5 ms·
European studies have already made studies around this[1]. J&J is simply trying to fight the same battle, again, in the US. [1]https://journals.lww.com/eurjcan
by Supermancho 5y ago
European studies have already made studies around this[1]. J&J is simply trying to fight the same battle, again, in the US.
[1]https://journals.lww.com/eurjcancerprev/Abstract/2018/05000/Genital_use_of_talc_and_risk_of_ovarian_cancer__a.8.aspx#:~:text=It%20has%20been%20suggested%20that,et%20al.%2C%201996 https://journals.lww.com/eurjcancerprev/Abstract/2018/05000/...).
- dekhn 5y agoa single metaanalysis that finds a "weak but significant" result isn't sufficient evidence.
- Supermancho 5y agoI'm not providing discovery. I have demonstrated that it's trivial to dig up evidence. Regardless, it's considered common knowledge in other parts of the world and the US is one of the remaining battlegrounds. J&J quickly discontinued the talc-based baby powder (in the US) when the claims started to pile up.