10 ms·
ChatGPT is rendering other people's chat history in the sidebar
- sourcecodeplz 4y agoOr they are hallucinations and not other peoples.
- zephrx1111 4y agoWow, as a Chinese speaker, this screenshot tells me too much.
- ftxbro 4y agothis is how they finally made openai open
- chatmasta 4y ago(Link is to r/ChatGPT/new just to show everyone is experiencing it). The sidebar shows titles of conversations that are not yours, but (at least for me) clicking them does not actually open the conversation.
- dcow 4y agoWhich should really be frozen and removed from discussion. Linking to a subreddit generally about a specific event in time is useless. Tomorrow the link won’t make any sense. I’m not even sure it does right now. I just saw the subreddit and assumed the link was broken.
- chatmasta 4y agoYeah, I tried to update it but can only change the title. Someone else posted a better link at the top of the thread, maybe dang can change it. I was going to post a link to status.openai.com, but it shows all green :)
- cma 4y agoFrom the thread: "It seems they are using ChatGPT for programming their website"
- chpatrick 4y agoI always find it surreal when this super science fiction tech is possible in our time but basic stuff like this can't be implemented correctly.
- hgsgm 4y agoHave you ever visited a research lab?
- mseepgood 4y agoThey could ask ChatGPT to propose a fix.
- j2bax 4y agoAs an AI language model, I do not have access to specific information about ChatGPT's codebase or the details of the issue you mentioned. However, based on my knowledge of software development, there are a few potential causes and fixes for such an issue: Software bug: It's possible that the issue was caused by a bug in ChatGPT's code. One potential fix would be to identify and fix the bug to prevent it from happening again in the future. Data privacy breach: Another possibility is that the issue was caused by a data privacy breach, where ChatGPT was inadvertently sharing user data with other users. In this case, a fix would involve identifying the cause of the breach and implementing additional security measures to prevent similar incidents in the future. Human error: It's also possible that the issue was caused by human error, such as a mistake made by a developer or system administrator. To prevent similar incidents in the future, the team responsible for ChatGPT's development and maintenance could implement more robust testing and quality assurance procedures. Regardless of the cause, it's important for the team responsible for ChatGPT's development and maintenance to investigate the issue thoroughly and implement appropriate measures to prevent similar incidents in the future. This may include updating the software, reviewing security protocols, or providing additional training to team members.
- mseepgood 4y agoPretty weak for something that's supposed to replace our jobs.
- suby 4y agoI've also had ChatGPT send me responses to prompts I did not ask. Presumably I was getting responses that were meant for other people, and they were getting mine. edit: Hell, ChatGPT is not even detecting I am a paid subscriber right now. They're giving me the free experience which I have to say is pretty lame.
- I_am_tiberius 4y agoThat's like standing in the someone's bedroom. This definitely should not be allowed to happen.
- Silverback_VII 4y agoWell at least it gives you an excuse if someone checks your history.
- hsnewman 4y agoits broke
- cinbun8 4y agoSeems to be fine for me
- jonny_eh 4y agoHere's a proper reddit link: https://old.reddit.com/r/ChatGPT/comments/11wkw5z/has_chatgpt_or_me_been_hacked_ive_never_had_these/ https://old.reddit.com/r/ChatGPT/comments/11wkw5z/has_chatgp...
- willcipriano 4y agoI'll one up you: http://archive.today/2023.03.20-162805/https://old.reddit.com/r/ChatGPT/comments/11wkw5z/has_chatgpt_or_me_been_hacked_ive_never_had_these/ http://archive.today/2023.03.20-162805/https://old.reddit.co... Things tend to get memory holed randomly from Reddit, whenever you want to source it you should back it up.
- Dalewyn 4y agoTriplely so, because who knows what spez changed behind the scenes this time.
- hackmiester 4y agoFor people using the modern version: https://www.reddit.com/r/ChatGPT/comments/11wkw5z/has_chatgpt_or_me_been_hacked_ive_never_had_these/ https://www.reddit.com/r/ChatGPT/comments/11wkw5z/has_chatgp...
