5 ms·
I voted No because this is the most interesting content to come out of Twitter in years and the spice must flow. It would've been fine if he published planned
by TheAceOfHearts 4y ago
I voted No because this is the most interesting content to come out of Twitter in years and the spice must flow.
It would've been fine if he published planned policy changes and asked the community for feedback before putting it in place. But actually making random policy changes and then rolling it back hours later is such bad form. The latest policy changes were so half-assed and dumb that it makes me wonder what's going through his head. Doesn't he have anyone helping to bounce ideas around?
If he steps down, who do you think he'll chose as his successor?
- quonn 4y agoI want my car to receive updates and support in the future and keep some resell value, so I voted "Yes" ...
- victor9000 4y agoNo clue how Tesla shareholders aren't sueing his ass already.
- bb88 4y agoI think that's coming -- as long as the Tesla stock keeps dropping like a rock.
- Danieru 4y agoThat might back fire. If Elon's focus shifts back to Tesla you might find yourself driving down the highway one day and your cars asks: "Do you promise to commit yourself to Tesla? Yes No?" Hurry; there is a parked white semi up ahead.
- yellow_lead 4y agoAnd if you announce your desire to switch cars you may get locked out of your Tesla
- amelius 4y ago> who do you think he'll chose as his successor? It will probably be another poll. With one option, him.
- trenchgun 4y agoBlake Masters.
- j_crick 4y agoLet’s up this a little bit to Eric Weinstein.
- memish 4y agoThat would work. It's hard to think of a better choice.
- j_crick 4y agoLet’s try. I suggest Kalanick or Neumann!
- ProjectArcturis 4y agoWhat's Sam Bankman-Fried up to these days?
- jasonhansel 4y agoKanye?
- bilbo0s 4y agowho do you think he'll chose as his successor? And how long before he has another poll on whether or not to fire them? It's his thought process that is the problem. I feel Twitter would have died Elon, or no Elon. But this sort of spectacular flameout ending is really what Elon brings to the table because his leadership style does not lend itself to stability.
- slaw 4y agoElon Musk. He could step down and ascend.
- 6510 4y agomc hammer
- neonate 4y agoDavid Sacks?
- sf_rob 4y agoLikely and somehow even worse. Edit: Actually, Elon doesn’t seem to do polls without wanting an outcome and his follow up “Careful what you wish for” would support Sacks.
- riffic 4y agosame, I've been longing for the collapse of Twitter for years. the federated social web will outlive this.
- layer8 4y agoI voted Yes because too many people’s time is being wasted with all that drama.
- abnry 4y agoI voted Yes because I want someone who has principles and doesn't act on personal whim.
- cactusplant7374 4y ago> No one wants the job who can actually keep Twitter alive. There is no successor. https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1604628761395138561?s=46&t=kzukDiwM4jXaZGsVG1Jpvg https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1604628761395138561?s=46... Still playing games.
- williamsmj 4y agoAlso voted no. Every minute he spends torching his reputation as CEO of a company he personally owns is good for the world.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- barbariangrunge 4y agoAs a non Twitter user, I’m curious how this social experiment will play out. Twitter has been a pit of outrage, fuelling mobs to attack people for so long — will this new version of it be any worse? I’m curious to find out (from the sidelines)
- ajaimk 4y agoI just want to watch the world burn
- Apocryphon 4y agoJohn Carmack isn't doing anything, give it to him.
- meepmorp 4y agomoot
- OhioMan2943 4y agoI also voted no, as I hope more mistakes lead to a wider adoption of decentralised social media