8 ms·

As someone who's bought many RPi-like boards and clones let me tell you: Minor differences in price/performance are unimportant. There's another factor that's

As someone who's bought many RPi-like boards and clones let me tell you: Minor differences in price/performance are unimportant. There's another factor that's so much more important it makes boards like the Beaglebone and RPi seem like ultra high performance bargains in comparison: Software/kernel support. Every goddamned RPi-like SBC seems to require a very, very specific version of the Linux kernel that has been patched to hell and back. Almost always bundled with binary blobs/firmware that only work with that very specific version of the kernel. None of these patches get upstreamed and the binary blobs/ultra proprietary who-knows-wtf-its-doing required firmware never get updated after the release. This means that you'll be stuck with whatever version of the kernel that shipped with the device forever. Complete with all the bugs and vulnerabilities that get discovered later. Never again! Either the vendor needs a history of staying on top of things or they need to make some serious promises about upstreaming kernel patches and drivers. Example of a terrible SBC vendor you should never buy from: Orange. All the OrangePi SBCs are exactly as I described. You can expect any bug or security issue that exists at release to be a problem with that board forever. They will never get fixed. They might release an update or two within a few months of release (if it's real bad) but that's all you'll ever get.

magios 3y ago
i agree, that is a problem, mainline linux and working drm, that is direct rendering manager, drivers should exist before release of the product.
bagels 3y ago
Beaglebone Black is used in industrial applications. At scale, those price differences add up.
- cozzyd 3y ago
  yes, especially because there is an industrial variant that works down to -40 C. We use them in our detectors in Greenland. rpi's sometimes work at low temperatures, but are not spec'd for it (plus they use tons of power compared to the BBB).
  - bagels 3y ago
    Yes, for the application I used them in, we were concerned about both the upper and lower limits (heat from operation + cold when turned off in the winter). Outdoor installation, with hundreds of units per site.
joezydeco 3y ago
As someone that has actually shipped RPi-like boards and clones, I'll tell you that it's just part of the job description. They ALL suck, some just suck less than others. Broadcom, Renesas? The worst. ST, NXP, TI? Slightly better than fully sucking. Look to the chipmaker (ST, NXP) and not the board maker (Orange) for a guide in how well things go.
- colechristensen 3y ago
  But the RPi is broadcom and arguably the best supported. Obviously this is special. From experience I agree with you, the chipmakers suck because they utterly fail to be open source when they're one of the groups that needs it the most. It is to the extent that I would advocate for laws in the theme of right-to-repair to force chip vendors to provide source for necessary code to use their products to consumers. (in this case open source in the narrowest definition, they can keep their copyrights but would be required to distribute source to end users in a form and with a license that makes them usable) If the question is "are any of the SBCs worth the trouble?" and the default answer is no unless I have a really good reason and want to dedicate the time to building the janky software stack (I don't), or they're from a small list of vendors I'd trust won't be a mess (RPi, nvidia, beagle, ... that's it off the top of my head)
  - joezydeco 3y ago
    Were the kernel and BSP improvements and ongoing support for RPi produced by Broadcom, or by the user community?
    - colechristensen 3y ago
      There is some sort of close relationship between Broadcom and the raspberry pi foundation which is not entirely clear, they are a bit more than just customers although companies use the “partnership” label to mean just about anything.
      - joezydeco 3y ago
eek2121 3y ago
The VisionFive 2 developers are working on getting things upstreamed/open-sourced for their board. IIRC the kernel has already mainlined many (if not all) of the patches. Some of the real issues are as follows: 1) Most companies use Debian as a base. Debian has a notoriously slow release cycle. This means it takes loads of time to submit patches -> get approval -> get merged in a merge window -> wait for debian to use new kernel with new code. 2) The GPU situation is a mess. No decent (compatible) vendors with open source GPU drivers exist. Imagination is said to be working on open source drivers, but with no real release date, we are stuck using closed source blobs. Once drivers and Mesa get updated, we then have to wait for a new release of Debian to pick these up. 3) Far fewer people use these boards over a Raspberry Pi. This means community support takes longer to develop. The VF2 has other distros like Arch and Ubuntu, for example, but no real active community behind them. Last I checked, hardware GPU acceleration was not working in these distros.
bitwize 3y ago
I keep saying, the first cheap Chinese manufacturer that ships a SystemReady board is going to slaughter the competition.
jona-f 3y ago
Wait, I used OrangePi's with Allwinner chips before precisely cause of their cheap price and mainline linux support. At the time (~5 years ago) Rpi was worse, foss-wise. Here is a wiki documenting the efforts: https://linux-sunxi.org/Linux_mainlining_effort https://linux-sunxi.org/Linux_mainlining_effort What am i missing?
- Cyder 3y ago
  i use orangepi prime boards in production as remote NIDS. i used Armbian (a great debian porting project that does what the maker should have done ) until orange released their Debian 10 img. I put an endurance rated sdcard in those pis and they run like the little pink bunny! Love these little orangepis. I have tried a handful of other boards ( beagle, raspberry, banana , have a whole stack. too many to remember) but the oranges are solid. On a lot of these little SoCs, you can use the raspberry pi gpio software since many of these boards follow the same gpio standard & plug in/out.
imtringued 3y ago
> There's another factor that's so much more important [...]: Software/kernel support. Vision Five 2 it is then
Kadin 3y ago
I agree with everything except I don't think I would have called out OrangePi as the worst of the lot -- at least not anymore. They seem to have basically outsourced their software maintenance to Armbian, and if that relationship holds it's probably a win-win. Armbian's build system is really nice, IMO. FriendlyElec are borderline; they make nice hardware but definitely seem to take a "here's a kernel we got to boot once, good luck!" attitude towards software support. Some of their boards are supported by Armbian but often without key features due to lack of documentation or binary blobs. Below that is a vast sea of largely-anonymous Chinese-based hardware companies who drop a design (sometimes really neat) into the world, then disappear without a trace. Mostly I think these are designs whipped up quickly to use up spare parts, or originally designed for embedded use in a particular product and being sold on the side. (I've definitely seen 'development boards' that were clearly designed for security cameras or TV decoder boxes, f.ex.) But you are buying yourself a new hobby if you decide to get one.

