3 ms·
> The title of the paper is: This isn't what people aren't usually interested in. Saving time by providing interesting conclusions at-a-glance is sensible. I
by Supermancho 4y ago
> The title of the paper is:
This isn't what people aren't usually interested in. Saving time by providing interesting conclusions at-a-glance is sensible.
I do see how the conclusions have been editorialized away from the actual findings, for no apparent reason.
- walrus01 4y agoIt's almost as if we've become socially accustomed to editorialized social media shared headlines that are intentionally crafted as rage bait to drive clicks and engagement for advertising revenue. Gee, I sure do wonder how and where that might have happened...
- antegamisou 4y agoI've been saying for the past year, sensationalist submissions like the OP to the front-page are the norm on "H"N. Quite disappointing, considering I believed this website was once a source for high-quality information, but now it's almost as if I'm logging in on my LinkedIn home page.
- scott_s 4y agoFrom the HN guidelines (https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html): > Otherwise please use the original title, unless it is misleading or linkbait; don't editorialize.
- koheripbal 4y agoOP's title highlights women - when the effect is for all people. It's heavily misleading.
- Supermancho 4y ago> It's heavily misleading. Most people think this is obvious. I'm still wondering why it hasn't been corrected. Instead, it got yanked.