3 ms·
Please share your knowledge, if you don’t expect to have 1000 subscribers surely you wouldn’t expect revenue anyway. Maybe a better approach would be to encoura
by hsbauauvhabzb 5y ago
Please share your knowledge, if you don’t expect to have 1000 subscribers surely you wouldn’t expect revenue anyway. Maybe a better approach would be to encourage ‘buy me a coffee’ donations. Either way, you’re punishing society for google being an asshole.
- Scoundreller 5y agoI don’t expect (and didn’t get) subscribers because I just solve the problem. I’m not entertaining enough for you to continue watching the next video on a thing you probably don’t own. Most likely outcome will be me posting videos on some alternative video platform. Looking at rumble.com (I wish Amazon got into hosting videos like this, being at the place to buy seems the best place if you fail to fix).
- no1lives4ever 5y agoIMO youtube is the primary platform where those looking for videos will search first up. Thing is that if you have a large number of videos, you never know when one of them will get you a large number of views and subscribers. Or maybe in future google will have different goalposts for monetization. Overall, it is always good to have videos on youtube even if you are not monetizing them.
- HWR_14 5y agoGood for who? good for Google. But how is giving free content to Google good for the poster?
- no1lives4ever 5y agoIf in future google changes monetization goalposts, then the poster can potentially make some cash from the older posted videos. And it is entirely possible that one video gets popular and brings in a ton of views and subscribers to the channel.