3 ms·
Your car should not be responsible for enforcing the law. That’s the point.
by lurquer 4y ago
Your car should not be responsible for enforcing the law.
That’s the point.
- flangola7 4y agoIt's enforcing the law it's preventing tangible harm from occurring. There are people that disliked seatbelts and their restrictions at first too.
- oceanplexian 4y agoTaken to its ultimate conclusion we’ll end up living in pods like Wall-E. God forbid people experience danger or risk in any aspect of their lives.
- flangola7 4y ago"Turn off the radio when someone is unbuckled" is not an excessive or unusual precaution. Don't be so dramatic and hysterical.
- Dylan16807 4y agoIt's very unusual!
- lurquer 4y ago[flagged]
- mwigdahl 4y agoWhat tangible harm did turning off the radio prevent in OP's case?
- BoorishBears 4y agoI'm not passing judgement on the radio turning off, I'm just saying: calling out leaving a dog unrestrained as "pretty reckless" isn't that off base. Some people will browbeat you over topics that they personally don't care that much about, just so they can feel good about themselves: I agree with that. But I think people tend to really do feel pretty strongly about the unrestrained dog thing. At the end of the day it's your life, your dog, we all take risks, etc. etc. but it's still an uneasy thing to think about how it can go wrong