8 ms·

They define upper-middle as a household earning between 75k-127k. But, before that, they mention that a member of the upper-middle class, Mr. Yu, purchased a ne

They define upper-middle as a household earning between 75k-127k. But, before that, they mention that a member of the upper-middle class, Mr. Yu, purchased a new home, a duplex, and an 8-unit apartment complex during the pandemic. Is there any wonder he’s getting squeezed? He’s trying to play outside of his league using other people’s money. The real story is that the “upper middle class” played too fast and loose at the top of the longest bull market in decades and now reality is setting in.

dinobones 4y ago
Upper middle class as a household earning between 75k-127k is pretty surprising to me. Here in Phoenix, $127k is about the household earning you need to afford a 4 bedroom home ~500k/~2500 mortgage). I wouldn’t consider that an upper middle class lifestyle.
- swagasaurus-rex 4y ago
  Yeah, seems low to me. The multimillion dollar houses I think about when I think successful high-paying career for upper middle class seem to be out of reach for that income bracket.
  - AnimalMuppet 4y ago
    I think your perspective is off. To me, "multimillion dollar houses" are upper class, not upper middle class.
    - corrral 4y ago
      People use "upper middle" to mean different things. Some use it to mean the upper portion of the middle class, by income. Others use it to mean a distinct (and much smaller) class between the middle and upper, with distinct tendencies and preferences, comprising people who live something close to a "rich" lifestyle but are distinguished from the actually-rich by having to work to maintain it, rather than being able to live a very nice life off investment income alone. Doctors, lawyers, other very-well-paid white-collar types, constituting perhaps a single-digit percentage of the population. I'm not sure which, if any, definition has a credible claim to being, in some sense, most-correct.
    - Cookingboy 4y ago
      It depends on context. A household of two earners working for big techs living in a $2M home in Bay Area is definitely comfortable, but by no means upper class. Most of their incomes are still from a W2 form and they still have to budget for kids' school, retirement, etc.
      - refurb 4y ago
        Owning a $2M home in the most expensive area of the US is upper class.
    - deleted 4y ago
      [deleted]
- lampshades 4y ago
  That’s what I was thinking. I was riding around a few days ago thinking, “what is considered the middle class?” And I definitely would consider this range around it. Maybe I’m just out of touch with the situation but 75k for a household seems like borderline poverty.
  - BirAdam 4y ago
    In the “deep South” middle income would start below 75k.
    - lampshades 4y ago
      Funnily enough, I live in the “Deep South”.
      - BirAdam 4y ago
        drive out to a rural area and ask ppl their household income, not a boomer retiree, but a middle aged couple with a few kids. averages: georgia 61980 tennessee 54665 alabama 51734 south carolina 56227 now, people with these incomes would have a house and a car or two. they would shop at regular stores and do more or less okay until quite recently with inflation. to put this in a more real sense, in several of these states, you could until 2019 find large (around 1300 sqft) two bedroom apartments for less than 1k/mo if you left major cities out of your search. if you wanted to buy a home, you could get one at around 2000 sqft for less than 200k.
  - lotsofpulp 4y ago
    It depends how you define things. I find it more useful to talk about “security” than “class”. Are you or do you feel secure in your ability to secure shelter? Water? Food? Transportation? Land? Education? Healthcare? Retirement income? Vacation? Disability income? Legal services? Ability to give friends and family money? Permits and political access/favors? I doubt any household with $75k income in the US is securing their retirement, or even healthcare.
    - 4y ago
- badcppdev 4y ago
  Can you quickly give your definitions for different classes. Salary bands and lifestyles?
  - throwaway0a5e 4y ago
    Upper class -> buys land/property/house, (solidly 6+ figure stuff) to signal an image to others in their class Upper middle class -> selects their car or children's education (5, sometimes just brushing 6, figure stuff) to project an image to others in their class Middle class -> selects their clothes and consumer goods (2-3, occasionally 4 figure stuff) to project an image to others in their class Roughly speaking, of course.
  - slowmovintarget 4y ago
    For salary bands, Wikipedia does a better job for middle class as opposed to middle income, which the article seems to deliberately conflate. Middle income is near the floor of the income range of the "middle class." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Middle_class#/media/File:Global_Wealth_Distribution_2020_(Property).svg https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Middle_class#/media/File:Globa...
  - sosuke 4y ago
    Upper class: makes money with money Upper middle class: has a job and alternate income source, doesn't even consider not taking a family vacation Middle class: has a job, doesn't worry about root canal or car repair, saves money for a family vacation Lower middle class: has a job with healthcare, barely past paycheck to paycheck Below that: has multiple part time jobs or full time hourly position, each check is already spent
    - spaceman_2020 4y ago
      This sounds about right
- jibe 4y ago
  I agree, it looks low, especially in cities with high housing prices. Looking at income distribution, you'd think a floor for upper middle would be at least 100k for a household. https://www.statista.com/statistics/203183/percentage-distribution-of-household-income-in-the-us/ https://www.statista.com/statistics/203183/percentage-distri...
- darkwizard42 4y ago
  $127K household income in NYC will qualify you for rent-stabilized apartments... so this seems very off in terms of measurement for larger cities
