8 ms·

Instagram took down post with figure from paper showing male advantage in sports

84 points by EvgeniyZh 5y ago

Shadonototra 5y ago
sports revenue isn't magic, it's simple it's sales if females doesn't earn as much as males it's because they don't sell as much as males, it's that simple why would i lose money only because that female sells much less than her male equivalent?
- suyash 5y ago
  but the women sports persons demand the same prize money and sponsorships, you know because "equality".
- gadders 5y ago
  I agree with you to a certain extent, but I think with the right marketing push it is possible to create female sporting superstars - Ronda Rousey is a good example.
- benzible 5y ago
  In the case of US Soccer, the women bring in significantly more revenue than the men but are paid far less. https://www.vox.com/2019/7/10/20686692/us-womens-soccer-team-parade-equal-pay https://www.vox.com/2019/7/10/20686692/us-womens-soccer-team...
  - ativzzz 5y ago
    This is also because the women's team had originally negotiated a contract that prefers stable salaries over the higher risk-reward benefit that comes with winning: https://www.washingtonpost.com/sports/2021/09/22/uswnt-equal-pay-lawsuit-appeal/ https://www.washingtonpost.com/sports/2021/09/22/uswnt-equal...
  - Shadonototra 5y ago
    I wasn't aware of this story, thanks
  - deleted 5y ago
    [deleted]
  - rsj_hn 5y ago
    This is because there are labor markets — men’s soccer as a global labor market makes so much more that players have better options even if a specific team is not doing well. That’s why you don’t do wage comparisons on a team basis but market basis. I’m sure there’s some flagging software company that earns lower revenues than a thriving restaurant, but the devs at that company will still earn more than the waiters at the restaurant. The only way to change that is to make it illegal for workers to look for better employers, and make it illegal for firms to look for cheaper workers. But until that changes, individual employers will pay the prevailing wage, regardless of how much revenue they are getting. This also works in the other direction. Company X makes so much but they only pay their cooks such low wages, etc.
- awb 5y ago
  Advertising and promotion plays a huge role in consumer preferences. It’s not like people are picking any product or service in a vacuum. They’re heavily influenced by culture and what’s “cool”. And what’s “cool” can be influenced by racism, sexism, etc.
monksy 5y ago
Platform bias fueling/supporting tribalism strikes again.
Miner49er 5y ago
In context it seems kind of fair. You can use true facts to support hateful views. I'm not a fan of censorship, but the cat's always been out of the bag when it comes to social media censoring things.
- farmerstan 5y ago
  The argument could be made that letting biological females compete for awards and cash prizes against biological males is misogynistic. But misogyny only exists if gender exists. If gender doesn’t exist then there is no such thing as misogyny or sexual discrimination.
- defen 5y ago
  If one's position is "we have to censor the truth because the truth is immoral" then it's worth considering having an "are we the baddies?" moment.
  - Miner49er 5y ago
    You know it's not just a picture right? There's a description under the picture, that likely was the part that was being censored.
    - defen 5y ago
      Are you talking about the text from the paper itself ("The male performance advantage...") or something else?
  - awb 5y ago
    "The truth" is such a vague term. You can say things that are true, but are also misleading, simply by omitting pertinent information. I think most people's position when they're offended by a "truth snippet" is "this is immoral because it's misleading / incomplete / biased, etc.". In this case, they omitted many sports where men and women are much more level competitors like curling, darts, bowling, equestrian, motor bike racing, marathon swimming, sailing, etc. And ignored marathon swimming where women routinely beat men. And they didn't pick a diverse cross-section of sports that focused on various attributes like upper body strength, lower body strength, accuracy, agility, dexterity, flexibility, endurance, efficiency, artistic movement, decision making, etc. They just published a chart of the more male dominated sports where strength is of outsized importance and said that the male advantage is "insurmountable" as justification for banning transgender athletes (based on testosterone levels) from all female sports. So, people aren't debating what's in the chart, they're debating what's not in the chart.
seibelj 5y ago
No one possibly thinks women and men are physically equal, right? This is why we have separate women and men sports.
- CountDrewku 5y ago
  Oh there is definitely a large group of people pushing this mistaken belief. When you hold the belief that there are no genders then logically there can be no women's sports and you cannot hold the idea that there are physical/mental differences between men or women without some for of cognitive dissonance. The media and many others are backing transgender men entering multiple women's sports like it's not a problem. They're even ok with it happening in MMA and it's terrifying. You're going to have woman killed with this sort of stuff. https://nypost.com/2021/09/11/transgender-fighter-alana-mclaughlin-wins-mma-debut/ https://nypost.com/2021/09/11/transgender-fighter-alana-mcla...
- deleted 5y ago
  [deleted]
- inerte 5y ago
