3 ms·

Yes, I skimmed through that and was surprised to see it be compared to Django. It's different. Django is for building CRUD apps quickly. That's it. It's not fo

by winrid 4y ago

Yes, I skimmed through that and was surprised to see it be compared to Django. It's different. Django is for building CRUD apps quickly. That's it. It's not for the long haul of super complicated apps, which many projects don't ever reach before they fail/get abandoned.

Frog0fWar 4y ago
I agree that there are better options for long-term maintenance of large projects, but let's not act like Youtube or Instagram don't exist - both of which used Django to some (high at the beginning) degree.
Daishiman 4y ago
99% of line-of-business apps are CRUD. There's nothing special about "super complicated apps" that isn't brought in by the Python ecosystem. Where exactly do you think Django fails in that regard?
- winrid 4y ago
  I love Django. I just think Python without types makes things hard at scale.
  - Daishiman 4y ago
    MyPy and friends have made this much, much better. In the long term it's probably not ideal for very large systems in many applications.
    - winrid 4y ago
      I've been using it with an IDE and it's quite nice. I'll probably be using Django for a lot of future projects.