5 ms·

How is deliverability on a self-hosted solution like this? The only thing that keeps me from self hosting is I'm worried about running into spam filter issues w

by brink 5y ago

How is deliverability on a self-hosted solution like this? The only thing that keeps me from self hosting is I'm worried about running into spam filter issues when trying to deliver email from an unknown source.

oskapt 5y ago
I’ve run my own mail server for decades, and if you set up SPF and DMARC correctly, you won’t have any real issues. The biggest problem I had over the years was with outlook.com blacklisting all of AWS as spam IP space, but once I contacted them and explained what I was doing, they investigated and whitelisted my elastic IP address.
- codetrotter 5y ago
  What software do you use for your mail server and client? I’m looking to replace my current self-hosted setup with something else. Currently I am running Postfix on my FreeBSD server, and not using SpamAssasin. I've had this setup for years and it's less than ideal but it's at the point where it's been hard to justify the time I'd have to spend setting up a better configuration. I ssh into the server and read mail using mutt. I also have notmuch installed but only use it a little bit now and then and still relying primarily on mutt. I'm not really happy about mutt either. It's neat in its own way but it's also a bit of a drag to use and even though I enjoy using the command line I don't feel like mutt is really a good fit for how I would like to use mail. Ideally I think I'd want something similar to how some of the features of GMail work, but mainly in terms of tagging and filtering. As for a web based interface, I don't want that part really. But still very much interested in knowing of web interfaces too from people that use them and like them. But most of all, what I am looking for is a server that has good and easy to use filtering, that is open source and runs on FreeBSD or Linux, and native clients for macOS and iOS that integrate well with the server including the tagging and filtering stuff.
  - na85 5y ago
    I have a dovecot+postfix+rspamd setup and I read my mail with apple mail.app, thunderbird, and FairEmail on my phone. That latter app is excellent and I highly recommend.
- RcouF1uZ4gsC 5y ago
  > I’ve run my own mail server for decades, and if you set up SPF and DMARC correctly, you won’t have any real issues. I wonder if the fact that you have done it for decades helps with you avoiding spam filters. This may not be the experience for someone who newly sets up their own email server.
  - indymike 5y ago
    > This may not be the experience for someone who newly sets up their own email server. I've set up mail servers many times over many decades and it's not as hard as a lot of people think. For a reasonably secured and maintained personal server, you'll have to learn about SPF, DMARC, and do more detailed DNS setup than you do to get a quick website up, but once up, everything should go well... so long as you and your family behave. For businesses, especially those with enthusiastic marketing teams, it's harder because all it takes is a a bug in some transactional email code, or a bad email from a well meaning sales rep to some email list from a "digital marketing" forum to completely wreck your server's reputation.
    - na85 5y ago
      >For businesses, especially those with enthusiastic marketing teams, it's harder because all it takes is a a bug in some transactional email code, or a bad email from a well meaning sales rep to some email list from a "digital marketing" forum to completely wreck your server's reputation. Working as intended if you ask me.
  - vbezhenar 5y ago
    I think that IP address reputation is the biggest factor in mail deliverability for small servers. So when you've bought new VPS, it will be hit or miss, whether your IPv4 address was used maliciously before or not.
- pbhjpbhj 5y ago
  This comes up quite regularly, some of us have had major deliverability problems with SPF and DMARC and DKIM all set up. There are, it appears, other factors outside of one's control -- for me it was (at the time) MS apparently wouldn't receive my email (that was whitelisted, and from a 15yo domain with < one email per week outbound to Live.com) because a ip4 address of a server (not the one I was using) currently hosted by my hosting provider had previously been used for spam. There was no efficient way for me to move hosting provider and know that the same situation wouldn't be true, so I signed up for a new @live.com address and send emails to MS domains through that from my MUA (Thunderbird). At that time MS had a third party that managed this, you could pay them to do something that would basically get you whitelisted; but this was for an SME and the cost was prohibitive for the potential benefit. If you moved server on AWS presumably you'd have to go the same route again - who did you contact? - would you be 100% confident you'd get whitelisted?
- ancarda 5y ago
  How did you know to contact Microsoft to have them whitelist your IP? Was that from a DMARC report? This is the sort of thing that puts me off self-hosting email, as much as I'd like to do it -- it seems like a huge amount of effort, tracking down who I need to shout at this week to have them whitelist my IP address.