  - dehrmann 4y ago
    Reminds me of Covid stimulus checks that that median Silicon Valley househould didn't qualify for.
- everforward 4y ago
  I would guess that they're defining "upper middle class" via income quintiles rather than via lifestyle. Those numbers roughly line up with the boundaries for the 4th quintile in 2017, 77k-126k. 2020's fourth quintile was 85k-141k. > I wouldn’t consider that an upper middle class lifestyle. I don't know that the conceptual upper middle class lifestyle actually matches the reality anymore. I think that's true of most quintiles. The upper middle class lives like the middle class used to, the middle class lives like the lower middle class used to, etc. That "upper middle class lifestyle" upshifted and is the domain of the lower rungs of the top quintile now.
  - corrral 4y ago
    Definitions for this are all over the place. Fussell's "upper middle class" lifestyle couldn't be stably maintained by households under the top quintile (probably not under the top 10%, even), nor could the upper-middle (also upper, but largely upper-middle) described in the jokey-but-fairly-accurate Official Preppy Handbook, and those books are ~40 years old now. For one thing, both paint decent-or-better private prep school as key for that class, and that's never really been within the reach of the lower four quintiles, to say nothing of the other things you'll need to spend money on to stay in that class.
  - danaris 4y ago
    And this is, in fact, the realized effect of the squeezing of the entire middle class over the past decades.
- slowmovintarget 4y ago
  These are not numbers I'm used to seeing when discussing middle class in the U.S. The middle class in the U.S. has income from $100K to $1M [1]. Middle class is not the same as middle income. The lower threshold for upper middle class is greater than $100K [2]. Are they using adjusted numbers perhaps? Adjusted to what? Ahh... The non-paywalled article uses "middle income" the moment it starts giving numbers, so the title is click-bait. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Middle_class https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Middle_class [2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Upper_middle_class https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Upper_middle_class
- robotburrito 4y ago
  It is upper middle class if everyone else around you is poorer than that no?
- tmaly 4y ago
  they forgot to adjust for inflation. I bet 100k today is roughly 50k in the year 2000.
  - memling 4y ago
    > I bet 100k today is roughly 50k in the year 2000. Mean inflation from 2000-2021 (last year on record) was ~2.24%, including a 4.7% increase in 2021.[1] $50k inflated at this rate would be approximately $80k. I'm sure others are more qualified to discuss implications, but consider that while inflation erodes nominal purchasing power, it cannot account for effectively deflationary impacts of technology (for an example, see[2]). Of course, we cannot eat technology, at least not exactly; so we probably want to look at metrics related to how easy it is to live. It might be worth looking at cost per calorie, for example, or for commonly-available proxies (e.g., fast food prices). [1] https://www.usinflationcalculator.com/inflation/historical-inflation-rates/ https://www.usinflationcalculator.com/inflation/historical-i... [2] In 1999, hard drives were sized in the hundreds of megabytes and cost more than they do today. See, i.a., https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_hard_disk_drives#2001_to_present https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_hard_disk_drives#20....
    - Foobar8568 4y ago
      Who cares about inflation if your rent/mortgage is 3 or 4 times higher?
      - memling 4y ago
        > Who cares about inflation if your rent/mortgage is 3 or 4 times higher? Oh, for sure: inflation is challenging to measure, and it probably isn't very descriptive for a lot of common situations. (I think the Consumer Price Index is an attempt to help solve this issue. CPI compounded about about 2.1% per year between 2000 and 2021.[1,2] The CPI includes measures of rent, but it also adjusts for seasonal changes.[3]) Inflation and CPI both obscure a lot of ground-level realities for people--the nature of all summary statistics is that they fail to capture the totality of reality in favor of giving us a broad sense for what's going on. Anecdotally my folks moved after their rent increased by 50% when their lease expired. (That was last year.) These are obviously nontrivial increases that have dramatic impacts on people. [1]: https://www.rateinflation.com/consumer-price-index/usa-historical-cpi/ https://www.rateinflation.com/consumer-price-index/usa-histo... [2]: (270.97/172.2)*(1/22.) ≈ 1.021 [3]: https://www.forbes.com/advisor/investing/cpi-consumer-price-index/ https://www.forbes.com/advisor/investing/cpi-consumer-price-...
sonotathrowaway 4y ago
I don’t think it’s really been proven that high inflation hurts the poor more than rich - wealthy people hate inflation as it eats into their returns on capital. They don’t make for sympathetic victims, but fortunately the WSJ has never been averse to changing facts to fit its narrative.
- BirAdam 4y ago
  This depends upon how much is required to be “rich”. The wealthiest people on Earth tend to use the most debt, and debt likes inflation. You pay off your debt with cheaper dollars. Additionally, it is precisely during periods of recession and/or inflation that we see the disparity between the wealthiest and poorest widen most quickly.
  - sonotathrowaway 4y ago
