27 ms·
Newpipe.net removed from Google search results due to DMCA take down request
- the-scrabi 3y agoGoogle accepted a DMCA request for the homepage of the Android streaming app NewPipe. Its homepage newpipe.net has been removed from Google search results if one searches for "newpipe". NewPipe is an alternative privacy focused YouTube frontend, but also supports other services like PeerTube, SoundCloud and Bandcamp.
- atherton33 3y agoThe way the DMCA works, to my understanding, Google has to accept the notice, unless NewPipe submits a counter notice, which can be done here: https://support.google.com/legal/troubleshooter/1114905 https://support.google.com/legal/troubleshooter/1114905 Proceed as if reporting infringement, and the option will appear to specify this is a counter report. If the reporter chooses to continue, the next step is with the courts.
- fweimer 3y agoI don't think counter notices apply to circumvention devices. There is also no liability exemption for service providers.
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- wtallis 3y ago> I don't think counter notices apply to circumvention devices. Right, because the DMCA takedown notice procedure as a whole doesn't apply to circumvention devices, only to content that is itself copyright infringement.
- boomboomsubban 3y agoExactly. The DRM circumvention parts of the DMCA specify a court order is needed to stop a circumvention device.
- dcow 3y agoWhy isn't this higher up? This seems like the actual meat of the discussion: Google is erroneously interpreting this takedown request as something it's supposed to comply with, when in fact it's not. Furthermore by misinterpreting requirements here Google is harming the public and newpipe. I wonder what newpipe's appeal (to Google) process looks like...
- SauciestGNU 3y agoPutting on my conspiracy theory hat, but I've used the NewPipe android app for at least a couple years now and the experience has been so good I wondered why Google hadn't made more of an effort to quash it. Maybe this is a way for them to harm the project without looking anticompetitive or something.
- skissane 3y ago> Google has to accept the notice, unless NewPipe submits a counter notice, They don’t have to accept it-they can choose to ignore or reject it. However, if they choose to ignore/reject it, and the notifier then sues them, they may lose one of their legal defences. Obviously they decide that most of the time complying is the legally less risky path, so most of the time they comply. However, if they get a DMCA request for a famous website like nytimes.com, they probably won’t action it.
- qingcharles 3y agoI think they have a whitelist for things like Wikipedia.
- supriyo-biswas 3y agoURL should refer to the original source, which is https://lumendatabase.org/notices/34149383 https://lumendatabase.org/notices/34149383
- winterqt 3y agoI think this blog post by the Newpipe team is a fine link to use to provide context + promote their CTA so people can help them, no?
- phh 3y agoThere is chrome.google.com and www.facebook.com in the list. That's pretty cool. I'm not saying they are wrong, chrome definitely allows you to decode drm-encombered files, but uh...
- supriyo-biswas 3y agoIt's likely to be a link to an extension on the Chrome web store and perhaps a similar download link on Facebook.
- cge 3y agoThe Lumen Database page lists only domain names of the URLs in the complaint unless you solve a captcha and enter an email address. The full complaint lists https://newpipe.net/ https://newpipe.net/ itself, while the chrome.google.com (and addons.mozilla.org, and store.microsoft.com...) URLs are to browser extension pages, and the Facebook URL is the URL of a post that has a link to a Youtube downloader. The list generally seems to be a collection of things that range from the websites of Youtube downloaders and interfaces to simply mentions of them, including a Wikipedia page about Youtube downloaders and a Trustpilot page of reviews about a website for one. Item 9, meanwhile, appears to be a completely unrelated Soundcloud track that isn't even connected to the complaint description, but appears to have the URL of a Youtube downloader in the title.
- talldatethrow 3y agoI just installed the app. Thanks Google.
- 4ggr0 3y agoThere a version of the NewPipe app which contains the SponsorBlock plugin. I use it since months and can't watch YouTube videos without it anymore.
- dspillett 3y agoI block ads not because I'm completely anti-advert. I'm anti being-stalked-through-my-entire-life-and-having-my-details-sold-like-I'm-a-cheap-peice-of-meat, and unfortunately ATM blocking that also means blocking most online adverts. So I draw the line before sponsorblock. At least the content creators get a better cut of that than they get from YouTube monetisation & youtube can't take it away from them as easily at a whim, and those segments don't track me, and there is an increased chance that the sponsor is relevant to what I'm looking at (not what I clicked on days ago). One or two channels even manage to make the sponsor segments fractionally entertaining. I'm also anti irritating adverts of course, which does include manually skipping some sponsor segments or avoiding channels that can be relied upon to be irritating in that way.