magios 3y ago

i agree, that is a problem, mainline linux and working drm, that is direct rendering manager, drivers should exist before release of the product.

bagels 3y ago

Beaglebone Black is used in industrial applications. At scale, those price differences add up.

cozzyd 3y ago
yes, especially because there is an industrial variant that works down to -40 C. We use them in our detectors in Greenland. rpi's sometimes work at low temperatures, but are not spec'd for it (plus they use tons of power compared to the BBB).
- bagels 3y ago
  Yes, for the application I used them in, we were concerned about both the upper and lower limits (heat from operation + cold when turned off in the winter). Outdoor installation, with hundreds of units per site.

joezydeco 3y ago

As someone that has actually shipped RPi-like boards and clones, I'll tell you that it's just part of the job description. They ALL suck, some just suck less than others. Broadcom, Renesas? The worst. ST, NXP, TI? Slightly better than fully sucking. Look to the chipmaker (ST, NXP) and not the board maker (Orange) for a guide in how well things go.

colechristensen 3y ago
But the RPi is broadcom and arguably the best supported. Obviously this is special. From experience I agree with you, the chipmakers suck because they utterly fail to be open source when they're one of the groups that needs it the most. It is to the extent that I would advocate for laws in the theme of right-to-repair to force chip vendors to provide source for necessary code to use their products to consumers. (in this case open source in the narrowest definition, they can keep their copyrights but would be required to distribute source to end users in a form and with a license that makes them usable) If the question is "are any of the SBCs worth the trouble?" and the default answer is no unless I have a really good reason and want to dedicate the time to building the janky software stack (I don't), or they're from a small list of vendors I'd trust won't be a mess (RPi, nvidia, beagle, ... that's it off the top of my head)
- joezydeco 3y ago
  Were the kernel and BSP improvements and ongoing support for RPi produced by Broadcom, or by the user community?
  - colechristensen 3y ago
    There is some sort of close relationship between Broadcom and the raspberry pi foundation which is not entirely clear, they are a bit more than just customers although companies use the “partnership” label to mean just about anything.
    - joezydeco 3y ago

eek2121 3y ago

The VisionFive 2 developers are working on getting things upstreamed/open-sourced for their board. IIRC the kernel has already mainlined many (if not all) of the patches. Some of the real issues are as follows: 1) Most companies use Debian as a base. Debian has a notoriously slow release cycle. This means it takes loads of time to submit patches -> get approval -> get merged in a merge window -> wait for debian to use new kernel with new code. 2) The GPU situation is a mess. No decent (compatible) vendors with open source GPU drivers exist. Imagination is said to be working on open source drivers, but with no real release date, we are stuck using closed source blobs. Once drivers and Mesa get updated, we then have to wait for a new release of Debian to pick these up. 3) Far fewer people use these boards over a Raspberry Pi. This means community support takes longer to develop. The VF2 has other distros like Arch and Ubuntu, for example, but no real active community behind them. Last I checked, hardware GPU acceleration was not working in these distros.

bitwize 3y ago

I keep saying, the first cheap Chinese manufacturer that ships a SystemReady board is going to slaughter the competition.

jona-f 3y ago

Wait, I used OrangePi's with Allwinner chips before precisely cause of their cheap price and mainline linux support. At the time (~5 years ago) Rpi was worse, foss-wise. Here is a wiki documenting the efforts: https://linux-sunxi.org/Linux_mainlining_effort https://linux-sunxi.org/Linux_mainlining_effort What am i missing?

Cyder 3y ago
i use orangepi prime boards in production as remote NIDS. i used Armbian (a great debian porting project that does what the maker should have done ) until orange released their Debian 10 img. I put an endurance rated sdcard in those pis and they run like the little pink bunny! Love these little orangepis. I have tried a handful of other boards ( beagle, raspberry, banana , have a whole stack. too many to remember) but the oranges are solid. On a lot of these little SoCs, you can use the raspberry pi gpio software since many of these boards follow the same gpio standard & plug in/out.

imtringued 3y ago

> There's another factor that's so much more important [...]: Software/kernel support. Vision Five 2 it is then

Kadin 3y ago

I agree with everything except I don't think I would have called out OrangePi as the worst of the lot -- at least not anymore. They seem to have basically outsourced their software maintenance to Armbian, and if that relationship holds it's probably a win-win. Armbian's build system is really nice, IMO. FriendlyElec are borderline; they make nice hardware but definitely seem to take a "here's a kernel we got to boot once, good luck!" attitude towards software support. Some of their boards are supported by Armbian but often without key features due to lack of documentation or binary blobs. Below that is a vast sea of largely-anonymous Chinese-based hardware companies who drop a design (sometimes really neat) into the world, then disappear without a trace. Mostly I think these are designs whipped up quickly to use up spare parts, or originally designed for embedded use in a particular product and being sold on the side. (I've definitely seen 'development boards' that were clearly designed for security cameras or TV decoder boxes, f.ex.) But you are buying yourself a new hobby if you decide to get one.