camgunz

5 ms·

1.
by camgunz 5d ago
A MacBook Neo is 699 GBP. An 8GB Raspberry Pi w/ 32GB SD card, cable, housing, fan and power supply from Kiwi Electronics is 188 EUR (160 GBP). A monitor, kb/mouse, and SD card from Newegg is 70 USD (45 GBP). Total 205 GBP, which
2.
by camgunz 5d ago
Pis aren't supposed to be for ultra-advanced users, they're even specifically marketed for kids. They're not gonna know if they got a bootlegged version or not.
3.
by camgunz 5d ago
No, RPis are very inexpensive computers. What you're advocating would considerably increase the price of a Raspberry Pi to pay for the additional support burden (if this is even reasonable--should they hire a bunch of people just to an
4.
by camgunz 6d ago
Also good advice for writing software with an LLM.
5.
by camgunz 7d ago
Being able to put a PC together doesn't mean you understand computers. If I ask you to make me a computer that runs a wristwatch, you'll likely be lost unless you have very specialized understanding. I think we actually all know w
6.
by camgunz 11d ago
Swartz was charged under the CFAA, like most hacking cases, and it clearly applies to the Anthropic and OpenAI cases.
7.
by camgunz 12d ago
> The need for Intelligence to fill the scarcity is unthinkable. I just wanna say, I really admire the irony of this sentence. Maybe once we invent superintelligence it will be able to think enough to tell us how badly we needed it befor
8.
by camgunz 12d ago
Of course not. Even the developers of AI admit there's a huge risk though, no? Even they are calling for a slowdown. Do you think you know more than they do?
9.
by camgunz 13d ago
I honestly have no idea what this word salad means.
10.
by camgunz 13d ago
> 50% of the world's population lives in nuke-capable countries. Are you saying you prefer Pakistan getting nukes over India's population doubling since 1975? That seems silly. Also this is only because of China and India, so t
11.
by camgunz 13d ago
I don't know, but it's also what Kevin Rudd thinks [0]. He was Australia's prime minister (twice, lol), Australia's foreign minister, a foreign service officer working in China, and the author of a dissertation on Xi Ji
12.
by camgunz 13d ago
People are working really hard to not see the "until there's a federal commission and safe processes" part.
13.
by camgunz 13d ago
Finally, we agree. Even Dario Amodei thinks we should halt work on intelligence until we can do it safely.
14.
by camgunz 13d ago
"Were we on the brink of a nuclear holocaust multiple times? Maybe yes, maybe no. But hey Google Maps!"
15.
by camgunz 14d ago
Countries use nuclear power too. The reason they don't launch nukes at the drop of a hat is MAD. I don't see how this isn't analogous to what we could do with AI.
16.
by camgunz 14d ago
I don't think working on LLMs is the same as working on superintelligence (personally I don't think superintelligence is on the table, but whatever)
17.
by camgunz 14d ago
The point is an arms race is bad for everyone. "I don't know what WW3 will be fought with, but I do know WW4 will be fought with sticks and stones" type of stuff.
18.
by camgunz 14d ago
No I think it's fine for 9 countries to have existing models and to coordinate development with each other, which is the general outline of all NPTs.
19.
by camgunz 14d ago
The bill doesn't ban it. It pauses it until a regulatory body and processes are established. That seems pretty reasonable.
20.
by camgunz 14d ago
After over 80 years since the US used nuclear weapons against Japan, less than 5% of the world's countries have nuclear weapons, and no one's used one on another country since. If you don't think that's an incredible ach
21.
by camgunz 14d ago
Is it even possible to steal this code? How much of it is uncopyrightable LLM output?
22.
by camgunz 14d ago
Two things I would say. One: nuclear non-proliferation has been pretty successful; we can use a similar model for AI. Two, China's major motivation for developing competitive AI isn't to reap the benefits from an an important new
23.
by camgunz 15d ago
Sing it with me now, "these things aren't inteeeeeeeelligeeeeeeeent"
24.
by camgunz 20d ago
You think we only recently discovered how to tell if someone is obese?
25.
by camgunz 20d ago
You think rates of these things are increasing in children because we live longer?
26.
by camgunz 20d ago
No, because walking around or eating raw food wasn't essential to being human. Thinking is.
27.
by camgunz 20d ago
> humans, on average, are healthier and live longer than ever in human history. Kinda. We also have incredible rates of cardiovascular disease, obesity, and diabetes. While I do mostly buy that the mind and the body are connected, I don&
28.
by camgunz 25d ago
I won't defend the Trump admin, but I will quibble on Anthropic's efforts to be a good actor. It's easy to ask for regulation when you know it won't come (or you'll easily bear the token fines). It's easy to th
29.
by camgunz 26d ago
> No one's making them do it, but just because they stop doesn't mean others will. Pausing just means they give up control. It's like asking the US to unilaterally disarm -- it just guarantees that the less scrupulous grou
30.
by camgunz 26d ago
My thing got a little heat but I didn't see for a couple days, so I thought I'd just let it stand. But it's late and I'm reading through my old comments and, while it's necro, thought I'd do a reply here. I&#x2

More ›