6 ms·
I Fired Myself
- simonh 3y ago>>"there's been an outbreak of Office Politics on LV-421" >"Nuke the site from orbit, it's the only way to be sure."
- louissan 3y agoSadly, Exterminatus is indeed the only option sometimes. May the Emperor bless their souls.
- marcosdumay 3y agoIf there were some quarantining procedure that would work, I guess everybody's life would improve. But AFAIK, any quarantine makes it spread.
- uoaei 3y agoCan we petition HN somehow to refuse posting pay-wall or app-wall links? Unless HN is encouraging its users to circumvent these features, which is in the hacker spirit but certainly dubious on the business relations front.
- itscrush 3y agoCheck out the FAQ @ https://news.ycombinator.com/newsfaq.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newsfaq.html ... No and yes it's ok. > It's ok to post stories from sites with paywalls that have workarounds. > In comments, it's ok to ask how to read an article and to help other users do so. But please don't post complaints about paywalls. Those are off topic[0]. More here[1]. [0]https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10178989 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10178989 [1]https://hn.algolia.com/?query=paywalls%20by:dang&dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=false&sort=byDate&type=comment https://hn.algolia.com/?query=paywalls%20by:dang&dateRange=a...
- uoaei 3y agoHow gray of an area is 'technically unsanctioned bot posts article content as a comment on the HN submission page'?
- mschuster91 3y agoThat would expose the bot's operator to some massive liability, and I'd guess the mods would boot it with the first DMCA claim coming in.
- uoaei 3y agoSurely the HN moderators are not legally obligated to chase rogue bots on multiple usernames for unrelated third parties. It wouldn't be "spammy" so they'd have no need to react to it for their own moderation duties. The DMCA claims seem thin in any case especially considering SCOTUS's reaffirmation of Section 230. I don't think iterating through hypothetical legal arguments is very useful without the attendant analysis.
- xavdid 3y agoThere are good alternative frontends for sites like medium (and twitter). Here's the article unobstructed: https://scribe.rip/m/global-identity-2?redirectUrl=https%3A%2F%2Fblog.cto.berlin%2Fwhy-i-fired-myself-94deccee2c03 https://scribe.rip/m/global-identity-2?redirectUrl=https%3A%...
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- ctoberlin 3y agoI apologise for that. I noticed after posting and was unable to change it from metered to free.
- ChrisMarshallNY 3y ago> Secondly, be mindful of the company culture you create and the people you bring on board. They can either make or break your organization. I don't think that this cautionary statement will make much of a difference, but I completely agree. Founders deliberately create the culture of their dreams, and don't particularly care what anyone else thinks. It's a big part of the reason they are founding the endeavor. They don't want to deal with people that they believe will deter/hobble them. The boss gets what the boss wants. In some cases, I'm sure it's worked out well. In others ... maybe not so much. I've found that cultures that deliver great projects are often not "comfortable" ones. In my experience, the sickest organizations have been ones where everyone was always "on the same page," and there was little disagreement.
- zdragnar 3y agoBeing "on the same page" has two forms, one of which is healthy and the other is not. In organizations where everyone is trying to achieve the same broad goal, but have different ideas on how to achieve that goal, people are much more likely to propose novel ideas or changes which are healthy, and the business more readily adapts. In organizations where people are just saying "yes" to whatever the person above them said, important information that needs to bubble up cannot, mistakes are made, people are thrown under the bus, and it becomes a toxic hellscape. On the other hand, I've seen organizations where leaders were not "on the same page" and that lead to constant inter-department struggles. One would end up, by accident or intent, undermining another because they didn't have the same vision or strategy for getting there. Until someone up top is willing to lay down the law, being a manager in such an organization is effectively no different than being a politician.
- AlwaysRock 3y agoIt isnt always deliberate. I know companies that were two male founders of a specific race that then hired people they knew from their networks for their first few hires. All of a sudden they realized they were a 10+ person company and everyone was exactly like them. All of a sudden, hiring anyone who wasnt very like them became difficult. Have you ever tried to hire a female for an all male company? Have you ever tried to hire a Muslim for a company that is entirely Orthodox Jewish? Sometimes you just hire who you know until you realize you've created an environment that might be very difficult to grow further.
- toomanyrichies 3y agohttps://archive.ph/bDxZF https://archive.ph/bDxZF
- can16358p 3y agoShouldn't the title read "Why I Fired Myself", as that's the actual title in the article?
- wccrawford 3y agoHN removes certain words from titles automatically.
- adastra22 3y ago> The worst thing about politics is that you just need to hire one person who is “good at it,” and it spreads like a virus. Oh my goodness this is true. I’ve seen it play out myself multiple times, destroying the organization in the process. If I could filter out candidates based on this trait, all my hiring would be based on that.
- thih9 3y agoHow is firing yourself different from quitting?
- alex_suzuki 3y agoIt has a more positive ring to it, don’t you think?
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- ctoberlin 3y agoI used that term because it was my own company.
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- javier_e06 3y agoThe phrase "individuals who think alike", what does that mean? One business mantra goes: "If two people always agree, one is not needed" My ego gets a boost when people agree with my solutions but my intellect prefers to hear the rebuttals or even better, insights. People may tell you that they are driven by intellectual pursuits. Not true. We all want to feel good about what we do. So. What am I getting at? Not everything that shine is work.