- yetanotherloss 3y agoI'm completely anti advert. They declared war on civilization 20 years ago and don't deserve to be treated as anything but a parasitic cultural disease. It didn't have to be this way, but that's where they took us.
- robertlagrant 3y agoAs long as you avoid things that are paid for by ads, there's no moral problem.
- mcpackieh 3y ago
- jeroenhd 3y agoAll of this because they don't want you to download Guizmo - Dans ma ruche (https://ssyoutube.com/en691rT/ https://ssyoutube.com/en691rT/) Not the first time they've spammed DMCA takedowns either: https://lumendatabase.org/faceted_search?sender_name=Because+Music https://lumendatabase.org/faceted_search?sender_name=Because... In comically French fashion, their complaints also include the same message in French just in case someone in Mountain View is more fluent in French than in English. I wonder if this is just a bunch of amateurs hired by the French label or if they actually pay legal professionals to spam these.
- simlevesque 3y agoSomebody drank too much Ballantine.
- fathyb 3y agoWell that's just normal!
- donmcronald 3y agoI'm pretty skeptical of stuff like that. To me, it looks like they proxy the download for you, but that doesn't make sense because there's no way they have the revenue to support that, right? How does it work? Can someone explain it to me?
- jeroenhd 3y agoYou take youtube-dl/yt-dlp, make a frontend for submitting URLs to it, and stick it in on a page absolutely teeming with ads. With enough ads and enough random people searching for "youtube MP3 downloader" you can cover the server expenses and probably make a few bucks per month in the process.
- Jenk 3y ago> Dear ssyoutube.com User: As you may have heard, our industry has been under strenuous attacks by certain GB copyright holders. Because of these attacks, it has become financially impractical for ssyoutube.com to continue to provide services in the Great Britain. Accordingly, ssyoutube.com will be terminating its services in the Great Britain as of November 3, 2022. We thank you for your past loyalty and patronage and wish you health and safety during the present health crisis and beyond. Very truly yours, ssyoutube.com Well that's just awesome.
- 2OEH8eoCRo0 3y agoIsn't Google forced to comply with DMCA takedown requests regardless of their legitimacy?
- chris37879 3y agoNo, that’s just how they’ve chosen to handle them to keep their unofficial “safe harbor” status since net neutrality is dead.
- 2OEH8eoCRo0 3y agoSafe harbor is officially part of DMCA though where if you are notified of infringing content and take it down you aren't liable right? https://www.eff.org/issues/dmca https://www.eff.org/issues/dmca https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_Millennium_Copyright_Act https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_Millennium_Copyright_A... > DMCA Title II, the Online Copyright Infringement Liability Limitation Act ("OCILLA"), creates a safe harbor for online service providers (OSPs, including ISPs) against copyright infringement liability, provided they meet specific requirements.
- wtallis 3y agoThe notice [0] says "Kind of Work: Unspecified" and "Original URLs: No copyrighted URLs were submitted" so the safe harbor provisions pertaining to copyright infringement aren't really applicable here. [0] https://lumendatabase.org/notices/34149383 https://lumendatabase.org/notices/34149383
- kelnos 3y agoSafe harbor has nothing to do with net neutrality. Not complying with DMCA takedown notices would leave them open to legal liability, which I think is fair for them not to want to do.
- tohnjitor 3y agoNewPipe is excellent. I was disappointed that it was not available for desktop until I discovered tartube which will download video files from almost any website easily
- mrmuagi 3y agoOh neat, looks like tartube is a GUI frontend for youtube-dl.
- tohnjitor 3y agoIt defaults to youtube-dlp but can be toggled back and forth with youtube-dl.
- wkat4242 3y agoWhat's the difference between the dlp and dl versions? I've only ever tried dl.
