3 ms·
And I find this very dismissive top comments that seem to try to shun/silence any criticism, discussion or concern as "anti AI" are maddening to read as well.
by isaacremuant 4y ago
And I find this very dismissive top comments that seem to try to shun/silence any criticism, discussion or concern as "anti AI" are maddening to read as well.
Any criticism is met with "it'll get better, you MUST buy into the hype and draw all this hyperbolic conclusions or you're a luddite or a denier"
There's some great aspects and some fundamental flaws but somehow, we're not allowed to be very critical of it.
Hackernews looks very similar to Reddit nowadays. If you don't support whatever hype narrative there is, you must be "label".
It's not a simple discussion of "just add more tokens" or "It will get better".
- SpicyLemonZest 4y agoI don't think many people object to statements like "ChatGPT doesn't have world model". I'd guess that's wrong, but I'm happy to talk about it - we can have meaningful discussions about what exactly a world model is, how to distinguish between a bad world model and the lack of one, and where ChatGPT seems to model or not model the world. "ChatGPT is a glorified word predictor", on the other hand, can't really be discussed at all. I struggle to even call it a criticism or concern; it's a discussion-ender, a statement that the idea is too ridiculous to talk about at all.