  Maybe a tiny minority do, but it isn't so much about the physicality and genes, but treatment and identification. Someone who's a man or woman in 99% of all contexts (except biology) think Sports, which is a human construct, is discriminatory, and as all human constructs, can be re-invented and changed. Hey, not taking sides here, just saying it's not as simple as reducing to people who think women and men (or female and male) are actually the same. But if it helps taking sides, from our current way of doing most competitive sports, it makes sense to split into male and female (biologically speaking, at birth) and transgenders shouldn't compete on the other side.
  - lovecg 5y ago
    My understanding is that in most sports there’s an “open” division where everyone can compete - though that means in practice men dominate. The “women” division is then created as a way towards better representation. It’s a progressive policy, not discrimination. If we get rid of the women’s division we’ll be left with men-only sports.
treeman79 5y ago
I had an old teacher on Facebook yesterday have a spouse censored because it says “stand up for what you believe in even if you stand alone” Had to click multiple times to see the post as it Facebook gave me multiple warnings on how inappropriate it was to view. This happens all the time to him. He is the Best person I know. The sort you model your life after. But having an opinion criticizing any woke mentality gets him temp banned constantly.
- TigeriusKirk 5y ago
  I saw something like this with an image going around with an innocuous inspirational quote (may have been the same one) that had a content warning on it. Someone said it had some metatags designed to trigger that automated warning filter, but I haven't looked into it to find out if that was what happened.
- deanebarker 5y ago
  I know that post, and I think it fooled a visual algorithm. Look in the background, and the people in front of the light poles look like they're hanging from gallows.
  - deanebarker 5y ago
    Someone else did some testing, and they seem to have found the problem, which was indeed a visual issue that an algorithm misinterpreted. https://www.truthorfiction.com/stand-up-for-what-you-believe-in-even-if-facebook-marks-it-sensitive-content/ https://www.truthorfiction.com/stand-up-for-what-you-believe...
flatiron 5y ago
Double edged sword here. This is obviously scientific. We have womens and mens sports separate because of these distinctions. But I can see how they can bundle it with the famous 4chan “X% of crime is committed by Y race” which takes 0 account of the actual factors that contribute to that stat as they focus incorrectly on race.
- k__ 5y ago
  Yes, correlation and causation aren't always straight forward and often the former is used as the latter just to discredit a group of people "in the name of science".
  - gotoeleven 5y ago
    There's no way we're going to solve these problems if facts are suppressed because people might draw the "wrong" conclusions from them. Racial crime rates are directly pertinent to, for example, assessing BLM claims that black people are being targeted by police. Many people (incorrectly) believe this is true because the relevant facts are suppressed.
- vibrato2 5y ago
  It’s about 50% of violent crime by about 2% of the population by the way. Young black males
- deleted 5y ago
  [deleted]
- awb 5y ago
  Men’s and women’s sports are segregated in part because men have large amounts of testosterone which is like a naturally occurring performance enhancing drug. So, of course men will outperform women in most sports, even if all other factors like access and funding were equal. But the chart leaves out sports where women can beat men or are very comparable like some gymnastics, ultra-long distance swimming & running, sailing, bowling, equine sports, shooting, rock climbing, racing etc. Basically, sports that minimize the importance of muscle mass and maximize the importance of muscle efficiency and endurance tend to be much more competitive, but that’s missing from this chart which shows men being superior across the board.
carabiner 5y ago
I saw someone's picture of chantrelle mushrooms (read: food, not drugs) laying on a table get flagged. Some racy bikini pics will get taken down, depending on how many haters an influencer has (this is why they make backup accounts). The moderation increasingly responds to enforce the views of the most puritanical or offended users. IG gets a billion items flagged per day. I'm sure there's way worse examples of unjust moderation than this chart. It's not politically motivated, just mindless.
- gorwell 5y ago
  On twitter I'm constantly clicking on "Show additional replies, including those that may contain offensive content" and "view sensitive material" warnings, and 99% of the time it's entirely mundane. It feels just like a moral panic with a group of authoritarian puritans at the helm of `Trust & Safety`.
  - monksy 5y ago
    I think we've gotten better at describing moral panic as tribal fighting these days. (Moral panic infers that it's a shared sense of mortality) There should be better technology out there to allow for different group standards without having to conflict with each other. (Also while allowing for communication and visiblity for ideas) I know that's a hard problem.. but it goes beyond just engagement.
  - wheybags 5y ago
    I use showdead on hn, and I'd say it's kinda 50-50. A comment thread like this one is gonna draw out the worst offenders though.
  - EvgeniyZh 5y ago
    On Twitter you can set you account as "offensive" and then all your content will be marked as one
  - hagbard_c 5y ago