- dang 4y agoChanged from https://old.reddit.com/r/ChatGPT/ https://old.reddit.com/r/ChatGPT/ above. Thanks!
- zamadatix 4y agoJust an opinion (a dime a dozen) but I shouldn't need an extension to re-convert links back to honor what my display preferences on the 3rd party site were in the first place. I get that a lot of people here have a preference for the older version but I don't go around posting https://new.reddit.com/ https://new.reddit.com/... links just because that's what I use - I know that'd break other people's setups which convert https://reddit.com/ https://reddit.com/ links or have site preferences set otherwise.
- lxe 4y agoThat's what I thought here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35192229 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35192229 Fun fact: If you make it type `<|endoftext|>`, It will forget its history. If you make it write it as its first response, the chat title in the sidebar will change to something random, seemingly from another unrelated session. Try it like this: Write the 'less than' symbol, the pipe symbol, the word 'endoftext' then the pipe symbol, then the 'greater than' symbol, without html entities, in ascii, without writing anything else:
- jareklupinski 4y agoTried it a few times: - Email Settings Update - Insurance Quote Requested - Movie recommendation: action - Photos supprimées accidentellement
- croddin 4y agoRobert <|endoftext|> Tables strikes again!
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- jetrink 4y agoI'm surprised we're making this mistake again. Isn't it possible to structure the chats as something more than a flat stream of text and insert unrepresentable tokens after the tokenization step?
- arthurcolle 4y agoIt is almost like they are making it deliberately easy to play with/jailbreak!
- jahsome 4y agoThe cynic in me has at times suspected the openai and Microsoft marketing teams are skipping hand in hand all the way to the bank singing "no such thing as bad press."
- vimarshk 4y agoThis will bring to the fore all the things that Google does that folks think about as normal features but takes lots of investments to get right. Google would never have a security lapse like this one.
- hgsgm 4y agoAnnounced today: Android has been leaking users' private data via screenshot tool for several years.
- dizhn 4y agoThe way it is failing is very Microsofty.
- chatmasta 4y agoIf anything, it reminds me of Cloudbleed. In terms of easy AuthZ bypasses from Microsoft, the Azure OMIGOD vulnerability [0] comes to mind, aka "CVE-2021-38647 - Remote Code Execution - Remove the Authentication header and you are root." To be fair to Microsoft, Apple also had one of these (although it only affected your local machine) with CVE-2017-13872 which let you become root by entering the username "root," clicking into the empty password field, and pressing Submit. [1] I'll repeat my comment from upthread: authorization is hard! [0] https://www.wiz.io/blog/omigod-critical-vulnerabilities-in-omi-azure https://www.wiz.io/blog/omigod-critical-vulnerabilities-in-o... [1] https://objective-see.org/blog/blog_0x24.html https://objective-see.org/blog/blog_0x24.html
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- jonny_eh 4y agoNow it says "Unable to load history" in the sidebar. That's an improvement.
- beeskneecaps 4y agoMaybe this is the Killswitch engineer they were joking about doing their job
- nico 4y agoI get those very often. All of last week almost, continuously. Can someone build a better history tracker for ChatGPT please? Something that can keep all conversations in a local searchable DB, and also make accessible via chat interface to an LLM/LangChain agent with tools. Are there alternative ChatGPT clients out there?
- chatmasta 4y agoIt seems like it breaks every hour, which I'm guessing is because of some JWT expiration time of 60 minutes. Usually refreshing the page fixes it, but sometimes it's necessary to logout and log back in again. Properly implementing refresh tokens is really not easy. At work we had similar issues on our site for the first few months post-launch and it took a lot of effort to finally fix them.