    > Building on the existing literature, we just published a working paper based on a sample of 10 OECD countries since 1970 that isolates the impact of inflation from other factors driving income inequality. > After accounting for the effect of other economic variables, we find a negative correlation between long term inflation and income inequality for low inflation rates. The results suggest that this link turns positive for higher inflation rates (i.e. above a threshold that we estimate at an inflation rate of 13%). These results are in line with other previous studies, which also find a U-shaped relationship between inflation and income inequality (Galli and van der Hoeven, 2001, Bulir, 2001, and Auda, 2010). However, they contradict the strong and widespread belief that inflation hurts the poor more than the rich and thus increases income inequality. https://www.cepweb.org/inflation-and-inequality/ https://www.cepweb.org/inflation-and-inequality/
    - BirAdam 4y ago
      I was using the superlative. “Wealthiest”. This is billionaires, not millionaires. Not merely rich, but the most rich.
- jibe 4y ago
  How can it not hurt poor people more? Food prices, gas prices, rent increases are things that are critical for survival for poor people. Rich person in a Tesla is not affected. If you are a minimum wage or near minimum wage earner, you have no margin to deal with price increases. We are talking about hurt in the sense of survival, not rich ppl crying about losing their stablecoin.
gopalv 4y ago
> they mention that a member of the upper-middle class, Mr. Yu, purchased a new home, a duplex, and an 8-unit apartment complex during the pandemic. A lot of people who though they were "comfortably rich" in the last couple of years are having a bad wake-up call that their loan interest or income was not as predictably favourable as they imagined. This is probably not the same thing as "being squeezed". That is what is known as a "mistake". It happens and one day it could happen to you, so don't laugh at the people going through it. None of us should be smug about it or do the "don't invest money you don't have" etc. What I take offense to in this article is the passive voice around it where "they get squeezed" instead of "I lost money". The same applies if you took a margin call in the last 6 months after borrowing against $AMZN and buying BTC with it. Does it suck, YES. Worse, you could owe the IRS money for the margin call sale. All of that said, there was a specific video that this guy reminded me of from "How Money Works". https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_INmFnlp-hU https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_INmFnlp-hU It specifically called out "Own a bunch of properties" as a "Buying yourself a new job", rather than being comfortable.
- RC_ITR 4y ago
  > That is what is known as a "mistake". It happens and one day it could happen to you, so don't laugh at the people going through it. Alternatively, it’s called “risk management” and people with conservative risk management feel the urge to laugh in the bad times because those with liberal risk management are often not afraid to brag about it during the good times.
  - drewcoo 4y ago
    Accepting more risk is not "liberal." There's no need to drag US politics into this.
    - egwynn 4y ago
      I didn’t read “conservative” or “liberal” as US political identifiers so much as synonyms for “risk averse” and “risk tolerant” respectively.
    - 4y ago
MattGaiser 4y ago
They start upper middle class here as close to the median household income. https://www.census.gov/library/publications/2021/demo/p60-273.html#:~:text=Median%20household%20income%20was%20%2467%2C521,median%20household%20income%20since%202011 https://www.census.gov/library/publications/2021/demo/p60-27.... It is probably at the median household income now.
Glyptodon 4y ago
I'm not sure about the definition, I suspect colloquial thought about "upper middle class" differs from being in the 60 to 80 range for household income when the 60 is within 10k of median household income. +~$7.5k to median should yield significant benefits long term, like a couple more easily maxing IRAs every year, but shouldn't be a giant leap in class, especially when distribution of wealth places average household income squarely in middle of the 60 - 80 band. That said, the example person they used isn't really paying for insane overextension - especially assuming rates are fixed and pre-rate-hike. He's paying because his living margins and costs are more impacted by inflation than his real-estate costs and now the cost of living margin he expected to be relatively stable is going away.
guyzero 4y ago
"They define upper-middle as a household earning between 75k-127k." I get that the SF Bay Area is its own little universe, but what? You're borderline homeless on that income.
- wincy 4y ago
  It is its own little universe and not representative of the majority of America. People I know who make silicon valley money by working remote coastal jobs and living here in Kansas all live in the nicest suburbs around, in 3-4,000 square foot McMansions with pools, and lawn care to mow their lush perfectly landscaped yards. These people are making probably 200k with a working spouse. They’re in the same salary bands as local doctors and attorneys. Quality of life based on income is very different in middle America.
  - guyzero 4y ago
    But doctors and lawyers are upper-middle aren't they?
    - wincy 4y ago
      Are they? I always thought of doctors and lawyers as the upper class. The people you’re likely to meet in country clubs and on the golf course, or who might run for political office (and actually win).
      - guyzero 4y ago
        They mostly rely on income from their labour, which makes them some strata of middle class. A law firm partner who doesn't do any work could be upper class, but those new law school grads are definitely not upper class.
sosuke 4y ago
I think trying to define class by income isn't possible. It should be defined by quality of life I think. That allows for relative lower middle and upper classes. Being a land owner and employer in a tiny town makes you relative upper class even if you're making 75k a year. While as someone else pointed out 127k a year in NYC qualifies you for rent-stabilized apartments, obviously not upper class.
_8j50 4y ago
Apparently I am upper middle class?? Lol, is this in 2007 dollars? I need to save at least for five years dilligently to afford a house.

