2 ms·
If there is anything in R that is better, it could be ported. It's kind of different from language intrinsics that can't be easily ported. In fact I think the
by dekhn 3y ago
If there is anything in R that is better, it could be ported. It's kind of different from language intrinsics that can't be easily ported. In fact I think there's a great argument for writing a standardized data processing and visual representation layer in C++, and then making it usable from all the languages.
It would be nice if this was true for the notebook layer.
- disgruntledphd2 3y agoIt's the domain knowledge that's difficult. Like the example up thread about the lack of generalised additive models. The version in R was written originally by the developers of the method. There's no Python version because no one with sufficient expertise has ported it. Don't get me wrong, I know mostly write Python because it's a better general purpose language but there are big big tradeoffs.