2 ms·
You could use a synthetic benchmark. Create your own Geekbench like thing and use those numbers. Intel-$singlecore-$multicore So an Intel-6-12 had twice the s
by MBCook 4y ago
You could use a synthetic benchmark. Create your own Geekbench like thing and use those numbers.
Intel-$singlecore-$multicore
So an Intel-6-12 had twice the single core performance of the Intel-3-48 but is much worse in multicore.
Yeah, things are WAY more complicated. But at least it gives you a chance without memorizing spec sheets first. Higher numbers are always better. No redefining. This year’s 5 can’t be better than last year’s 20 in performance.
I don’t follow Intel/AMD chips anymore. If I wanted to buy a computer I’d have to learn it all from scratch. This would give me a nice leg up.
- bubblethink 4y ago>Intel-$singlecore-$multicore There will be power specs, and igpu specs, and ecc, and so on. It's hard to capture succinctly.
- Dylan16807 4y agoGpu can be a third number. Power doesn't need to be in the model number. Neither does ecc, also all cpus should have such an easy to implement feature.
- ddtaylor 4y agoFor the most part the transistor count (or something akin to it) is usually increasing, even if the die space is larger.