dinobones 4y ago

Upper middle class as a household earning between 75k-127k is pretty surprising to me. Here in Phoenix, $127k is about the household earning you need to afford a 4 bedroom home ~500k/~2500 mortgage). I wouldn’t consider that an upper middle class lifestyle.

swagasaurus-rex 4y ago
Yeah, seems low to me. The multimillion dollar houses I think about when I think successful high-paying career for upper middle class seem to be out of reach for that income bracket.
- AnimalMuppet 4y ago
  I think your perspective is off. To me, "multimillion dollar houses" are upper class, not upper middle class.
  - corrral 4y ago
    People use "upper middle" to mean different things. Some use it to mean the upper portion of the middle class, by income. Others use it to mean a distinct (and much smaller) class between the middle and upper, with distinct tendencies and preferences, comprising people who live something close to a "rich" lifestyle but are distinguished from the actually-rich by having to work to maintain it, rather than being able to live a very nice life off investment income alone. Doctors, lawyers, other very-well-paid white-collar types, constituting perhaps a single-digit percentage of the population. I'm not sure which, if any, definition has a credible claim to being, in some sense, most-correct.
  - Cookingboy 4y ago
    It depends on context. A household of two earners working for big techs living in a $2M home in Bay Area is definitely comfortable, but by no means upper class. Most of their incomes are still from a W2 form and they still have to budget for kids' school, retirement, etc.
    - refurb 4y ago
      Owning a $2M home in the most expensive area of the US is upper class.
  - deleted 4y ago
    [deleted]
lampshades 4y ago
That’s what I was thinking. I was riding around a few days ago thinking, “what is considered the middle class?” And I definitely would consider this range around it. Maybe I’m just out of touch with the situation but 75k for a household seems like borderline poverty.
- BirAdam 4y ago
  In the “deep South” middle income would start below 75k.
  - lampshades 4y ago
    Funnily enough, I live in the “Deep South”.
    - BirAdam 4y ago
      drive out to a rural area and ask ppl their household income, not a boomer retiree, but a middle aged couple with a few kids. averages: georgia 61980 tennessee 54665 alabama 51734 south carolina 56227 now, people with these incomes would have a house and a car or two. they would shop at regular stores and do more or less okay until quite recently with inflation. to put this in a more real sense, in several of these states, you could until 2019 find large (around 1300 sqft) two bedroom apartments for less than 1k/mo if you left major cities out of your search. if you wanted to buy a home, you could get one at around 2000 sqft for less than 200k.
- lotsofpulp 4y ago
  It depends how you define things. I find it more useful to talk about “security” than “class”. Are you or do you feel secure in your ability to secure shelter? Water? Food? Transportation? Land? Education? Healthcare? Retirement income? Vacation? Disability income? Legal services? Ability to give friends and family money? Permits and political access/favors? I doubt any household with $75k income in the US is securing their retirement, or even healthcare.
  - 4y ago
badcppdev 4y ago
Can you quickly give your definitions for different classes. Salary bands and lifestyles?
- throwaway0a5e 4y ago
  Upper class -> buys land/property/house, (solidly 6+ figure stuff) to signal an image to others in their class Upper middle class -> selects their car or children's education (5, sometimes just brushing 6, figure stuff) to project an image to others in their class Middle class -> selects their clothes and consumer goods (2-3, occasionally 4 figure stuff) to project an image to others in their class Roughly speaking, of course.
- slowmovintarget 4y ago
  For salary bands, Wikipedia does a better job for middle class as opposed to middle income, which the article seems to deliberately conflate. Middle income is near the floor of the income range of the "middle class." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Middle_class#/media/File:Global_Wealth_Distribution_2020_(Property).svg https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Middle_class#/media/File:Globa...
- sosuke 4y ago
  Upper class: makes money with money Upper middle class: has a job and alternate income source, doesn't even consider not taking a family vacation Middle class: has a job, doesn't worry about root canal or car repair, saves money for a family vacation Lower middle class: has a job with healthcare, barely past paycheck to paycheck Below that: has multiple part time jobs or full time hourly position, each check is already spent
  - spaceman_2020 4y ago
    This sounds about right
jibe 4y ago
I agree, it looks low, especially in cities with high housing prices. Looking at income distribution, you'd think a floor for upper middle would be at least 100k for a household. https://www.statista.com/statistics/203183/percentage-distribution-of-household-income-in-the-us/ https://www.statista.com/statistics/203183/percentage-distri...