- skeletonjelly 3y agoyoutube-dl is unmaintained. yt-dlp is a maintained fork
- dark-star 3y agoJDownloader, youtube-dl, yt-dlp and many others can also download YouTube videos (and hundreds of other sites). Yes, the last two are command line tools, but if you put them on your desktop you can just drag&drop any YouTube-link on them and it will download it for you
- RunSet 3y agoStacher is a decent frontend for yt-dlp for the command-line averse. https://stacher.io/ https://stacher.io/
- alisonatwork 3y ago
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- world2vec 3y agoAny good equivalent to Newpipe for iOS? I'm using Video Lite so I only get one ad when opening the app. I'd like to have SponsorBlock like some Newpipe versions have and no ads at all.
- waxyalan 3y agoYattee is worth checking out https://github.com/yattee/yattee https://github.com/yattee/yattee
- fryman 3y agoSafari extensions vinegar and sponsorblock. Youtube in safari is a little janky compared to the app, but that’s the best I’ve found.
- TechBro8615 3y agoVinegar is the best. It replaces hostile video players like the one on YouTube with native HTML5 <video> elements so everything works as expected (like picture-in-picture).
- aeyes 3y agouYouPlus (sideloading required) Works without a jailbreak, you just have to refresh the app every 7 days but thats pretty much automated these days.
- r00t4ccess 3y agoI just use the brave browser on ios it blocks ads ootb
- hunter2_ 3y agoDMCA anti-circumvention provisions are regarding tools that circumvent effective access controls. I realize that broken encryption is considered an effective access control in this context despite it being broken, but apps like Newpipe aren't even breaking encryption, right? What aspect of the YouTube servers' behavior can be construed as an effective access control? Is there even a rudimentary secret, that never gets served to clients typically but that apps like Newpipe figured out? Unofficial cable TV descramblers are illegal despite simply reconstructing the missing sync signal, but that's because they facilitate theft of services that are normally paid. YouTube is free.
- NovemberWhiskey 3y agoAccess to YouTube videos is only "authorized" through YouTube's site and official apps (or yada yada), and YouTube videos are copyrighted material. YouTube has technological measures to ensure that you only watch YouTube videos that way. If you circumvent those technology measures, that's prima facie a DMCA violation, no? The definition of circumvention of a technology measure is extremely broad including "to avoid, bypass, remove, deactivate, or impair a technological measure". I'm pretty much of the opinion that the DMCA is a piece of crap as a law, but it doesn't lack for breadth and generality in those definitions.
- hunter2_ 3y agoSure, but I'm trying to grok the essence of the technological measure being used by YouTube. I have to imagine that merely offering terms of service doesn't constitute a technological measure, and nor would merely slicing up the response in a DASH-like manner [0]. [0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dynamic_Adaptive_Streaming_over_HTTP https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dynamic_Adaptive_Streaming_ove...
- gjsman-1000 3y agoWell... here's the dumb thing. The DASH-like manner (or, "rolling cipher" as they like to call it) has currently held up as being an effective protection measure. It comes up all the time when RIAA in particular sues YouTube stream-rippers. https://torrentfreak.com/deciphering-youtubes-rolling-cypher-in-your-browser-is-a-piece-of-cake-201030/ https://torrentfreak.com/deciphering-youtubes-rolling-cypher...
- awinter-py 3y agoincredibly useful product. pretty sure 'background play' is a paid feature on default droid youtube[1]. newpipe does it out of the box. I don't object to paying for youtube but I do object to them linking my watch activity to my account. guessing youtube is constantly trying to kill this, just like ytdl, but for now amazing work keeping it up 1. https://support.google.com/youtube/answer/7437614 https://support.google.com/youtube/answer/7437614
- floomk 3y ago> guessing youtube is constantly trying to kill this, just like ytdl, but for now amazing work keeping it up their lawyers are, but the developers certainly aren't. the og youtube-dl hasn't released in 2 years and still works mostly fine.
- awinter-py 3y agoah I switched to yt-dlp, but forgot why
- gumby 3y agoIt's still in Duck Duck Go.
- kulahan 3y agoIt's also still in Google if you search for a specific-enough phrase. `newpipe site` brings it up as the first result
- kim0 3y agoPraying they don't touch Brave browser! Most of my YouTube is thorough it these days.
- jraph 3y agoIsn't this totally irrelevant? Do you really expect a DMCA takedown for a browser? So why mention it? I guess it's an IMoB (Irrelevant Mention of Brave)
- tintedfireglass 3y agoProbably talking about ad-blockers? Not sure why brave was brought up as ad-blockers aren't brave-specific.