  - heipei 5y ago
    Microsoft doesn’t send DMARC reports which made discovering delivery issues all the more problematic.
- cube00 5y ago
  If you get caught by this you can request "delivery mitigation" (i.e. removal from their IP blacklist) here: http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkID=614866 http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkID=614866 You can also join the "Smart Network Data Service" (SNDS) program, which can alert you in the future if you are re-listed and sometimes will provide additional information about why the IP has been listed. https://postmaster.live.com/snds/addnetwork.aspx https://postmaster.live.com/snds/addnetwork.aspx
  - baobabKoodaa 5y ago
    > If you get caught by this you can request "delivery mitigation" (i.e. removal from their IP blacklist) here: http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkID=614866 http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkID=614866 Microsoft only provides delivery mitigation for large-volume senders. Small-volume senders (i.e. not spam senders) will not be provided delivery mitigation. That's from my personal experience anyway. > You can also join the "Smart Network Data Service" (SNDS) program, which can alert you in the future if you are re-listed and sometimes will provide additional information about why the IP has been listed. Unless you are a large-volume sender, you will not be able to get ANY information out of SNDS.
- eikenberry 5y ago
  Depends who you are trying to send email to. There are email providers that use IP blacklist maintainers that require you to pay a fee to keep off their blacklist if you are not a big provider (eg. they blacklist all VPS hosting companies). This was the final straw that had me switch to using a provider for SMTP (not MX, I run it still).
mgbmtl 5y ago
I run my own small-company mail server with 10 high-use accounts (using Zimbra, but it's mostly dead, so looking for alternatives). We lease small /29 blocks from OVH for our various services. Haven't had many issues in the past 5 years, except once when a user was hacked and spam was sent. 48h later things were back to normal.
- nix23 5y ago
  SOGo instead of Zimbra?
radiac 5y ago
I self hosted for myself and some clients for years. As long as you set up everything correctly it's fairly pain-free, but it's definitely worth getting on as many abuse notification lists as you can find - I wasn't doing anything remotely spam-related but still got blacklisted by hotmail twice and some other places a couple of times; as I remember it getting cleared was just a case of jumping through a few hoops, but I still needed to find out about the problem before my clients did, and find the hoops to jump through (which was never easy). I found the main issue was maintenance. Once it was set up it didn't need too much poking, but I was still responsible for my own downtime and backup, and every few years I'd need to move it to a new server. I ran a secondary relay so at least migrating without downtime was relatively easy, but it was still a multi-day process while I moved configurations, rules and mail across, waited to trust DNS propagation etc. And in the back of my mind if someone didn't reply in a timely manner, I couldn't ever stop wondering if I'd missed a blacklist somewhere, or if a provider had just decided to spambin everything from my IP. The other pain point was that as it was a necessary service rather than something that generated profit, I didn't want to put any serious time into improving things for myself. That meant I was using IMAP+Thunderbird with whatever shonky open source webmail-du-jour I'd set up on the server that year, combined with various shell scripts and notes in wikis about how to manage users, forwarding rules etc. It worked, but it was never easy, and was never slick. After I took a job where we all used gmail, I got used to things being easy and slick, and decided to stop self-hosting and move my mail to dedicated mail providers (fastmail and sendgrid in my case, ymmv). Haven't looked back. Self hosting you mail is something I'd recommend doing once for fun to see how it all works, but unless you have a clear and definite reason to go it alone, it's definitely worth paying someone else to do it for you.
- baobabKoodaa 5y ago
  > As long as you set up everything correctly it's fairly pain-free This is not true. Maybe you got it working for you (or maybe you never really measured your deliverability), but as a general advice that's just wrong. I've run my own email server for years and I've found it extremely difficult to get deliverability to Outlook and Gmail. You won't even get access to their deliverability debugging tools unless you send large volumes of email. Perversely, a small-volume sender is more likely to be classified as spam than a large-volume sender.
foolinaround 5y ago
this is indeed a big roadblock to self-hosting. There needs to be a seperate service provider that offers this expertise possibly for a fee.
- cube00 5y ago