    The Twitter algorithm seems to be finely tuned to promote comments which fit the desired ideological narrative while demoting anything which goes against it. This often leads to strange situations where some mundane "conservative" post is followed by a page full of critical "progressive" posts, each of which has only a few "likes". After wading though a page or 2 of such finally posts which are more in agreement with the original comment show up. Those comments tend to have far higher "like" counts which seems to indicate people, well, like those comments better than they do the "progressive" ones. In itself there is something to be said for confronting people with different opinions and as such the algorithm could serve a function if it showed this behaviour across the political spectrum. This, however, is not the case - "progressive" posts are followed first by pages and pages of "progressive" comments in support of the post. Only after wading through those posts do the first critical comments appear. This behaviour is not entirely consistent but it does occur more often than not, especially in situations where there is a sufficient number of "progressive" comments to fill the first page or 2. In short, Twitter is heavily biased towards "progressive" comments/commenters - I assume the algorithm looks both at the content of the comment as well as at the commenters comment history to decide whether to promote or demote specific comments. As such is is not a usable platform for open discussion, not even for those who support those "progressive" causes - unless they consider an echo chamber a suitable location for such discussions. This leaves aside the fact that the message format used on Twitter makes it nigh impossible to express nuance, the whole thing is made for online shouting matches.
gorwell 5y ago
That's the problem with `hate speech`. It can be defined as anything you don't like, including science.
bluecalm 5y ago
It's funny because if men didn't have clear advantage in sports (and competition in general as the advantage is there in less physical activities like mind sports/games as well) then it would be hard to justify existence of women only competitions. One of the conundrums of woke culture - no matter how you try to flex it your ideology doesn't fit the reality. Btw, that anyone needs to see studies to be convinced men has significant advantage in sports over women is already a sad sign of common sense often being lost nowadays.
- silicon2401 5y ago
  > One of the conundrums of woke culture - no matter how you try to flex it your ideology doesn't fit the reality. The danger and horror of ideologies that embrace contradictions is that they can justify whatever they want, at any time, without worrying about self-contradictions or consistency. It's up to everyone else to look past the superficial points and figure out what their real goals are
- awb 5y ago
  > Btw, that anyone needs to see studies to be convinced men has significant advantage in sports over women is already a sad sign of common sense often being lost nowadays. I for one appreciate data, even if it's obvious to others that are more familiar with the sport. It's interesting to me to see exactly the % difference rather than just intuitively noticing that there is a difference. Also, women do dominate some sports. For example, woman dominate ultra-long distance open water swimming (marathon swimming): https://www.swimmingworldmagazine.com/news/marathon-swimming-where-women-have-outperformed-the-men/ https://www.swimmingworldmagazine.com/news/marathon-swimming... > women hold 14 of the longest 23 current neutral endurance records https://www.swimmingworldmagazine.com/news/why-women-have-beaten-men-in-marathon-swimming/ https://www.swimmingworldmagazine.com/news/why-women-have-be... > the best women per year were 12-14% faster than the best men Just focusing on the narrow selection of swimming on TV I would have assumed that men are always faster than women at swimming, which isn't the case. Common sense will get you pretty far, but it shouldn't be the final verdict.
  - bluecalm 5y ago
throwawaysea 5y ago
This happens much more regularly than most people know. Everyday I see moderates and conservatives sharing screenshots of very reasonable posts that resulted in past account suspensions or bans, or post-specific censorship, content flags ("missing context"), etc. In most cases they are given no reason other than a vague claim of violating 'community standards'. The net effect is that one side of many controversial topics has little representation and exposure. When foreign powers distort societal discourse, we call it "propaganda". We need to start using that same label when tech companies do this. Part of this is enabled by the hyperbolic language used to justify censorship. "Hate speech" is really just code for "speech that disagrees with the progressive left". The reason these policies are written they way they are and enforced the way they are, is because these companies have employees and leaders that are biased, who brought their own political biases into the workplace. If a company is mission-oriented and tries to represent the interests of all customers, they would take a different approach that is more balanced. But at this point I don't think a small clique of urban West Coast companies can be trusted with the kind of power they have. The solution is to regulate social media as a common carrier, because it is a basic essential service in the modern world: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_media_as_a_public_utility https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_media_as_a_public_utili...
- seoulmetro 5y ago
  This is a great post that identifies a large problem. I wish it could be solved one day. Being a moderate right now is like being stuck between a rock and a hard place.

