3 ms·
Perhaps I missed the irony. But why do you think that is hostile?
by danwee 3y ago
Perhaps I missed the irony. But why do you think that is hostile?
- tom_ 3y agoI suspect you'd just disagree or fail to understand if it were explained. Safest to just trust the implied advice in this instance!
- stouset 3y ago“We’ll I don’t find it inappropriate so it’s completely impossible for me to bother trying to understand why someone else might.”
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- GMoromisato 3y agoMost porn objectifies women and many employees are women who do not like being objectified. Perhaps I missed the irony.
- danwee 3y agoGot it. I guess I'm slow today.
- nonethewiser 3y ago[flagged]
- Zetice 3y agoWrong battle, my friend. Directly referencing porn in the workplace creates a hostile work environment because porn is a taboo subject that offends some people, like it or not.
- kleene_op 3y agoI guess I'll be using male gay porn actor's names to label my servers. Or is that considered toxic too because there won't be any womens names?
- mcv 3y agoUnless they're obviously fake artist names, I wouldn't do that. Every real name carries the risk that a new hire might share that name, leading to all the confusion mentioned in the article.