  It's not so much expertise you need, you need the mail services to "trust" your address with reputation. If other providers take the hard line that Microsoft are taking now (550 refusals by default for unknown IPs) then using mail rely services like MailGun may be the only alternative for self hosting that only sends a few emails a year.
kappuchino 5y ago
I have switched from zimbra (community) to MailInABox (https://mailinabox.email https://mailinabox.email) and can say that a cheap five euros per month ssd-shared-4-virtual-cpu can manage as much as 1000nds of mails per day in and out for dozens of users with ease. So far I had not issues with spam classification, also due using a .de and .net email domain. (See stories about the infamous .xyz domains for reference) I tried Modoboa as well, but got stuck with the (lets encrypt) cerificate renewal process at that time - might be I did something wrong, don't know. Now everything runs automatic and smooth.
abdullahkhalids 5y ago
I am part of a small non-profit online workshop organization. We have a small hetzner server to host our email server. I don't think we ever had any trouble with email delivery in the year we have run it. I also set my personal email server (mailinabox on the cheapest hetzner server) last month. All my emails were accepted. Only some exchange emails to my friends were initially sent to spam, but after asking them to mark the emails as not spam, and them replying to me a few times, I have not had further delivery issues. I did have some weird kurfufle with dns last week, where my domain would not resolve. There was some notice on the namecheap website about some dns outage, but it has disappeared since then and I was too busy to explore then. I just spent yesterday resetting everything in namecheap configuration after which everything started working again.
deleted 5y ago
[deleted]
na85 5y ago
I don't run TFmailserver but I self-host a postfix+dovecot setup and deliverability has been good so far. I'm willing to try shooting you an email and we'll see if it arrives.
greggh 5y ago
I've run my own for about 4 years now with mail-in-a-box. It's on digital ocean, and it delivers fine to everyone. Like others have said, you just have to watch the lists to see if you end up in a block of IPs that gets blacklisted. It has only happened to me once, and like everyone else, it was outlook.com / live. It only took a couple days to get fixed. With mail-in-a-box you also get Nextcloud for the users, and have a nice google drive replacement with the Nextcloud client.
- baobabKoodaa 5y ago
  > I've run my own for about 4 years now with mail-in-a-box. It's on digital ocean, and it delivers fine to everyone. Like others have said, you just have to watch the lists to see if you end up in a block of IPs that gets blacklisted This is not true. I've also run my own server for several yes (on AWS), I've never seen the IP on any blacklists, and yet my deliverability to Outlook and Gmail is extremely bad (I've since moved on to using Postmark for sending emails).
raegis 5y ago
I'm been running a mail server on my personal domain for 20 years. The hosting provider is key. One well-known hosting provider I used to use had lots of IPs on the e-mail blacklists. I found a slightly less well-known provider without this problem. I test sending and receiving to Gmail accounts and Microsoft 365(?) accounts, and they all seem to work fine if I just configure reverse DNS, ipv6, and TLS (certificates from Let's Encrypt) correctly. I use Postfix. When I e-mail bomb (40 emails or so) from a Moodle server, sometimes emails show up in spam folders on Microsoft servers, but that's the worst of it.
wvh 5y ago
I've hosted my own email server for years; I coincidentally shut it down yesterday. Once you've got it set up properly, deliverability is quite good. The main problem is having to monitor blacklists, spam and account brute-force attacks, and typical issues with infrastructure such as disk space or DNS. Rarely anything goes wrong, but when it does, it will be at the most inconvenient time and you'll have no option but to fix it if you want to keep receiving email. Out of principle, I believe any individual should be able to self-host, but at the same time, I don't have the time and interest anymore to babysit servers for personal use. So you probably want to weigh those two things according to your own situation. The main issue these days is finding providers that allow running open mail servers and yet are not blackholed because of IP range sender reputation. A lot of the cheaper server providers have to fight relatively lot of abuse so you're stuck between a rock and a hard place having to convince both your own provider as well as the mail servers you send to of your good intentions. There should probably be a provider aimed specifically at email servers that takes extra care it has IP ranges that never host spammers, cryptocurrency, tor nodes, botnets and whatnot.
baobabKoodaa 5y ago
> How is deliverability on a self-hosted solution like this? It's extremely difficult to deliver email to Outlook and Gmail Inboxes from a self-hosted solution on a cloud (or residential) IP address. I wrote more about my experience here: https://www.attejuvonen.fi/dont-send-email-from-your-own-server/ https://www.attejuvonen.fi/dont-send-email-from-your-own-ser...