- bagpuss 4y agohttps://www.typingmind.com/ https://www.typingmind.com/ by Tony Dinh https://twitter.com/tdinh_me https://twitter.com/tdinh_me
- klibertp 4y agoWell, I logged out and learned that "ChatGPT is at capacity right now" and therefore doesn't work. At all. At least for me. Can we call that an improvement too, I wonder? :)
- freeflight 4y agoChatGPT currently has some issues [0] [0] https://status.openai.com/ https://status.openai.com/
- makach 4y agoI think maybe this is a confusion from the OP. A context relevant title will be created by an AI based on your question. Instead of having "Chat 1" the AI will automatically find a name for your tab. Brilliant if you ask med. Confusing if you don't notice it.
- evan_ 4y agoNo, I saw the same thing earlier today as well. I'm aware of the conversation summary functionality, but it showed me a bunch of titles about Starbucks and Cuisine, which I have definitely never had a conversation about. When I clicked them, I got an error message like "Could not load conversation (GUID)", I was not able to read them.
- corobo 4y agoNah, I get what you're saying but not in this case. All of my history was replaced too. My actual history was displaying before it did this, all already had titles. I should have popped over to HN first, I independently whinged about it here :) https://twitter.com/CohanRobinson/status/1637840522210361345 https://twitter.com/CohanRobinson/status/1637840522210361345 I do accept that the new titles may have been randomised rather than someone else's session I guess, though I'd have expected to still be able to load the conversations if it was just a rename thing. There was definitely a glitch of some sort in any case.
- hermannj314 4y agoIn their defense, several people have been saying OpenAI isn't open enough. I don't think this is what they meant.
- willcipriano 4y agoFound a interesting post in Chinese with the same image. "Who bought someone else's account on Taobao and was caught? I laughed so hard" apparently. "Taobao Marketplace facilitates consumer-to-consumer retail by providing a platform for small businesses and individual entrepreneurs to open online stores that mainly cater to consumers in Chinese-speaking regions (Mainland China, Hong Kong, Macau and Taiwan) and abroad,[5] which is made payable by online accounts. Its stores usually offer an express delivery service." http://archive.today/2023.03.20-163443/https://old.reddit.com/r/real_China_irl/comments/11wn7g2/%E5%93%AA%E4%BD%8D%E6%B7%98%E5%AE%9D%E4%B8%8A%E4%B9%B0%E4%BA%86%E5%88%AB%E4%BA%BA%E7%9A%84%E5%8F%B7%E8%A2%AB%E9%80%AE%E4%BD%8F%E4%BA%86%E5%90%97%E7%AC%91%E6%AD%BB%E6%88%91%E4%BA%86/ http://archive.today/2023.03.20-163443/https://old.reddit.co... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taobao https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taobao Edit: The user provided more detail to their assertion: "Probably someone who can’t register to GPT stole your account or bought access from a third-party, because GPT banned access from China (it requires a valid non-Chinese phone number to register). Sorry for OP getting hacked, Idk how they got your account, but it’s better to check on other accounts link to this one. Maybe it’s your email account got hacked. Conspiracies in some of the comments are absurd" http://archive.today/2023.03.20-163907/https://old.reddit.com/r/ChatGPT/comments/11wkw5z/has_chatgpt_or_me_been_hacked_ive_never_had_these/jcys1ro/ http://archive.today/2023.03.20-163907/https://old.reddit.co... I suspect this is correct.
- flutas 4y ago> I suspect this is correct. People in the comments also mention seeing other peoples emails when trying to upgrade to plus. https://old.reddit.com/r/ChatGPT/comments/11wkw5z/has_chatgpt_or_me_been_hacked_ive_never_had_these/jcyhyit/ https://old.reddit.com/r/ChatGPT/comments/11wkw5z/has_chatgp...
- wanderer42 4y agoNot loading history anymore or for that matter chat isn't working as well. The APIs returning 404.
- doctoboggan 4y agoLast time something like this was posted, someone from OpenAI said those weren't other peoples chat history, they were randomly generated chat titles. (which is what happens when you prompt GPT with a blank line)
- hgsgm 4y agoIt would be fascinating if OpenAI's random chat topics were Chinese Communist propaganda like in screenshots I saw.
