4 ms·

The explanation seems contradictitory. Initially it says "Breathing deeply does, however, release lot of CO2". Later it says "By removing CO2 from the blood thr

The explanation seems contradictitory. Initially it says "Breathing deeply does, however, release lot of CO2". Later it says "By removing CO2 from the blood through deep breathing ....".

kuhewa 4y ago
Releasing CO2 from the cardiopulmonary system is removing it from the blood, no contradiction.
- sateesh 4y ago
  This won't happen if you are holding your breath, right.
  - kuhewa 4y ago
    Depends on the balance of deep breath and breath hold. At the end of the day if the overall air exchanged is greater than necessary to maintain balanced CO2 levels, for example if you are deep breathing and pausing in between but not long enough to offset the amount of air exchanged, you could still be driving a net decrease in CO2 levels. However if you are breath holding until the urge to breath arises, which is driven by rising CO2, then yeah you are probably offsetting the effect of the deep breathing.
- amelius 4y ago
  And how does deep breathing remove CO2 from the blood?
  - kuhewa 4y ago
    Breathing removes CO2 generally. But when you are breathing normally, i.e. letting the autonomic nervous system control the breathing rate at tidal volume (the amount of air exchanged in a normal breath), the rate of purging CO2 is equal to the rate it is produced by cellular respiration so you have a normal physiological amount of CO2 in circulation. If you intentionally breath deeply, greater than tidal volume, it means at the same breathing rate, you are exchanging more air in total and will be purging more CO2 than you produce which will lead to hypocapnia over time. Hypocapnia doesn't inherently need to result from deep breathing if you offset the greater-than-tidal volume with less-than-normal breath rate — if you are breathing very slow or 'skip' breathing with pauses in between, but that balance can be pretty hard to reach
drjasonharrison 4y ago
It's confusing to me too because if the blood is 99% saturated with oxygen is there only 1% CO2? Is hyperventilating getting to 100% or further? Are we talking about the same numbers as a (calibrated) O2 optical saturation monitor reports or something else?
- deleted 4y ago
  [deleted]
- nradov 4y ago
  Hyperventilation doesn't significantly increase blood oxygen saturation. A healthy person near sea level will already be close to 100% so there's no room for increase. This is normally measured using an optical sensor. Blood O2 and CO2 percentages don't sum to 100%. O2 saturation refers to the percentage of hemoglobin molecules which have oxygen bound. Only some CO2 is transported bound to hemoglobin.

The explanation seems contradictitory. Initially it says "Breathing deeply does, however, release lot of CO2". Later it says "By removing CO2 from the blood through deep breathing ....".

kuhewa 4y ago

Releasing CO2 from the cardiopulmonary system is removing it from the blood, no contradiction.

sateesh 4y ago
This won't happen if you are holding your breath, right.
- kuhewa 4y ago
  Depends on the balance of deep breath and breath hold. At the end of the day if the overall air exchanged is greater than necessary to maintain balanced CO2 levels, for example if you are deep breathing and pausing in between but not long enough to offset the amount of air exchanged, you could still be driving a net decrease in CO2 levels. However if you are breath holding until the urge to breath arises, which is driven by rising CO2, then yeah you are probably offsetting the effect of the deep breathing.
amelius 4y ago
And how does deep breathing remove CO2 from the blood?
- kuhewa 4y ago
  Breathing removes CO2 generally. But when you are breathing normally, i.e. letting the autonomic nervous system control the breathing rate at tidal volume (the amount of air exchanged in a normal breath), the rate of purging CO2 is equal to the rate it is produced by cellular respiration so you have a normal physiological amount of CO2 in circulation. If you intentionally breath deeply, greater than tidal volume, it means at the same breathing rate, you are exchanging more air in total and will be purging more CO2 than you produce which will lead to hypocapnia over time. Hypocapnia doesn't inherently need to result from deep breathing if you offset the greater-than-tidal volume with less-than-normal breath rate — if you are breathing very slow or 'skip' breathing with pauses in between, but that balance can be pretty hard to reach

drjasonharrison 4y ago

It's confusing to me too because if the blood is 99% saturated with oxygen is there only 1% CO2? Is hyperventilating getting to 100% or further? Are we talking about the same numbers as a (calibrated) O2 optical saturation monitor reports or something else?

deleted 4y ago
[deleted]
nradov 4y ago
Hyperventilation doesn't significantly increase blood oxygen saturation. A healthy person near sea level will already be close to 100% so there's no room for increase. This is normally measured using an optical sensor. Blood O2 and CO2 percentages don't sum to 100%. O2 saturation refers to the percentage of hemoglobin molecules which have oxygen bound. Only some CO2 is transported bound to hemoglobin.