darkwizard42 4y ago
$127K household income in NYC will qualify you for rent-stabilized apartments... so this seems very off in terms of measurement for larger cities
- dehrmann 4y ago
  Reminds me of Covid stimulus checks that that median Silicon Valley househould didn't qualify for.
everforward 4y ago
I would guess that they're defining "upper middle class" via income quintiles rather than via lifestyle. Those numbers roughly line up with the boundaries for the 4th quintile in 2017, 77k-126k. 2020's fourth quintile was 85k-141k. > I wouldn’t consider that an upper middle class lifestyle. I don't know that the conceptual upper middle class lifestyle actually matches the reality anymore. I think that's true of most quintiles. The upper middle class lives like the middle class used to, the middle class lives like the lower middle class used to, etc. That "upper middle class lifestyle" upshifted and is the domain of the lower rungs of the top quintile now.
- corrral 4y ago
  Definitions for this are all over the place. Fussell's "upper middle class" lifestyle couldn't be stably maintained by households under the top quintile (probably not under the top 10%, even), nor could the upper-middle (also upper, but largely upper-middle) described in the jokey-but-fairly-accurate Official Preppy Handbook, and those books are ~40 years old now. For one thing, both paint decent-or-better private prep school as key for that class, and that's never really been within the reach of the lower four quintiles, to say nothing of the other things you'll need to spend money on to stay in that class.
- danaris 4y ago
  And this is, in fact, the realized effect of the squeezing of the entire middle class over the past decades.
slowmovintarget 4y ago
These are not numbers I'm used to seeing when discussing middle class in the U.S. The middle class in the U.S. has income from $100K to $1M [1]. Middle class is not the same as middle income. The lower threshold for upper middle class is greater than $100K [2]. Are they using adjusted numbers perhaps? Adjusted to what? Ahh... The non-paywalled article uses "middle income" the moment it starts giving numbers, so the title is click-bait. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Middle_class https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Middle_class [2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Upper_middle_class https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Upper_middle_class
robotburrito 4y ago
It is upper middle class if everyone else around you is poorer than that no?
tmaly 4y ago
they forgot to adjust for inflation. I bet 100k today is roughly 50k in the year 2000.
- memling 4y ago
  > I bet 100k today is roughly 50k in the year 2000. Mean inflation from 2000-2021 (last year on record) was ~2.24%, including a 4.7% increase in 2021.[1] $50k inflated at this rate would be approximately $80k. I'm sure others are more qualified to discuss implications, but consider that while inflation erodes nominal purchasing power, it cannot account for effectively deflationary impacts of technology (for an example, see[2]). Of course, we cannot eat technology, at least not exactly; so we probably want to look at metrics related to how easy it is to live. It might be worth looking at cost per calorie, for example, or for commonly-available proxies (e.g., fast food prices). [1] https://www.usinflationcalculator.com/inflation/historical-inflation-rates/ https://www.usinflationcalculator.com/inflation/historical-i... [2] In 1999, hard drives were sized in the hundreds of megabytes and cost more than they do today. See, i.a., https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_hard_disk_drives#2001_to_present https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_hard_disk_drives#20....
  - Foobar8568 4y ago
    Who cares about inflation if your rent/mortgage is 3 or 4 times higher?
    - memling 4y ago
      > Who cares about inflation if your rent/mortgage is 3 or 4 times higher? Oh, for sure: inflation is challenging to measure, and it probably isn't very descriptive for a lot of common situations. (I think the Consumer Price Index is an attempt to help solve this issue. CPI compounded about about 2.1% per year between 2000 and 2021.[1,2] The CPI includes measures of rent, but it also adjusts for seasonal changes.[3]) Inflation and CPI both obscure a lot of ground-level realities for people--the nature of all summary statistics is that they fail to capture the totality of reality in favor of giving us a broad sense for what's going on. Anecdotally my folks moved after their rent increased by 50% when their lease expired. (That was last year.) These are obviously nontrivial increases that have dramatic impacts on people. [1]: https://www.rateinflation.com/consumer-price-index/usa-historical-cpi/ https://www.rateinflation.com/consumer-price-index/usa-histo... [2]: (270.97/172.2)*(1/22.) ≈ 1.021 [3]: https://www.forbes.com/advisor/investing/cpi-consumer-price-index/ https://www.forbes.com/advisor/investing/cpi-consumer-price-...

