4 ms·
Maybe you need to challenge where your values come from and who they benefit. There is nothing so urgent that people need to work 12 hours a day. There is (for
by skellington 5y ago
Maybe you need to challenge where your values come from and who they benefit. There is nothing so urgent that people need to work 12 hours a day. There is (for most people) nothing that you will value from your time of working hard for a tech company in the future, except perhaps money. If you turn your argument around, people who want a good work-life balance hate people like you because you are willing to die for your corporate master and contribute to the dog-eat-dog mentality that wrecks people. There is something reasonable between 2 hours a day and 12.
- chii 5y agoBut if the output of a company is kept consistent, one worker doing less must imply that somebody else is pulling the weight more. work-life balance should not come at the expense of some of the workers pulling more than their fair share of work.
- k4ch0w 5y agoWhat if the person has more skills to where it takes less time to perform the same task? I.E a junior that is just learning terraform vs. a staff that has used it 3 years?