antegamisou

5 ms·

1.
by antegamisou 7mo ago
Least delusional HN user/bot.
2.
by antegamisou 7mo ago
Ragebait comment for sure, but not everyone lives in some bubble where $14/months is spare change and anyway the fact that even a philosophical wall of text on why paying for something so fundamental like not getting spammed with reta
3.
by antegamisou 11mo ago
> If everyone makes noise about how the other side hasn't quieted down yet so they won't the only outcome is it gets ever louder Yes, we shouldn't be pointing out the low-value content and enshittification brought upon by
4.
by antegamisou 11mo ago
Not everyone writes trivial frontend or sysadmins for a living.
5.
by antegamisou 11mo ago
Yeah you can count on my reticence, everything seem to be going back to normal. Oh wait what is that?! https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45917875 Another low volume slop news day! Maybe I'm more influential than I p
6.
by antegamisou 11mo ago
No it means you can still discern what is BS.
7.
by antegamisou 11mo ago
> you say LLMs mislead people and can't reason Why would you postulate these two to be mutually exclusive? > then fault them for being good at helping people solve puzzles or win trivia games They only help them in the same sense
8.
by antegamisou 11mo ago
As of 1763032813 the current GPT5.1 has amassed a significant amount of comments to be considered low volume. Sadly I only see my suspicions being confirmed but yeah I'll play along with the HN is the best corner of the Internet narr
9.
by antegamisou 11mo ago
[Someone from the moderation team care to explain the reasoning behind flagging this comment?] Your judgement concerning the state of the website since the release of GPT3 is flawed. Just take a look at the amount of comments on non-AI topi
10.
by antegamisou 11mo ago
[Someone from the moderation team care to explain the reasoning behind flagging this comment?] Characterizing as grossly inappropriate the statement of the reality of the monopoly on research funding on useless -as of now- AI and not even
11.
by antegamisou 11mo ago
The whole frontpage has been infested with LLM BS for a very long time with absurd claims about it being of landing-on-the-moon levels of breakthrough yet here you are claiming the ones pointing out this fact are the problem.
12.
by antegamisou 11mo ago
And what's the end result? All one can see is just bigger representation of those who confidently subscribe to false information and become arrogant when their validity is questioned, as the LLM writing style has convinced them it&#x27
13.
by antegamisou 11mo ago
I don't think you'll find many here believing anything outside tech is worth investing into, it's schizophrenic isn't it.
14.
by antegamisou 11mo ago
Honestly this (the fact it is being massively upvoted) looks a lot more like paid promotion. Not the first time and not the only example of submission btw.
15.
by antegamisou 11mo ago
> Risk of Physical Harm Yet ChatGPT is not responsible for having led to suicides.
16.
by antegamisou 11mo ago
If one were to only go by the number of comments this thread has ended up amassing, you'd reckon they would consist of endless wandering mental gymnastics about semantics, iamverysmart suppositions that the statement in the title is
17.
by antegamisou 11mo ago
What makes the linked study not cherrypicked?
18.
by antegamisou 11mo ago
> Dr Bloom spoke about how your overall mood during college is a good predictor for how happy you'll be as a person throughout your life. He talked about the optimum time to get married is 26. He elucidated the idea of your prefront
19.
by antegamisou 11mo ago
Yeah I also feel introducing some social class - income level variable would help clear things up.
20.
by antegamisou 11mo ago
> I would rather call "annoying self-centered people who are often very concerned about their public image (i.e. narcists)". You're essentially describing almost the entire online dating userbase here though. How are peopl
21.
by antegamisou 11mo ago
> I think there are certain basic psychological facts that are anti-standard-economics that nerds (and therefore tech companies) almost always tend to be completely blind to. This is one of them. I believe it's the opposite, they&#x
22.
by antegamisou 11mo ago
Yes, it's entirely possible to disagree with the misinterpretation of an otherwise as-objectively-as-possible true sentence. It seems like you're holding onto your initial position, applying the factually true statement: no
23.
by antegamisou 11mo ago
This is quite a stretch of mental gymnastics from the initial point, drawing a blatantly false equivalency between the consumer and the producer as an at attempt to derail and minimize the latter's direct contribution to the forced une
24.
by antegamisou 11mo ago
> Am I missing something here? The fact that all of the above is being presented as an exclusively Russian strategy. When almost all companies mentioned on this website are proudly and directly tied to non-Russian war industries. The ten
25.
by antegamisou 11mo ago
Thank God all other non-Russian companies not only condemn various atrocities around the globe but even support the affected countries being liberated by developing the high-tech armies of the good guys, right?!
26.
by antegamisou 11mo ago
Europoors seething they can't afford ad-ridden fridges. /s
27.
by antegamisou 11mo ago
Any billionaire-regulated (N"P"R my ass) major news media company accusing other billionaire-owned major news media companies of bias is being hypocritical.
28.
by antegamisou 11mo ago
I don't know if you deliberately skipped the 90% of other inventions that had nothing to do with -mind you- defense from American imperialism or you're being dense on purpose. Probably both? Anyway just glancing the respective pa
29.
by antegamisou 11mo ago
The grandparent comment shouldn't be wondering about anything now, should they....
30.
by antegamisou 11mo ago
This has to be the most American thing I've ever read: the cognitive dissonance of the disconnect between income inequality and political systems.

More ›