no-dr-onboard

6 ms·

1.
by no-dr-onboard 7mo ago
I normally don't respond to bad faith responses like this, but I found the following quote pretty funny: > Even if I grant moral objectivity, I reject that you have epistemic access to it so it's moot. This is a silly and self
2.
by no-dr-onboard 7mo ago
A lot of your argument presupposes a distinct lack of parental authority in the education of a child. The way that it appears to be playing out is that parents were repulsed by perverted and strange worldviews being taught to their childre
3.
by no-dr-onboard 7mo ago
Not op, but GitLab fits the form.
4.
by no-dr-onboard 7mo ago
That’s a good question. Assuming a righteous and just government: The government couldn’t justify the killing of innocent civilians. The government couldn’t justify the killing of the unborn. The government couldn’t justify eugenics. There
5.
by no-dr-onboard 7mo ago
The government has a responsibility to protect its constituents. Sometimes that requires collaboration. This isn’t hard.
6.
by no-dr-onboard 7mo ago
Your argument makes sense to me and changed my mind. Thank you.
7.
by no-dr-onboard 7mo ago
A lot of these are actually grandfathered in. Vulcanization, electrolysis, auto painting, etc. I think the emphasis is that CA has effectively made it difficult to get regulatory authorities to agree to issue new permits. That was the part
8.
by no-dr-onboard 7mo ago
Maybe reworded as “He has skin in the game” > so obviously his point can’t be true > so obviously he’s biased and we can’t do the mental work of sifting > so obviously I can dismiss this as teleologically false. Please don’t be so
9.
by no-dr-onboard 7mo ago
“Yes you can” misses the point. But you’ll incur heavy taxes, huge COB increases, tightening regulatory scrutiny and all for nothing compared to being just one or two states over. It’s has been one economically and morally disadvantageous t
10.
by no-dr-onboard 8mo ago
(plot twist: he works for NSA contractors)
11.
by no-dr-onboard 9mo ago
Just saw this. Hope you feel better. It seems you were really going through it when you wrote this.
12.
by no-dr-onboard 9mo ago
I'm a principal at a non-fang company. Throughout my tenure however, I've worked at roughly half of the FAANG companies back when people thought of them as synonymous with excellence. The jury is still out as to what that really m
13.
by no-dr-onboard 9mo ago
Toobin had many words. Most of them were onomatopoeias.
14.
by no-dr-onboard 9mo ago
You know, I think you're right. I recant what I said earlier. I actually don't think I should care about this matter at all. In a more general sense, it seems best to me that people should just mind their own business and settle t
15.
by no-dr-onboard 9mo ago
I don't think I would ever "have blood on my hands" in my current position as a software developer because Gotham and Foundry have valid and real world use cases that are being implemented in ways that actually make people
16.
by no-dr-onboard 9mo ago
I'd like to invite you to prove any three of your points.
17.
by no-dr-onboard 9mo ago
That's a pretty broad generalization, but OK I'll bite. - I think Yarvin has a lot of good points. No one should be ashamed to admit the truth of a matter. I can't stand his voice, I think he has annoying mannerisms, but none
18.
by no-dr-onboard 9mo ago
> sparkfun chose to publish a vague public accusation. once you do that, speculation is inevitable. Ok sure, but the explanation provided strikes me as equally vague. I don't think anyone who isn't familiar with this situation
19.
by no-dr-onboard 9mo ago
Yeah this is how I read it as well.
20.
by no-dr-onboard 1y ago
I see this quite a bit with Rust. I honestly cringe when people get up in arms about someone taking their project out of the rust community. The same can be said of books as of programming languages: "Not every ___ deserves to be read&
21.
by no-dr-onboard 1y ago
"Why do you think individuals deserve universal basic income?"
22.
by no-dr-onboard 1y ago
100% reproducible? That's amazing. I'll be honest, I don't really believe you (which I suppose is the point, right?). Do you all document how you got around system level sources of non-determinism? Filesystems, metadata, time
23.
by no-dr-onboard 1y ago
Hm, it turns out suggesting that someone buy a suit for a job they need is a litmus test.
24.
by no-dr-onboard 1y ago
> Literally the only thing on the client could be a session cookie. You know, about 7 years ago I would have heartily agreed with you. KISS, right? The thing is, it just doesn't make financial, UX, or security sense to do that. The
25.
by no-dr-onboard 1y ago
I keep coming back to this phrase used in this post: "it was scary". Yeah, hiring is scary. Hiring is insanely expensive on all fronts. Firing people is difficult, it's expensive and legally exposing. Hiring the wrong person,
26.
by no-dr-onboard 2y ago
I think this is a very sane and sober line of reasoning. I'd actually go further and actually say that there is actually very little that European counterparts can offer to American interests. Even less in the ways of sensibilities. Th
27.
by no-dr-onboard 2y ago
read this as "ogress", thinking it was some new variant of postgresql. My mind has been destroyed by HN!
28.
by no-dr-onboard 2y ago
Hi, former pentester here. If any one of your trusted clients is using a google/chromium based browser, the telemetry from that browser (webdiscovery) would reveal the existence of the subdomain in question. As others have said, secur
29.
by no-dr-onboard 2y ago
How so?
30.
by no-dr-onboard 2y ago
There are many different ways to read your comment. Both of which are actually pretty funny. Well done.

More ›