84 points by EvgeniyZh 5y ago

sports revenue isn't magic, it's simple it's sales if females doesn't earn as much as males it's because they don't sell as much as males, it's that simple why would i lose money only because that female sells much less than her male equivalent?

suyash 5y ago
but the women sports persons demand the same prize money and sponsorships, you know because "equality".
gadders 5y ago
I agree with you to a certain extent, but I think with the right marketing push it is possible to create female sporting superstars - Ronda Rousey is a good example.
benzible 5y ago
In the case of US Soccer, the women bring in significantly more revenue than the men but are paid far less. https://www.vox.com/2019/7/10/20686692/us-womens-soccer-team-parade-equal-pay https://www.vox.com/2019/7/10/20686692/us-womens-soccer-team...
- ativzzz 5y ago
  This is also because the women's team had originally negotiated a contract that prefers stable salaries over the higher risk-reward benefit that comes with winning: https://www.washingtonpost.com/sports/2021/09/22/uswnt-equal-pay-lawsuit-appeal/ https://www.washingtonpost.com/sports/2021/09/22/uswnt-equal...
- Shadonototra 5y ago
  I wasn't aware of this story, thanks
- deleted 5y ago
  [deleted]
- rsj_hn 5y ago
  This is because there are labor markets — men’s soccer as a global labor market makes so much more that players have better options even if a specific team is not doing well. That’s why you don’t do wage comparisons on a team basis but market basis. I’m sure there’s some flagging software company that earns lower revenues than a thriving restaurant, but the devs at that company will still earn more than the waiters at the restaurant. The only way to change that is to make it illegal for workers to look for better employers, and make it illegal for firms to look for cheaper workers. But until that changes, individual employers will pay the prevailing wage, regardless of how much revenue they are getting. This also works in the other direction. Company X makes so much but they only pay their cooks such low wages, etc.
awb 5y ago
Advertising and promotion plays a huge role in consumer preferences. It’s not like people are picking any product or service in a vacuum. They’re heavily influenced by culture and what’s “cool”. And what’s “cool” can be influenced by racism, sexism, etc.

monksy 5y ago

Platform bias fueling/supporting tribalism strikes again.