sonotathrowaway 4y ago

I don’t think it’s really been proven that high inflation hurts the poor more than rich - wealthy people hate inflation as it eats into their returns on capital. They don’t make for sympathetic victims, but fortunately the WSJ has never been averse to changing facts to fit its narrative.

BirAdam 4y ago
This depends upon how much is required to be “rich”. The wealthiest people on Earth tend to use the most debt, and debt likes inflation. You pay off your debt with cheaper dollars. Additionally, it is precisely during periods of recession and/or inflation that we see the disparity between the wealthiest and poorest widen most quickly.
- sonotathrowaway 4y ago
  > Building on the existing literature, we just published a working paper based on a sample of 10 OECD countries since 1970 that isolates the impact of inflation from other factors driving income inequality. > After accounting for the effect of other economic variables, we find a negative correlation between long term inflation and income inequality for low inflation rates. The results suggest that this link turns positive for higher inflation rates (i.e. above a threshold that we estimate at an inflation rate of 13%). These results are in line with other previous studies, which also find a U-shaped relationship between inflation and income inequality (Galli and van der Hoeven, 2001, Bulir, 2001, and Auda, 2010). However, they contradict the strong and widespread belief that inflation hurts the poor more than the rich and thus increases income inequality. https://www.cepweb.org/inflation-and-inequality/ https://www.cepweb.org/inflation-and-inequality/
  - BirAdam 4y ago
    I was using the superlative. “Wealthiest”. This is billionaires, not millionaires. Not merely rich, but the most rich.
jibe 4y ago
How can it not hurt poor people more? Food prices, gas prices, rent increases are things that are critical for survival for poor people. Rich person in a Tesla is not affected. If you are a minimum wage or near minimum wage earner, you have no margin to deal with price increases. We are talking about hurt in the sense of survival, not rich ppl crying about losing their stablecoin.

