3 ms·
No. I know there are plenty of things in the "could be substantiated" camp. I very intentionally am not interested in discussing those. Your claim is that we
by willis936 4y ago
No. I know there are plenty of things in the "could be substantiated" camp. I very intentionally am not interested in discussing those.
Your claim is that we have no way of discerning between "impossible" and "possible" conspiracy theories, which is wrong.
- timr 4y agoThat's a convenient rationalization, but I chose an example that was being dismissed as conspiracy within the current year. I literally have no opinion on the matter (see how that works?), but I know that it was a conspiracy, and now is an open debate.
- willis936 4y agoAnd it qualifies as a "could be substantiated". See? We can tell which conspiracy theories could be true and which couldn't.
- Dylan16807 4y agoIt was a debate from day one. I don't know what you mean.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- TylerE 4y agoDismissals don’t have to be in good faith either. I’m sure somewhere there is some arguing for hours that there is a vast conspiracy to insist the sky is blue, when it’s actually red.