Miner49er 5y ago

In context it seems kind of fair. You can use true facts to support hateful views. I'm not a fan of censorship, but the cat's always been out of the bag when it comes to social media censoring things.

farmerstan 5y ago
The argument could be made that letting biological females compete for awards and cash prizes against biological males is misogynistic. But misogyny only exists if gender exists. If gender doesn’t exist then there is no such thing as misogyny or sexual discrimination.
defen 5y ago
If one's position is "we have to censor the truth because the truth is immoral" then it's worth considering having an "are we the baddies?" moment.
- Miner49er 5y ago
  You know it's not just a picture right? There's a description under the picture, that likely was the part that was being censored.
  - defen 5y ago
    Are you talking about the text from the paper itself ("The male performance advantage...") or something else?
- awb 5y ago
  "The truth" is such a vague term. You can say things that are true, but are also misleading, simply by omitting pertinent information. I think most people's position when they're offended by a "truth snippet" is "this is immoral because it's misleading / incomplete / biased, etc.". In this case, they omitted many sports where men and women are much more level competitors like curling, darts, bowling, equestrian, motor bike racing, marathon swimming, sailing, etc. And ignored marathon swimming where women routinely beat men. And they didn't pick a diverse cross-section of sports that focused on various attributes like upper body strength, lower body strength, accuracy, agility, dexterity, flexibility, endurance, efficiency, artistic movement, decision making, etc. They just published a chart of the more male dominated sports where strength is of outsized importance and said that the male advantage is "insurmountable" as justification for banning transgender athletes (based on testosterone levels) from all female sports. So, people aren't debating what's in the chart, they're debating what's not in the chart.

seibelj 5y ago

No one possibly thinks women and men are physically equal, right? This is why we have separate women and men sports.

CountDrewku 5y ago
Oh there is definitely a large group of people pushing this mistaken belief. When you hold the belief that there are no genders then logically there can be no women's sports and you cannot hold the idea that there are physical/mental differences between men or women without some for of cognitive dissonance. The media and many others are backing transgender men entering multiple women's sports like it's not a problem. They're even ok with it happening in MMA and it's terrifying. You're going to have woman killed with this sort of stuff. https://nypost.com/2021/09/11/transgender-fighter-alana-mclaughlin-wins-mma-debut/ https://nypost.com/2021/09/11/transgender-fighter-alana-mcla...
deleted 5y ago
[deleted]
inerte 5y ago
Maybe a tiny minority do, but it isn't so much about the physicality and genes, but treatment and identification. Someone who's a man or woman in 99% of all contexts (except biology) think Sports, which is a human construct, is discriminatory, and as all human constructs, can be re-invented and changed. Hey, not taking sides here, just saying it's not as simple as reducing to people who think women and men (or female and male) are actually the same. But if it helps taking sides, from our current way of doing most competitive sports, it makes sense to split into male and female (biologically speaking, at birth) and transgenders shouldn't compete on the other side.
- lovecg 5y ago
  My understanding is that in most sports there’s an “open” division where everyone can compete - though that means in practice men dominate. The “women” division is then created as a way towards better representation. It’s a progressive policy, not discrimination. If we get rid of the women’s division we’ll be left with men-only sports.

treeman79 5y ago

I had an old teacher on Facebook yesterday have a spouse censored because it says “stand up for what you believe in even if you stand alone” Had to click multiple times to see the post as it Facebook gave me multiple warnings on how inappropriate it was to view. This happens all the time to him. He is the Best person I know. The sort you model your life after. But having an opinion criticizing any woke mentality gets him temp banned constantly.

