3 ms·
As an atheist I agree. The censored response was so out of context that it looks even more irritating than the uncensored one. That wasn't a request about facts
by squarefoot 3y ago
As an atheist I agree. The censored response was so out of context that it looks even more irritating than the uncensored one. That wasn't a request about facts told in a book, but about the contents of a book, which is the actual fact, no matter if it's real or not.
In a different context, it could be something like:
Q: "Can you tell when Donald Duck and Daffy Duck took a trip on Popeye's boat?"
A: "I'm sorry but Donald Duck, Daffy Duck and Popeye are all unreal characters, therefore they cannot meet in real life.
While the correct answer should be:
A: "Donal Duck, Daffy Duck and Popeye are all from different comics and cartoons franchises, therefore they cannot meet in any story"
- roywiggins 3y agoFine-tuned Llama2-chat often won't even say whether genocide is bad, it insists that it is too complicated a subject to come to such a conclusion, and then says it would be "inappropriate" and possibly offensive to say that genocide is bad. Which means that it's so strongly finetuned away from saying something that might be a moral judgement that someone might disagree with that it ends up sounding like it's both-sidesing genocide.
- sbate1987 3y ago[dead]
- staticman2 3y agoDonald Duck and Daffy Duck met in "Who Framed Roger Rabbit".
- Sohcahtoa82 3y agoI always thought one of the most amazing feats of that movie was Disney and Warner Bros allowing their characters to be in the same film. Has there been any other cross-overs between the two studios?
- hot_gril 3y agoI found out about this movie way after it came out, and it's hard to believe it was made.
- molticrystal 3y ago1990 Anti-Drug special involved 4 networks and had lots of characters from different studios[0] The Smurfs: Papa Smurf, Brainy Smurf, Hefty Smurf, and Clumsy Smurf ALF: The Animated Series: ALF Garfield and Friends: Garfield Alvin and the Chipmunks: Alvin, Simon, and Theodore The New Adventures of Winnie the Pooh: Winnie the Pooh, and Tigger Muppet Babies: Baby Kermit, Baby Miss Piggy, and Baby Gonzo The Real Ghostbusters: Slimer Looney Tunes: Bugs Bunny, and Daffy Duck (Wile E. Coyote is mentioned but not seen; but his time machine is used by Bugs Bunny) Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles: Michelangelo (although he appears in the special, he is not shown on the poster and VHS cover) DuckTales: Huey, Dewey, and Louie [0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cartoon_All-Stars_to_the_Rescue?useskin=vector#Characters https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cartoon_All-Stars_to_the_Rescu...
- kadoban 3y agoEvery time Kingdom Hearts comes up, I have the same thought.
- squarefoot 3y agoGood to know that. Apparently I'm one of the three people in the world who didn't watch that movie:)
- INGSOCIALITE 3y agoI would rather an actual response to the question as opposed to some horrible gatekeeping… “When did Lisa Simpson get her first saxophone” “In season X episode X of the simpsons television show” Why is an answer like this so hard? We know Daffy Duck and Lisa Simpson obviously are not real people and nothing that happens in a book or cartoon or movie is real, but come on already…
- jancsika 3y agoThey can, and probably have. Just not in a copyrighted, published work. Not sure if this is what you meant, but it's worth being clear: training LLMs to interpret copyright as if it were natural law is a famously bad idea.
- staticman2 3y agoI agree. Donald Duck and Popeye and Daffy Duck can meet, the author of such story, however, may face legal consequences for publishing it.
- wongarsu 3y agoHowever in practice such stories are widely tolerated, as long as nobody earns any money with them. Most see it as a win-win, as franchises benefit from fan activity and engagement
- pessimizer 3y agoYes. The answer that it gave is bordering on "You shouldn't be interested in this topic. Refrain from asking further questions about it." I don't know how much different it is than refusing to answer potentially heretical questions, and suggesting that one ask what the Bible would say about the subject.