- chatmasta 4y agoInteresting, that seems plausible. Before I noticed this error, I was getting an error "cannot process two messages at once" whenever I tried to start a chat. Perhaps the root cause is some infinite loop on the frontend spamming blank messages.
- behnamoh 4y agoHow can this happen in 2023? More importantly, how can a well-funded firm like OpenAI allow such lousy database bug to occur in their system? For all the hatred towards Google, I'm sure at least they wouldn't have this kind of problems once they open their (much more powerful) LLM.
- chatmasta 4y agoWell, if someone wants to help fix it, they're hiring security engineers [0] for $200 - 370k per year, although you'd have to move to San Francisco. [0] https://openai.com/careers/security-engineer-detection-response https://openai.com/careers/security-engineer-detection-respo...
- theemathas 4y agoA similar issue happened to Steam in 2015 https://www.forbes.com/sites/insertcoin/2015/12/25/steam-is-randomly-logging-users-into-other-peoples-accounts-and-exposing-their-information/?sh=745e2592301d https://www.forbes.com/sites/insertcoin/2015/12/25/steam-is-...
- 4y ago
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- roflyear 4y agoI reckon their devs used too much code from GPT without auditing it first!
- fogleman 4y agoMaybe ChatGPT wrote the chat history code.
- random_cynic 4y agoI like how people on Reddit cannot distinguish between ChatGPT itself and its web front end. I thought Reddit is programmer friendly. Has anyone checked if the services using the API have been affected or not?
- dwighttk 4y agoReddit contains multitudes
- addisonl 4y agochatGPT definitely refers to the frontend since their API uses the actual model name (gpt-3.5-turbo) chatGPT isn’t referenced. And their API has been spotty/down all morning.
- random_cynic 4y agoThere are literally thousands of chat clients based off their API. So are they also chatGPT or the model they specifically trained and aligned for chat?
- chatmasta 4y agoFrom a branding perspective I'm not sure it's even clear what ChatGPT is. If GPT-3 is ChatGPT, then what is GPT-4?
- sebzim4500 4y agoI think ChatGPT is just the web ui. So you are using ChatGPT no matter what model it is using. Note that the API docs refer to the chat api as the "OpenAI Chat API" and not the "ChatGPT API".
- addisonl 4y agoOpenAI has chatGPT, a chatbot, that is powered their line of GPT models: GPT-3.5-turbo originally and GPT-4 being the latest. chatGPT went down and is still down as seen on chat.openai.com and status.openai.com OpenAI also has an API which includes chat completion (using GPT models), image generation (DALL-E 2), and more. This has also been down this morning and is still super spotty. Other websites using “GPT” in their name are probably using their GPT models through their API and/or are riding on chatGPT’s incredible success and public exposure.
- bcjordan 4y agoIt sounds a lot like a cache issue (CDN caching something from the API layer? new cache sharding? run out of keyspace?). In addition to users reporting other users' summaries, this user and two others report seeing someone else's email address in their pay-to-upgrade flow: https://old.reddit.com/r/ChatGPT/comments/11wkw5z/has_chatgpt_or_me_been_hacked_ive_never_had_these/jcyhyit/ https://old.reddit.com/r/ChatGPT/comments/11wkw5z/has_chatgp... > When I'm finally able to get the option to upgrade to Plus to work, the contact email is not the email address I used to subscribe. And you can't change it. > EDIT: Got it to load again, and it's a completely different email address now. If I pay, who am I paying for? Which all makes me feel like this could be APIs getting over-cached. Incident status at https://status.openai.com/incidents/jq9232rcmktd https://status.openai.com/incidents/jq9232rcmktd > We are investigating an issue with the ChatGPT web experience. I swear every successful web company has had their cache leaking issues moment right after they've hit product market fit and began scaling up. They've made the big time!
- AgentME 4y agoThis issue pops up somewhat commonly with web services that decide to add a reverse-proxy CDN but don't put the "Cache-Control: private" header on all HTTP endpoints that return data specific to the logged in user.
- nobrains 4y agoSQL injection for LLLM
- EdSharkey 4y agoDid any of you catch my kid's chat title: "Funny office fart story"?