TigeriusKirk 5y ago
I saw something like this with an image going around with an innocuous inspirational quote (may have been the same one) that had a content warning on it. Someone said it had some metatags designed to trigger that automated warning filter, but I haven't looked into it to find out if that was what happened.
deanebarker 5y ago
I know that post, and I think it fooled a visual algorithm. Look in the background, and the people in front of the light poles look like they're hanging from gallows.
- deanebarker 5y ago
  Someone else did some testing, and they seem to have found the problem, which was indeed a visual issue that an algorithm misinterpreted. https://www.truthorfiction.com/stand-up-for-what-you-believe-in-even-if-facebook-marks-it-sensitive-content/ https://www.truthorfiction.com/stand-up-for-what-you-believe...

flatiron 5y ago

Double edged sword here. This is obviously scientific. We have womens and mens sports separate because of these distinctions. But I can see how they can bundle it with the famous 4chan “X% of crime is committed by Y race” which takes 0 account of the actual factors that contribute to that stat as they focus incorrectly on race.

k__ 5y ago
Yes, correlation and causation aren't always straight forward and often the former is used as the latter just to discredit a group of people "in the name of science".
- gotoeleven 5y ago
  There's no way we're going to solve these problems if facts are suppressed because people might draw the "wrong" conclusions from them. Racial crime rates are directly pertinent to, for example, assessing BLM claims that black people are being targeted by police. Many people (incorrectly) believe this is true because the relevant facts are suppressed.
vibrato2 5y ago
It’s about 50% of violent crime by about 2% of the population by the way. Young black males
deleted 5y ago
[deleted]
awb 5y ago
Men’s and women’s sports are segregated in part because men have large amounts of testosterone which is like a naturally occurring performance enhancing drug. So, of course men will outperform women in most sports, even if all other factors like access and funding were equal. But the chart leaves out sports where women can beat men or are very comparable like some gymnastics, ultra-long distance swimming & running, sailing, bowling, equine sports, shooting, rock climbing, racing etc. Basically, sports that minimize the importance of muscle mass and maximize the importance of muscle efficiency and endurance tend to be much more competitive, but that’s missing from this chart which shows men being superior across the board.

carabiner 5y ago

I saw someone's picture of chantrelle mushrooms (read: food, not drugs) laying on a table get flagged. Some racy bikini pics will get taken down, depending on how many haters an influencer has (this is why they make backup accounts). The moderation increasingly responds to enforce the views of the most puritanical or offended users. IG gets a billion items flagged per day. I'm sure there's way worse examples of unjust moderation than this chart. It's not politically motivated, just mindless.

gorwell 5y ago
On twitter I'm constantly clicking on "Show additional replies, including those that may contain offensive content" and "view sensitive material" warnings, and 99% of the time it's entirely mundane. It feels just like a moral panic with a group of authoritarian puritans at the helm of `Trust & Safety`.
- monksy 5y ago
  I think we've gotten better at describing moral panic as tribal fighting these days. (Moral panic infers that it's a shared sense of mortality) There should be better technology out there to allow for different group standards without having to conflict with each other. (Also while allowing for communication and visiblity for ideas) I know that's a hard problem.. but it goes beyond just engagement.
- wheybags 5y ago
  I use showdead on hn, and I'd say it's kinda 50-50. A comment thread like this one is gonna draw out the worst offenders though.
- EvgeniyZh 5y ago
  On Twitter you can set you account as "offensive" and then all your content will be marked as one
- hagbard_c 5y ago
  The Twitter algorithm seems to be finely tuned to promote comments which fit the desired ideological narrative while demoting anything which goes against it. This often leads to strange situations where some mundane "conservative" post is followed by a page full of critical "progressive" posts, each of which has only a few "likes". After wading though a page or 2 of such finally posts which are more in agreement with the original comment show up. Those comments tend to have far higher "like" counts which seems to indicate people, well, like those comments better than they do the "progressive" ones. In itself there is something to be said for confronting people with different opinions and as such the algorithm could serve a function if it showed this behaviour across the political spectrum. This, however, is not the case - "progressive" posts are followed first by pages and pages of "progressive" comments in support of the post. Only after wading through those posts do the first critical comments appear. This behaviour is not entirely consistent but it does occur more often than not, especially in situations where there is a sufficient number of "progressive" comments to fill the first page or 2. In short, Twitter is heavily biased towards "progressive" comments/commenters - I assume the algorithm looks both at the content of the comment as well as at the commenters comment history to decide whether to promote or demote specific comments. As such is is not a usable platform for open discussion, not even for those who support those "progressive" causes - unless they consider an echo chamber a suitable location for such discussions. This leaves aside the fact that the message format used on Twitter makes it nigh impossible to express nuance, the whole thing is made for online shouting matches.

