6 ms·
Of who? What is he famous for?
by superchroma 4y ago
Of who? What is he famous for?
- ohiovr 4y ago[flagged]
- Yiin 4y ago[flagged]
- peteradio 4y agoThe latest bivalent booster was released without testing except on mice. I understand the apprehension to believe it.
- slater 4y agoI wonder if there was any reason it was released without testing except on mice?
- naikrovek 4y ago[flagged]
- ralph84 4y agoIf mRNA vaccines are so extremely well understood, why was so much misinformation spread by public health officials about them? We were told: - The mRNA and spike protein break down within a few days. Now studies are finding them still in the body months later and the CDC silently memory-holed the statement on their site about them being short-lived. - The mRNA and spike protein remain localized to the injection site. Now studies are finding them all over the body. - The spike protein is harmless. Now studies are finding it's toxic.
- throwaway5959 4y agoSource on any of those claims?
- Commodore63 4y agoYes? Because trials would make the formulation less timely, and therefore less efficacious. They've done this on the flu shot for YEARS. Or are you implying that a reason for fast tracking must necessarily be nefarious?
- tazedsoul 4y agoSomething doesn’t have to be necessarily true for it to have a high probability of being true.
- Commodore63 4y agoA vast conspiracy theory involving tens of thousands of actors isn't possible.
- peteradio 4y agoTens of thousands of people show up to bag groceries each day, doesn't make it a vast conspiracy. Some peoples job is to do bad science and shill for big pharma, go figure.
- drewrv 4y agoThe big reason is to make it available before the fall, when people spend more time indoors and spread it more. Also you don't really need to test it, it's known to be safer than the disease.
- someotherpersom 4y ago
- drewrv 4y agoIf your claim is that "the vaccine" was only tested on mice and you don't clarify that you're only talking about the updated variant, not the original, then you're being purposefully misleading.
- aliswe 4y agoUh ... Im pro vax, and vaxxed, but this is pretty shocking. Take a look from the other side for a second.
- dekhn 4y agoSorry, no, it's completely accurate to say the new FDA boosters weren't tested on humans. Period. I'm not complaining that this happened (deliberate tradeoff) but it definitely did occur and people saying that are not necessarily being misleading.
- drewrv 4y agoYes I agree that it's accurate to say "the new FDA boosters weren't tested on humans"! My point is that if you leave out "the new FDA boosters" then you're being misleading. It's important context.
- no-dr-onboard 4y agoHe's a highly published and referenced, board licensed cardiologist. From his website: > Dr. McCullough has broadly published on a range of topics in medicine with > 1000 publications and > 600 citations in the National Library of Medicine. . . Dr. McCullough is a founder and current president of the Cardiorenal Society of America, an organization dedicated to bringing cardiologists and nephrologists together to work on the emerging problem of cardiorenal syndromes. His works have appeared in the New England Journal of Medicine, Journal of the American Medical Association, Lancet, British Medical Journal and other top-tier journals worldwide.
- brnt 4y agoMDs with hundreds or thousands of publications is usually not a good sign. Factory scientists tend to publish too many tiny or extremely incremental studies. I know of one who's expert at smearing the results of a study over half dozen papers.
- Commodore63 4y ago[flagged]
- zackees 4y agoNatural infection gives broad spectrum protection against multiple antigens present on SarsCov2. The mRNA vaccines took the toxic part, the spike protein, and gave that to everyone, but only after Pfizer gave themselves full immunity for any damage it caused.