by brink 5y ago

oskapt 5y ago

I’ve run my own mail server for decades, and if you set up SPF and DMARC correctly, you won’t have any real issues. The biggest problem I had over the years was with outlook.com blacklisting all of AWS as spam IP space, but once I contacted them and explained what I was doing, they investigated and whitelisted my elastic IP address.

codetrotter 5y ago
What software do you use for your mail server and client? I’m looking to replace my current self-hosted setup with something else. Currently I am running Postfix on my FreeBSD server, and not using SpamAssasin. I've had this setup for years and it's less than ideal but it's at the point where it's been hard to justify the time I'd have to spend setting up a better configuration. I ssh into the server and read mail using mutt. I also have notmuch installed but only use it a little bit now and then and still relying primarily on mutt. I'm not really happy about mutt either. It's neat in its own way but it's also a bit of a drag to use and even though I enjoy using the command line I don't feel like mutt is really a good fit for how I would like to use mail. Ideally I think I'd want something similar to how some of the features of GMail work, but mainly in terms of tagging and filtering. As for a web based interface, I don't want that part really. But still very much interested in knowing of web interfaces too from people that use them and like them. But most of all, what I am looking for is a server that has good and easy to use filtering, that is open source and runs on FreeBSD or Linux, and native clients for macOS and iOS that integrate well with the server including the tagging and filtering stuff.
- na85 5y ago
  I have a dovecot+postfix+rspamd setup and I read my mail with apple mail.app, thunderbird, and FairEmail on my phone. That latter app is excellent and I highly recommend.
RcouF1uZ4gsC 5y ago
> I’ve run my own mail server for decades, and if you set up SPF and DMARC correctly, you won’t have any real issues. I wonder if the fact that you have done it for decades helps with you avoiding spam filters. This may not be the experience for someone who newly sets up their own email server.
- indymike 5y ago
  > This may not be the experience for someone who newly sets up their own email server. I've set up mail servers many times over many decades and it's not as hard as a lot of people think. For a reasonably secured and maintained personal server, you'll have to learn about SPF, DMARC, and do more detailed DNS setup than you do to get a quick website up, but once up, everything should go well... so long as you and your family behave. For businesses, especially those with enthusiastic marketing teams, it's harder because all it takes is a a bug in some transactional email code, or a bad email from a well meaning sales rep to some email list from a "digital marketing" forum to completely wreck your server's reputation.
  - na85 5y ago
    >For businesses, especially those with enthusiastic marketing teams, it's harder because all it takes is a a bug in some transactional email code, or a bad email from a well meaning sales rep to some email list from a "digital marketing" forum to completely wreck your server's reputation. Working as intended if you ask me.
- vbezhenar 5y ago
  I think that IP address reputation is the biggest factor in mail deliverability for small servers. So when you've bought new VPS, it will be hit or miss, whether your IPv4 address was used maliciously before or not.
pbhjpbhj 5y ago
This comes up quite regularly, some of us have had major deliverability problems with SPF and DMARC and DKIM all set up. There are, it appears, other factors outside of one's control -- for me it was (at the time) MS apparently wouldn't receive my email (that was whitelisted, and from a 15yo domain with < one email per week outbound to Live.com) because a ip4 address of a server (not the one I was using) currently hosted by my hosting provider had previously been used for spam. There was no efficient way for me to move hosting provider and know that the same situation wouldn't be true, so I signed up for a new @live.com address and send emails to MS domains through that from my MUA (Thunderbird). At that time MS had a third party that managed this, you could pay them to do something that would basically get you whitelisted; but this was for an SME and the cost was prohibitive for the potential benefit. If you moved server on AWS presumably you'd have to go the same route again - who did you contact? - would you be 100% confident you'd get whitelisted?
ancarda 5y ago
How did you know to contact Microsoft to have them whitelist your IP? Was that from a DMARC report? This is the sort of thing that puts me off self-hosting email, as much as I'd like to do it -- it seems like a huge amount of effort, tracking down who I need to shout at this week to have them whitelist my IP address.
- heipei 5y ago
  Microsoft doesn’t send DMARC reports which made discovering delivery issues all the more problematic.
cube00 5y ago
If you get caught by this you can request "delivery mitigation" (i.e. removal from their IP blacklist) here: http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkID=614866 http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkID=614866 You can also join the "Smart Network Data Service" (SNDS) program, which can alert you in the future if you are re-listed and sometimes will provide additional information about why the IP has been listed. https://postmaster.live.com/snds/addnetwork.aspx https://postmaster.live.com/snds/addnetwork.aspx
- baobabKoodaa 5y ago
  > If you get caught by this you can request "delivery mitigation" (i.e. removal from their IP blacklist) here: http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkID=614866 http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkID=614866 Microsoft only provides delivery mitigation for large-volume senders. Small-volume senders (i.e. not spam senders) will not be provided delivery mitigation. That's from my personal experience anyway. > You can also join the "Smart Network Data Service" (SNDS) program, which can alert you in the future if you are re-listed and sometimes will provide additional information about why the IP has been listed. Unless you are a large-volume sender, you will not be able to get ANY information out of SNDS.
eikenberry 5y ago
Depends who you are trying to send email to. There are email providers that use IP blacklist maintainers that require you to pay a fee to keep off their blacklist if you are not a big provider (eg. they blacklist all VPS hosting companies). This was the final straw that had me switch to using a provider for SMTP (not MX, I run it still).