gorwell 5y ago

That's the problem with `hate speech`. It can be defined as anything you don't like, including science.

bluecalm 5y ago

It's funny because if men didn't have clear advantage in sports (and competition in general as the advantage is there in less physical activities like mind sports/games as well) then it would be hard to justify existence of women only competitions. One of the conundrums of woke culture - no matter how you try to flex it your ideology doesn't fit the reality. Btw, that anyone needs to see studies to be convinced men has significant advantage in sports over women is already a sad sign of common sense often being lost nowadays.

silicon2401 5y ago
> One of the conundrums of woke culture - no matter how you try to flex it your ideology doesn't fit the reality. The danger and horror of ideologies that embrace contradictions is that they can justify whatever they want, at any time, without worrying about self-contradictions or consistency. It's up to everyone else to look past the superficial points and figure out what their real goals are
awb 5y ago
> Btw, that anyone needs to see studies to be convinced men has significant advantage in sports over women is already a sad sign of common sense often being lost nowadays. I for one appreciate data, even if it's obvious to others that are more familiar with the sport. It's interesting to me to see exactly the % difference rather than just intuitively noticing that there is a difference. Also, women do dominate some sports. For example, woman dominate ultra-long distance open water swimming (marathon swimming): https://www.swimmingworldmagazine.com/news/marathon-swimming-where-women-have-outperformed-the-men/ https://www.swimmingworldmagazine.com/news/marathon-swimming... > women hold 14 of the longest 23 current neutral endurance records https://www.swimmingworldmagazine.com/news/why-women-have-beaten-men-in-marathon-swimming/ https://www.swimmingworldmagazine.com/news/why-women-have-be... > the best women per year were 12-14% faster than the best men Just focusing on the narrow selection of swimming on TV I would have assumed that men are always faster than women at swimming, which isn't the case. Common sense will get you pretty far, but it shouldn't be the final verdict.
- bluecalm 5y ago

throwawaysea 5y ago

This happens much more regularly than most people know. Everyday I see moderates and conservatives sharing screenshots of very reasonable posts that resulted in past account suspensions or bans, or post-specific censorship, content flags ("missing context"), etc. In most cases they are given no reason other than a vague claim of violating 'community standards'. The net effect is that one side of many controversial topics has little representation and exposure. When foreign powers distort societal discourse, we call it "propaganda". We need to start using that same label when tech companies do this. Part of this is enabled by the hyperbolic language used to justify censorship. "Hate speech" is really just code for "speech that disagrees with the progressive left". The reason these policies are written they way they are and enforced the way they are, is because these companies have employees and leaders that are biased, who brought their own political biases into the workplace. If a company is mission-oriented and tries to represent the interests of all customers, they would take a different approach that is more balanced. But at this point I don't think a small clique of urban West Coast companies can be trusted with the kind of power they have. The solution is to regulate social media as a common carrier, because it is a basic essential service in the modern world: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_media_as_a_public_utility https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_media_as_a_public_utili...

seoulmetro 5y ago
This is a great post that identifies a large problem. I wish it could be solved one day. Being a moderate right now is like being stuck between a rock and a hard place.