- dshpala 3y agoHow can one become better at office politics? What are books to read / courses to take?
- CapstanRoller 3y agoRecite from an eldritch cursed hand-crafted copy of "How to Win Friends and Influence People" written in blood, backwards and upside down, under full moonlight, in an eerily silent forest clearing. (Light* animal sacrifice may also be required.)
- sumtechguy 3y agoI was forced to read that book and 'how to be a superstar'. Due to a manager who disliked my bluntness in saying things were broken. He wanted me to punch it up with doublespeak to make him feel better. They show how to manipulate people. But not solid advice on how to do the right thing.
- TremendousJudge 3y agoI don't think that anybody thinking in terms of "winning" friends and "influencing" people is worried at all about doing the "right" thing.
- RealityVoid 3y agoHonestly, I read the book about 15 years ago and my takeaway at that time was that... actually, It's OK to be nice to people and to let your desire to help them manifest itself. At that point in my life I was kind of a little shit and was utterly paranoid of being taken advantage of and viewed interactions very transactional. So, yeah... That's not what I took from that book at all. Maybe I should read it again because maybe it's not really as I remember it, since so many people seem to hate it?
- picture 3y ago
- gtop3 3y ago> The worst thing about politics is that you just need to hire one person who is “good at it,” and it spreads like a virus. If this person hires more people, they will most likely choose individuals who think alike. Before you know it, the whole department is infected. I wish there were more concrete problems about what specific problems were caused by playing internal politics. Sometimes I think tech people use politics as a four letter word, and it often is. Sometimes it isn't.
- PragmaticPulp 3y ago> The worst thing about politics is that you just need to hire one person who is “good at it,” and it spreads like a virus. If this person hires more people, they will most likely choose individuals who think alike. Before you know it, the whole department is infected. > In the end, we had to let an entire department go to solve the issue. Dropping an entire department is hard. Excising the bad employees is good in the long run, but the near term pain is a setback for the business. One of the hardest lessons I've learned is that the most political people don't look like they're playing "politics". They might be the friendliest, most charming, most outwardly positive people you meet. The way they manipulate might be cleverly disguised as being helpful or outwardly positive. One of the worst company politicians I dealt with had a charming way of smiling and speaking as though he was the calm voice of reason. If he wanted someone to lose status, he'd find clever ways to take them down a notch while looking like the hero. For example, if someone was more productive or talented than he was, he would start making a lot of comments about how he was "taking extra time to mentor <person> so they have the resources they need to succeed". When his own work started falling behind, he always had a faux-humble narrative about how he spent too much time helping partner teams deliver the work he needed to complete his own tasks, even though he did nothing of the sort. Repeat this over and over again and he developed a reputation for being "too kind" and acting as the mentor for everyone, while in reality the teams were always struggling to get him to keep up. He spent a lot of time in the office rubbing elbows with execs, even though we were a remote company and he didn't even have a place to sit there. He'd often miss our meetings because he was talking to people at the office while the rest of us were working. The politics were so obvious to me as a team member, but it blew my mind to see how well this tricks played with the management structure at the company. Management was already overworked and he was conveniently showing up to deliver them narratives and pretend to be the helpful guy. They ate it right up.
- giantg2 3y ago"They might be the friendliest, most charming, most outwardly positive people you meet." This is by far the biggest indicator to me that they're playing politics.
- 3y ago
- dsign 3y agoThings I learned from my startup: * Just don't. Life is too short. I would do it again, but only if it's to fix the second sentence above.
- jylam 3y agoI like people here commenting that "yes ! politics are the worst !", although the person never defines "politics", doesn't explain a bit about what happened, what went wrong, what were the reason for them quitting (not "firing themselves"), what the other people did, why they fired them or anything. He's just rambling in the void, or did I miss something ?
- ctoberlin 3y agoPolitics means partially to make tactical promises and not deliver, but to blame others for your failure while faking niceness to everyone. This also includes diverting attention to the engineering department's performance and delivery instead of your own, just because they make everything transparent and you don't. I will take your feedback and write more articles on that topic. Thank you!
- TremendousJudge 3y ago> I will take your feedback and write more articles on that topic. that does sound like a tactical promise /s
- RealityVoid 3y agoI mean, maybe, but I believe in essence, politics is about building social consensus. And that has value. It might be that the consensus you are building is positive or negative for certain people, but in the end it is a tool that you need to be able to wield. Failure to do so from good people will lead to worse outcomes.
- jylam 3y ago"Politics means partially to make tactical promises and not deliver, but to blame others for your failure while faking niceness to everyone." Nope ? Politics comes from the greek "Politikos", which relate to the organization of a society (or a company in this case). You seem to put a bad behavior into a word that doesn't mean what you think. Reading your post (I gather you are the author), you fired a whole team for "bad behavior", without explaining how you are not the problem. Maybe you aren't, but that demands explanations. For me and for what you explained (nothing), you are the problem, and the person blaming others while faking niceness to everyone.
- CollinEMac 3y agoI think this is one of those rare circumstances where the article would have actually been better if it were longer. I've got almost no idea what actually happened here or why.
- generalpf 3y agoYou didn't fire yourself, you quit.