mgbmtl 5y ago

I run my own small-company mail server with 10 high-use accounts (using Zimbra, but it's mostly dead, so looking for alternatives). We lease small /29 blocks from OVH for our various services. Haven't had many issues in the past 5 years, except once when a user was hacked and spam was sent. 48h later things were back to normal.

nix23 5y ago
SOGo instead of Zimbra?

radiac 5y ago

I self hosted for myself and some clients for years. As long as you set up everything correctly it's fairly pain-free, but it's definitely worth getting on as many abuse notification lists as you can find - I wasn't doing anything remotely spam-related but still got blacklisted by hotmail twice and some other places a couple of times; as I remember it getting cleared was just a case of jumping through a few hoops, but I still needed to find out about the problem before my clients did, and find the hoops to jump through (which was never easy). I found the main issue was maintenance. Once it was set up it didn't need too much poking, but I was still responsible for my own downtime and backup, and every few years I'd need to move it to a new server. I ran a secondary relay so at least migrating without downtime was relatively easy, but it was still a multi-day process while I moved configurations, rules and mail across, waited to trust DNS propagation etc. And in the back of my mind if someone didn't reply in a timely manner, I couldn't ever stop wondering if I'd missed a blacklist somewhere, or if a provider had just decided to spambin everything from my IP. The other pain point was that as it was a necessary service rather than something that generated profit, I didn't want to put any serious time into improving things for myself. That meant I was using IMAP+Thunderbird with whatever shonky open source webmail-du-jour I'd set up on the server that year, combined with various shell scripts and notes in wikis about how to manage users, forwarding rules etc. It worked, but it was never easy, and was never slick. After I took a job where we all used gmail, I got used to things being easy and slick, and decided to stop self-hosting and move my mail to dedicated mail providers (fastmail and sendgrid in my case, ymmv). Haven't looked back. Self hosting you mail is something I'd recommend doing once for fun to see how it all works, but unless you have a clear and definite reason to go it alone, it's definitely worth paying someone else to do it for you.

baobabKoodaa 5y ago
> As long as you set up everything correctly it's fairly pain-free This is not true. Maybe you got it working for you (or maybe you never really measured your deliverability), but as a general advice that's just wrong. I've run my own email server for years and I've found it extremely difficult to get deliverability to Outlook and Gmail. You won't even get access to their deliverability debugging tools unless you send large volumes of email. Perversely, a small-volume sender is more likely to be classified as spam than a large-volume sender.

foolinaround 5y ago

this is indeed a big roadblock to self-hosting. There needs to be a seperate service provider that offers this expertise possibly for a fee.

cube00 5y ago
It's not so much expertise you need, you need the mail services to "trust" your address with reputation. If other providers take the hard line that Microsoft are taking now (550 refusals by default for unknown IPs) then using mail rely services like MailGun may be the only alternative for self hosting that only sends a few emails a year.