- poplet 3y agoGoogle probably indexes 25% of the content available nowadays.... I rarely use Google
- AhoyYarr 3y agoIs there a good search engine that indexes more stuff?
- lolinder 3y agoIt doesn't index more stuff overall, but marginalia.nu has a pretty great system for identifying non-commercial sites, which tend to be higher quality since they're not trying to sell crap. The creator recently started working on it full-time. https://search.marginalia.nu/ https://search.marginalia.nu/
- Zuiii 3y agoPrecisely what I wanted to ask as well. I only of yandex which gives really good results like old google, but I'd rather have alternatives in case when yandex fails. The general search engines that I know of are (ordered from best to worst): - yandex - ddg - google Literally any search engine, regardless of affiliation, is welcome as long as it returns google-grade results (old google ofc) for more than half its searches.
- can16358p 3y agoWe need a decentralized, uncensorable search engine. Imagine everything that big players want to censor, being available to everyone.
- zenapollo 3y agoSounds like a good idea in theory, but when i do imagine it, it seems like it might be a dystopian nightmare of the worst parts of our nature. I think a better idea would be a regulatory environment for tech that - squeezed monopolies and oligopolies, mandated transparency, and mandated a minimal system of human-tended justice and appeals.
- IX-103 3y agoSo child porn and snuff films for everyone? No thanks.
- RunSet 3y agoThe "I'm feeling lucky" button gets replaced with one reading "Feel lucky, punk?"
- MichaelDickens 3y agoPresumably, any search engine that works passably well will not show you snuff films if you type in a search for something entirely different. The only people who see snuff films will be the ones looking for them. Child porn shouldn't be on the internet because it is illegal, and if it's not on the internet, it won't come up in search. If it does come up in search, that makes it all the easier to report to the police.
- can16358p 3y agoAny client can be configured to filter those out. Freedom comes at a price and I believe, while I'd never support such results, the scenario that includes unwanted/illegal results is still better for the pursuit of taking power and control of freedom of speech from big corps and governments in the long run.
- isaacremuant 3y agoBrave search works. Google is no longer a very reliable search engine, between the terrible spam, the insane censorship, the political biases and "regulations" such as this one.
- FpUser 3y agoDid a search and the link is right there.
- userbinator 3y agoWhy should I be forced to use (a recent, and thus increasingly more user-hostile version of) Big Browser in order to visit a site? There's a huge difference between "not supported" meaning "you're on your own" and "illegal". Call it what it really is: user-agent discrimination. Don't let them dictate the software (and hardware) that we can use.
- McSwag 3y agoWait, if there’s a site I don’t want to see search results for I can just submit a DMCA?
- 10g1k 3y agoGoogle search results are never organic/natural. They are ordered by crazy crap ranks and money. And by Google policies like this.
- aembleton 3y agoI think the DMCA is a US Government policy, not Googles
- Zuiii 3y agoI have a set of test questions I use to gauge how badly a LLM model has been lobotomized whenever a new one is released. This post made me finally realize that google search is really going away (compromise core mission due to invalid DMCA request? really??) and that I will have to start looking for new search engines. This of course means that I need a way to gauge prospective search engines. My first attempt: - Search for software like newpipe and dolphine emulator - Search for content that very strong people fought hard to bury - Search for public library sites like libgen, zstd, and scihub. - Search for popular torrent sites - Search for far-right content if search engine is US-based (suggestions please) - Search for far-left content if search engine is US-based (suggestions please) What else have I missed? Sidenote: It's been clear for a while now that unbiased google-grade search engines are going away. Each search engine has at least one topic where it would deliberately return garbage results. We need a meta search engine that automatically routes a search query to the least damaged search engine.
- d33 3y agoIs "zstd" a typo? Couldn't find any sources on it (unless we mean the compression standard), including Wikipedia.
- Zuiii 3y agoSorry, I always mix the two together. I meant zlibrary: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Z-Library https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Z-Library Most search results on google give fake clones. The current urls in wikipedia seem to be accurate. Also, use the Tor version because it has far more books.
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- pallas_athena 3y agoz-library? wild guess.
