2 ms·
Simply allowing someone to do this could violate the court's order, is the point. Maybe detangle should give a summary on the kind of documents it can help with
by freejazz 4y ago
Simply allowing someone to do this could violate the court's order, is the point. Maybe detangle should give a summary on the kind of documents it can help with and how to identify them, if it's going to pretend to be anything like a lawyer.
- adamsmith143 4y agoI'd question if that would hold up in court. Can the court order also be violated if I burn a contract and use the ashes to grow vegetables? Presumably about as much information in the contract is extractable from the vegetable as from a NN weight.
- freejazz 4y agoIf you gave the contract to someone (to burn) when the court order prohibited giving it to a non-party, yes, absolutely. No need to be obtuse about it and to fight the hypo. It isn't entirely unusual for a contract in a litigation to be marked as attorney's eyes only, or highly confidential, and for there to be a protective order limiting the distribution of such documents. Also would not be unusual for a party to produce such a document in the discovery process, to which a protective order would also apply.
- amelius 4y agoTransformer based models have been shown to reproduce training text verbatim.