kappuchino 5y ago

I have switched from zimbra (community) to MailInABox (https://mailinabox.email https://mailinabox.email) and can say that a cheap five euros per month ssd-shared-4-virtual-cpu can manage as much as 1000nds of mails per day in and out for dozens of users with ease. So far I had not issues with spam classification, also due using a .de and .net email domain. (See stories about the infamous .xyz domains for reference) I tried Modoboa as well, but got stuck with the (lets encrypt) cerificate renewal process at that time - might be I did something wrong, don't know. Now everything runs automatic and smooth.

abdullahkhalids 5y ago

I am part of a small non-profit online workshop organization. We have a small hetzner server to host our email server. I don't think we ever had any trouble with email delivery in the year we have run it. I also set my personal email server (mailinabox on the cheapest hetzner server) last month. All my emails were accepted. Only some exchange emails to my friends were initially sent to spam, but after asking them to mark the emails as not spam, and them replying to me a few times, I have not had further delivery issues. I did have some weird kurfufle with dns last week, where my domain would not resolve. There was some notice on the namecheap website about some dns outage, but it has disappeared since then and I was too busy to explore then. I just spent yesterday resetting everything in namecheap configuration after which everything started working again.

deleted 5y ago

[deleted]

na85 5y ago

I don't run TFmailserver but I self-host a postfix+dovecot setup and deliverability has been good so far. I'm willing to try shooting you an email and we'll see if it arrives.

greggh 5y ago

I've run my own for about 4 years now with mail-in-a-box. It's on digital ocean, and it delivers fine to everyone. Like others have said, you just have to watch the lists to see if you end up in a block of IPs that gets blacklisted. It has only happened to me once, and like everyone else, it was outlook.com / live. It only took a couple days to get fixed. With mail-in-a-box you also get Nextcloud for the users, and have a nice google drive replacement with the Nextcloud client.

baobabKoodaa 5y ago
> I've run my own for about 4 years now with mail-in-a-box. It's on digital ocean, and it delivers fine to everyone. Like others have said, you just have to watch the lists to see if you end up in a block of IPs that gets blacklisted This is not true. I've also run my own server for several yes (on AWS), I've never seen the IP on any blacklists, and yet my deliverability to Outlook and Gmail is extremely bad (I've since moved on to using Postmark for sending emails).

raegis 5y ago

I'm been running a mail server on my personal domain for 20 years. The hosting provider is key. One well-known hosting provider I used to use had lots of IPs on the e-mail blacklists. I found a slightly less well-known provider without this problem. I test sending and receiving to Gmail accounts and Microsoft 365(?) accounts, and they all seem to work fine if I just configure reverse DNS, ipv6, and TLS (certificates from Let's Encrypt) correctly. I use Postfix. When I e-mail bomb (40 emails or so) from a Moodle server, sometimes emails show up in spam folders on Microsoft servers, but that's the worst of it.

wvh 5y ago

I've hosted my own email server for years; I coincidentally shut it down yesterday. Once you've got it set up properly, deliverability is quite good. The main problem is having to monitor blacklists, spam and account brute-force attacks, and typical issues with infrastructure such as disk space or DNS. Rarely anything goes wrong, but when it does, it will be at the most inconvenient time and you'll have no option but to fix it if you want to keep receiving email. Out of principle, I believe any individual should be able to self-host, but at the same time, I don't have the time and interest anymore to babysit servers for personal use. So you probably want to weigh those two things according to your own situation. The main issue these days is finding providers that allow running open mail servers and yet are not blackholed because of IP range sender reputation. A lot of the cheaper server providers have to fight relatively lot of abuse so you're stuck between a rock and a hard place having to convince both your own provider as well as the mail servers you send to of your good intentions. There should probably be a provider aimed specifically at email servers that takes extra care it has IP ranges that never host spammers, cryptocurrency, tor nodes, botnets and whatnot.

baobabKoodaa 5y ago

> How is deliverability on a self-hosted solution like this? It's extremely difficult to deliver email to Outlook and Gmail Inboxes from a self-hosted solution on a cloud (or residential) IP address. I wrote more about my experience here: https://www.attejuvonen.fi/dont-send-email-from-your-own-server/ https://www.attejuvonen.fi/dont-send-email-from-your-own-ser...