- Zuiii 3y agoThought up of a few more search engine tests: - Search for specific git hashes, model numbers, and other forms of UIDs - Search for known phone numbers - Search for Tiananmen Square and Winnie the Pooh - Search for the Armenian genocide - Search for Mein kampf, Der Judenstaat, and other symbols used by extremists Unfortunately, I have a fairly western-centric view of the world. I need the perspectives of others with different views to cover my blind spots. I don't care what values you hold, I just want a reliable search engine tool that doesn't hide information from me.
- arun-mani-j 3y ago> As a result, websites for fake clones of NewPipe that mimic our homepage will tend to rank higher in the results. This could ultimately cause users to fall for such scams. Exactly, causes more harm than any good.
- 4mitkumar 3y agoFor what it's worth, Google results continue to show the F-droid, GitHub and all other links for NewPipe for me. May be, because I'm accessing it from outside USA
- 4mitkumar 3y agoNever mind; just realised that they are blocking results to the NewPipe.net. It still shows up when searching for it directly though
- villgax 3y agoPut your damn content behind a paywall then
- hathym 3y agowww.microsoft.com and play.google.com are also listed in the DMCA take down list :D https://lumendatabase.org/notices/34149383# https://lumendatabase.org/notices/34149383#
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- aembleton 3y agoI've just got the full URLs. Microsoft is for https://www.microsoft.com/store/apps/9PM4ZSJWHFHS https://www.microsoft.com/store/apps/9PM4ZSJWHFHS so I guess it was some app they wanted removing from the store and play.google.com was for a video downloader: https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=video.downloader.videodownloader&hl=en&gl=US https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=video.download... Full list: https://yt1s.mobi/en88/ https://yt1s.mobi/en89/ https://yt1s.mobi/en90/ https://yt1s.mobi/en91/ https://yt1s.youtubemini.com/ https://y2mate.tools/en59ac/yt1s.html https://aulavirtual.ins.gob.pe/blog/index.php?entryid=5488 https://www.facebook.com/105111868246057/posts/httpsyt1scomfor-mp3-httpsmp3downycom/105114161579161/ https://soundcloud.com/jameshaskins928/yt1s-com-richboytroy-beginning/sets https://yt1s.info/ https://www.similarweb.com/website/yt1s.com/competitors/ https://www.saashub.com/compare-yt1s-ltd-vs-youtube-video-and-audio-downloader?ref=sidebar https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/yt1s/ https://xranks.com/alternative/yt1s.online https://qnnit.com/yt1s/ https://www.trustpilot.com/review/yt1s.com https://m.apkpure.com/yt1s/com.technologygateway.video_downloader https://b.trafo.no/6d/yt1-youtube-downloader/pages https://www.cyclonis.com/es/is-yt1s-com-safe-to-use/ https://yt1s.works/ena/ https://nz.trustpilot.com/review/yt1s.com https://us.host-tools.com/website-status/yt1s.com/http https://en.y2mate.is/266/ https://ssyoutube.com/en620/ https://snapsave.io/en45 https://save-from.net/en19/youtube-video-downloader https://gotranscript.com/youtube-downloader https://y2mate.tools/en59ac/ https://tubemate.net/ https://www.freemake.com/free_video_downloader_paradisiac/ https://yt-convert.com/en20 https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/video-downloader-professi/elicpjhcidhpjomhibiffojpinpmmpil?hl=en https://www.softwaretestinghelp.com/free-youtube-video-downloader/ https://www.dvdvideosoft.com/free-youtube-download-en2 https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/easy-youtube-video-download/ https://www.vlogr.com/features/youtube-downloader/ https://newpipe.net/ https://ytshorts.savetube.me/3 https://www.youtubedownloaderhd.com/download.html https://ytmp3.nu/58c/ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_YouTube_downloaders https://ytmp3.nu/CeFA/ https://ytgoconverter.com/en_us/youtube-to-mp3-converter24/ https://tomp3.cc/ent77no https://x2download.app/en69/download-youtube-to-mp3 https://ytmp3.cc/2e8/ https://listenvid.net/us_131f1/ https://savemp3.net/9vpv2/ https://yt5s.io/en82/youtube-to-mp3 https://yt-convert.com/youtube-to-mp3-20 http://wiki.coursemerchant.com/6d/youtube-to-mp3-converter/pages https://www.movavi.com/learning-portal/best-youtube-to-mp3-converter.html https://www.getsubly.com/post/youtube-to-mp3-converter https://techjury.net/best/youtube-to-mp3-converter/ https://www.dvdvideosoft.com/en11 https://yt1s.mobi/en69/youtube-to-mp4/ https://4kdownload.to/en1/ https://y2mate.tools/en59ae/youtube-mp4 https://notube.site/es/youtube-app-v52 https://www.ytbvideoly.com/d7-youtube-to-mp4/ https://10downloader.com/en/62/youtube-to-mp4-converter https://www-ytmp4.com/ https://ytmp4.tube/ https://yt1s.de/youtube-to-mp4?l=en18 https://plugin.crimple.co.uk/z/ms/x7v/youtube-converter-mp4-converter/pages https://x2download.app/en77 https://en.savefrom.net/21-youtube-to-mp4-1.html https://ytmp4converter.com/en/ https://youtube4kdownloader.com/en71/download-youtube-4k-mp4.html https://y2mate.la/download-yt-to-mp4-en1/ https://yt-convert.com/youtube-to-mp4-20 https://ytmp4.top/en1/ https://ssyoutube.com/en623/ https://ssyoutube.com/en624/ https://ssyoutube.com/en625/ https://ssyoutube.com/en626/ https://www.4kdownload.com/products/videodownloader-29 https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=video.downloader.videodownloader&hl=en&gl=US https://www.microsoft.com/store/apps/9PM4ZSJWHFHS https://y2mate.com.co/en6 https://givefastlink.com/allvideo/ https://www.yt2conv.com/youtube-downloader-53/ https://addoncrop.com/v17/youtube-downloader/ https://ytshorts.savetube.me/ https://youtube4kdownloader.com/en71/cut-youtube-video.html
- hknmtt 3y agothis reminded me to install f-droid on my new phone :)
- prince005 3y agoI fail to understand why people think that YouTube is a charity service. They are a business and act like one, you'd do the same if someone threatens your business.
- McDyver 3y agoI don't think that's the issue. The problem is that YouTube/google want "le beurre, l’argent du beurre, et le sourire de la crémière". They want to (and are managing) to distort the openness of the web: they provide free access to a service, the way the web intended to be; but don't want people to use the tools in the way they are meant to be used. If they want to charge for the service, fine, it's their prerogative but don't blame the users for using the tools as they are meant to be used. Why don't they stop free aceess? They can, no one is stopping them from doing business that way. Because they want everything, that's why. When will their "business" stop? What's the end goal?
- jedberg 3y agoThe biggest failure of the DMCA was that there are no consequences for false accusations. That one small change would make a huge difference. Put the liability on the reporter for false claims.
- __MatrixMan__ 3y agoWe could always manufacture some consequences ourselves...
- mavhc 3y agoIf it's wrong you just counter-notice and it's put back again, does take two weeks though. If the initial person is not the copyright holder they've committed perjury. Seems like it's been rescinded though
- jedberg 3y agoWhich is an undue burden on legit publishers who get effectively DDosed by big publishers with money. If the big publishers have no consequences, then they have no incentive to stop. If they got ever increasing fines for false claims, then they would have an incentive to actually only make legit claims.
- mavhc 3y agoSet up and automatic counter-notice bot to start with, thus annoying them back. However: Any person who knowingly materially misrepresents under this section— (1) that material or activity is infringing, or (2) that material or activity was removed or disabled by mistake or misidentification, shall be liable for any damages, including costs and attorneys’ fees, incurred by the alleged infringer, by any copyright owner or copyright owner’s authorized licensee, or by a service provider, who is injured by such misrepresentation, as the result of the service provider relying upon such misrepresentation in removing or disabling access to the material or activity claimed to be infringing, or in replacing the removed material or ceasing to disable access to it. 17 U.S.C.A. § 512
- 3y ago
- mijoharas 3y agoI clicked through to the lumen database link included[0], and it says "notice rescinded.". There is no updated blog post. But newpipe shows up in a google search for me. Does anyone have an update on this article? [0] https://lumendatabase.org/notices/34149383 https://lumendatabase.org/notices/34149383
- kristopolous 3y agoI'm beginning to notice that Google seems to be favoring Google products in search quite a bit. It's kinda the Microsoft 1999 vibe
- taoufix 3y agoCalling it now: Overpriced Youtube API requests in 1, 2, 3...
- toaster_fcker 3y agomaybe it came back?? because i got the offical website right at the beginning