3 ms·
Ideally, sure. It is just my personal opinion that anti-science does not have equal value as science and should not be found right alongside it. Given the corr
by kwinten 5y ago
Ideally, sure.
It is just my personal opinion that anti-science does not have equal value as science and should not be found right alongside it. Given the correct context and time and place, I don't fundamentally have an issue with the books existing or people being able to read them.
- camdenlock 5y agoAn idea is not “anti-science” merely because it makes you or anyone else feel uncomfortable.
- orwin 5y ago4. Someone who thinks that homosexuality is immoral and dangerous. I'd argue that this is anti-science. The biological theory "en vogue" is that homosexuality (not the sexual act, the falling in love part) is determined by hormonal balance during pregnancy. I don't think any theory argue that this is dangerous, and well, about immorality, it has nothing to do with science. So this idea is anti-science, and i don't think is interesting enough to take a spot on a shelf in a science university. Maybe in the reserve. Are you disagreeing with that?
- esyir 5y agoMorality has little to do with science, and this case is not different. For an extreme example we determined that murderous psychopathy was related to a developmental hiccup, would you be surprised that people would call it immoral or dangerous?
- baobabKoodaa 5y agoSo which is it? If someone says "homosexuality is immoral", is it anti-science, or does it "have nothing to do with science"? You can't have both.