place in my city I might just give the basic directions without thinking of what it looks like, but if someone is unfamiliar with my city, I can "see" the various places they'll spot on the way, almost to the point it's like going on a walk in my mind through this place. The visualizations typically start out very amorphous for me unless I'm _very_ familiar with the subject; usually only a few vague aspects of the image appear, and as I remember other details, the picture becomes more clear. It's maybe a bad example, but imagine watching a painting come together one layer at a time, or a Timelapse of an artist doing a painting. Or maybe some game where only part of the image is shown at first with some blurring or distortion, and over time (as I think of more details), it becomes more clear.

boricj 3y ago

I've been thinking about it for a couple of minutes and here's the best description I can make in computer terms. For sight, it's a cross between off-screen rendering and overlay rendering. It doesn't feel like part of the world around me and it's not part of the streaming surface my eyes see so to speak. It's like a separate, independent layer that gets "halfway-composed", but with a stencil buffer that tells me it's not real. Bandwidth is restricted by focus, I can imagine and animate visually complex scenes but the more constraints I put in the harder it is to keep track of everything and not have a rendering glitch or artifact. If I want to picture something specifically as part of my field of view (part of the world I'm seeing with my eyes), it's overlaid, but somewhat glitchy or ghostly and skipping frames, like it doesn't belong there. For audio, I can replay, remix, compose, "infinite jukebox" and essentially deep-fake anything I've ever heard and it's overlaid on top of what I hear. Unlike for visuals there's no stencil buffer, so I can't tell the difference (except that it doesn't correlate with other senses, like loud noises rumbling your body for example). By default it's in mono, making it stereo or directional takes a significant effort. That processor tends to have a mind of its own sometimes and is vulnerable to earworms, like an infinite jukebox that just won't stop playing. Controls can be a bit iffy, like music seeking having trouble if it's not to a position that's correctly aligned or music "skipping" if I have trouble switching over to the next part of the song. Finally, the act of imagining something is like ordering my subconscious with an AI prompt, but without text. Sometimes it decides to imagine stuff I didn't order or screws up what I've ordered, which can make me twitch a bit if it's something unexpected and that I don't approve of and need to actively suppress. If I'm particularly tired or stressed out, my brain can have trouble distinguishing between a real stimuli and a fake one, so I guess that's effectively hallucinations, but usually like echoes or corner-of-the-eye stuff rather than full-blown lala-land.

gsich 3y ago

Start a conversation with yourself outloud and finish it in your mind. That is your "inner" voice.

nocsi 3y ago

Check out /r/hyperphantasia. I’m between a 2/3 on the scale and can visualize anything with a slight grayish hue. It’s not just visuals either, I can remember smells and reexperience it. The best way to describe it is like a kind of out of body experience where your mind goes somewhere else. It’s a separate plane of existence, like an astral projection. It’s a nice evolutionary quirk that was probably necessary in survivalist times. The whole future thinking aspect of it probably stopped early humans from demise. Otherwise if you really wanted to know what hyperphantasia is like, I think there are drugs that would give a similar experience.

taneq 3y ago
This… isn’t normal?
- leon_theremin 3y ago
  What is being described here is a result of outside electromagnetic waves being used to influence his nervous system. Humanity is already under electromagnetic surveillance and sabotage and our science and tech is hindered so we can't defend ourselves. Religion is organized fraud to prevent scientific progress, but attacks with radiation are done to scientists also. Read my posts.

ck425 3y ago

The voice thing still surprises me. I have a constant monologue and I honestly can't separate that from "thinking". I was always aware mine was more random/silly/manic than most and likely faster, basically a chatter box that won't shut up vs the calmer "can stop and listen" type voice I presumed normal brains have. But I struggle to imagine not having an inner voice at all. I have brief moments if I'm really in the zone or absorbed by a book or a film where it quietens or fades away but as soon as I actively think anything it's immediately back. Is it not really boring not having one? Like how do you talk to yourself to think things through? Can you even do that? If it's not obvious I have ADHD, specifically inattentive, so getting lost in my thoughts is my default state. On the picturing things side, I don't know how to describe it. I can just imagine objects, models, layouts etc in my mind and turn around like in modelling software. It's completely separate to my vision, the images are in my "mind's eye" or mental space and it doesn't have anymore impact on my visual awareness than any other kind of thinking. I can take the models from my mind and overlay them on my sight but it takes much more concentration to imagine things that way. It's easier to build/edit in my mind and then check against vision. I'm also better at certain types of mental picturing than others. Visuospatial thing like floor plans, 3D models, visualising a street route etc are easy and natural for me. Colour I can do to an extent but it's harder and I need to reference reality more. 2D is a little harder than 3D, no idea why. Non technical images like art are harder too. Though that could just be the 2D thing as technical images are easy to imagine 3D. Landscapes and faces are easier too now I think of it which backs that up. I learned early on not everyone can do it. We had Tech classes in S1-2 of high school (11-13) where we learned 3D technical drawing. It made immediate sense to me, I just turned the object in my head and drew it from different perspectives. But I learned that wasn't something most of my classmates could just naturally do. Lots of them learned it with practise but it took a while and some of them just couldn't do it.

drcongo 3y ago

I can't visualise anything at all, but I have multiple inner voices constantly chatting, often to each other rather than me. It's infuriating at times, but also the only thing I've ever known. I'm incredibly jealous of people without an inner voice.