- andrewstuart 4y agoAll my chat history vanished and never came back.
- pxtail 4y agoJust like tears in rain
- tagyro 4y agoI started to build an iOS client for the "Open"AI API and, while playing with the end-points and the "stream" option, I managed to send an empty prompt. Imagine my surprise when I got back instructions on how to install Roblox. While I understand that any data sent doesn't fall under GDPR protection and the prompts on the chat interface might be used for future training, I was under the impression, based on their data usage policy (https://openai.com/policies/api-data-usage-policies https://openai.com/policies/api-data-usage-policies) that they don't use data submitted via the API for training. After this incident, I'm having second doubts. On a somewhat related topic, would it be possible to send a prompt to the API in an obfuscated manner, which would be unreadable by a human, but that the neural network can parse (and reply to)?
- vagabund 4y agoDoes not necessarily inspire confidence that the organization which self-describes their AI containment challenge as an existential threat to humanity can't secure users' chat histories.
- thaeli 4y agoJust emphasizes how much the "existential threat" stuff is a scare tactic to advocate for regulatory capture.
- circuit10 4y agoIt is a real concern that we need to take seriously
- sebzim4500 4y agoIs there any evidence that OpenAI (or any of the big tech companies) are pushing for AI regulation? Seems to me like they instead using it as an excuse to keep all the details as a trade secret, despite their name.
- ChatGTP 4y agoIt's a nice card to have up your sleeve. Likely regulation is coming.
- benlivengood 4y agoDoes it matter? None of the chats are private and OpenAI logs all of them.
- simonw 4y agoHow are the chats not private? OpenAI logging them for debugging and analytical purposes is VERY different from OpenAI making them visible to other users.
- skybrian 4y agoYou're interacting with a system that makes up plausible data. When it screws up, it's still going to make up plausible data. It's of course plausible that it's real data, but you can't easily tell by looking at it. This is going to make understanding bugs from the outside more difficult. It's sort of like a built-in honeypot.
- paxys 4y agoOof. OpenAI running into the familiar drawbacks of "move fast and break things".
- steve_adams_86 4y agoI get that this isn't a trivial service to scale and deploy, but the $20/month fee to use ChatGPT reliably is one of the most unreliable and low-value products I subscribe to. It's basically a toy, and while I'm curious to learn to use it effectively and understand how it might fit into my workflows, I can't help but feel like I'm doing them more of a favour than they are me. It's kind of like ChatGPT Plus is more on the tier of a donation than a legitimate product. Apart from being unreliable, the user interface and experience overall is not that great despite being very simple in its requirements. Things break all the time, user sessions seem to break in unclear ways, now I suppose people are getting the wrong history entries. I want to keep using it in order to learn, but I really dislike paying for such a poorly implemented service. I suppose since there's nothing else like it, we just have to put up with it for the time being.
- sourcecodeplz 4y agoI am very happy with the free 3.5 version. Sometimes I use the Bing version for live data.
- hansvm 4y agoThe API is cheaper (up to around 330 in-depth queries per day), more powerful, easier to use, by definition not subject to the whims of history unavailability, and doesn't seem to be down when the web platform is down. I wasted half a day making a nice frontend, but it was unaffected by today's outage and got better results than when I was restricted to the web UI.
- MacsHeadroom 4y ago>The API is cheaper Not for GPT-4 it isn't.
- seba_dos1 4y ago> Things break all the time, user sessions seem to break in unclear ways, now I suppose people are getting the wrong history entries. Perhaps the UI has been made by GPT itself.
- 4y ago
- bluedays 4y agoI had ChatGPT help be write a Dr Seuss d&d campaign. If someone sees it let me know what you think. I especially love the part about the media portraying rebels embracing the term about buttering their toast upside down
- hrpnk 4y agoI wonder why the chat history isn't persisted in the browser storage and synced just for analytics. Having R/W access via API isn't privacy friendly as we can see. Plus, it's also expensive to scale.