gopalv 4y ago

> they mention that a member of the upper-middle class, Mr. Yu, purchased a new home, a duplex, and an 8-unit apartment complex during the pandemic. A lot of people who though they were "comfortably rich" in the last couple of years are having a bad wake-up call that their loan interest or income was not as predictably favourable as they imagined. This is probably not the same thing as "being squeezed". That is what is known as a "mistake". It happens and one day it could happen to you, so don't laugh at the people going through it. None of us should be smug about it or do the "don't invest money you don't have" etc. What I take offense to in this article is the passive voice around it where "they get squeezed" instead of "I lost money". The same applies if you took a margin call in the last 6 months after borrowing against $AMZN and buying BTC with it. Does it suck, YES. Worse, you could owe the IRS money for the margin call sale. All of that said, there was a specific video that this guy reminded me of from "How Money Works". https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_INmFnlp-hU https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_INmFnlp-hU It specifically called out "Own a bunch of properties" as a "Buying yourself a new job", rather than being comfortable.

RC_ITR 4y ago
> That is what is known as a "mistake". It happens and one day it could happen to you, so don't laugh at the people going through it. Alternatively, it’s called “risk management” and people with conservative risk management feel the urge to laugh in the bad times because those with liberal risk management are often not afraid to brag about it during the good times.
- drewcoo 4y ago
  Accepting more risk is not "liberal." There's no need to drag US politics into this.
  - egwynn 4y ago
    I didn’t read “conservative” or “liberal” as US political identifiers so much as synonyms for “risk averse” and “risk tolerant” respectively.
  - 4y ago

MattGaiser 4y ago

They start upper middle class here as close to the median household income. https://www.census.gov/library/publications/2021/demo/p60-273.html#:~:text=Median%20household%20income%20was%20%2467%2C521,median%20household%20income%20since%202011 https://www.census.gov/library/publications/2021/demo/p60-27.... It is probably at the median household income now.

Glyptodon 4y ago

I'm not sure about the definition, I suspect colloquial thought about "upper middle class" differs from being in the 60 to 80 range for household income when the 60 is within 10k of median household income. +~$7.5k to median should yield significant benefits long term, like a couple more easily maxing IRAs every year, but shouldn't be a giant leap in class, especially when distribution of wealth places average household income squarely in middle of the 60 - 80 band. That said, the example person they used isn't really paying for insane overextension - especially assuming rates are fixed and pre-rate-hike. He's paying because his living margins and costs are more impacted by inflation than his real-estate costs and now the cost of living margin he expected to be relatively stable is going away.

guyzero 4y ago

"They define upper-middle as a household earning between 75k-127k." I get that the SF Bay Area is its own little universe, but what? You're borderline homeless on that income.

wincy 4y ago
It is its own little universe and not representative of the majority of America. People I know who make silicon valley money by working remote coastal jobs and living here in Kansas all live in the nicest suburbs around, in 3-4,000 square foot McMansions with pools, and lawn care to mow their lush perfectly landscaped yards. These people are making probably 200k with a working spouse. They’re in the same salary bands as local doctors and attorneys. Quality of life based on income is very different in middle America.
- guyzero 4y ago
  But doctors and lawyers are upper-middle aren't they?
  - wincy 4y ago
    Are they? I always thought of doctors and lawyers as the upper class. The people you’re likely to meet in country clubs and on the golf course, or who might run for political office (and actually win).
    - guyzero 4y ago
      They mostly rely on income from their labour, which makes them some strata of middle class. A law firm partner who doesn't do any work could be upper class, but those new law school grads are definitely not upper class.

sosuke 4y ago

I think trying to define class by income isn't possible. It should be defined by quality of life I think. That allows for relative lower middle and upper classes. Being a land owner and employer in a tiny town makes you relative upper class even if you're making 75k a year. While as someone else pointed out 127k a year in NYC qualifies you for rent-stabilized apartments, obviously not upper class.

_8j50 4y ago

Apparently I am upper middle class?? Lol, is this in 2007 dollars? I need to save at least for five years dilligently to afford a house.