3 ms·
Replace them both with a model somewhat like Wikipedia, open the content for the world, and get a cut of profits from the corporations that want to use the data
by sitkack 3y ago
Replace them both with a model somewhat like Wikipedia, open the content for the world, and get a cut of profits from the corporations that want to use the data to train on it.
- marcosdumay 3y agoAfter I made that comment, I stopped for a short time to think what I would do. My conclusion was that it is much better done with something like Mastodon (or even Mastodon itself) than with a web site.
- sitkack 3y agoAnd then community projects subscribe to the feeds and index and make searchable? I could see basically structured toots representing questions and then ... oh man, did you just nerd snipe this? Are you saying that it should be managed by Mastodon the org, or fediverse the technology?
- marcosdumay 3y agoI meant the technology. The one downside that I see is that AFAIK, there is bad support for editing questions and answers. If something like this is created, there could be threads of patches making any edition, but that requires tooling support. (And yeah, I'm purposefully trying to nerd-sniping people here :)
- sitkack 3y agoYou have to paint a nicer starting canvas to really lure in the nerds, they can add one pretty little bush and feel like they just made the Mona Lisa. Extra points if there are two natural yet divisive solutions. Truly a tire-fire of flame war in the making. Events! gRPC! Both! Kafka! Rabbit!