3 ms·
Ah, yes, more surveillance is surely the answer.
by davisr 5y ago
Ah, yes, more surveillance is surely the answer.
- CobaltFire 5y agoOf technicians accessing a device that is that personal and many people consider secure due to Apple's own marketing? Absolutely.
- MikeDelta 5y agoLogging is not necessarily surveilance. It is about you seeing what they do with your phone.
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]
- kergonath 5y agoIt is not surveillance, it is transparency. IT support people are in a position of power where they have access to a lot of personal information, and the users should definitely know if there has been a data breach. And somebody getting access to things like bank records of home-made personal porn definitively is a breach. Ideally, they should not be in a situation where they can access any personal file without the owner being present.
- Supermancho 5y ago> There should also be audit logs recorded by the device and sent to the user's Apple account. The recording of every app opening, every site, every click being sent to organizations is lamented normally, and then desired if put into the right narrative. This is part of the reason we got where we are.
- TeMPOraL 5y agoNot really. The position is, and always has been: the vendor should not be entitled to data about what the user is doing with their device. The user is absolutely entitled to the data about how the device they own is being used, whether by themselves, someone else, or remotely by a third party.
- Dylan16807 5y agoBecause you're removing the very obvious part that the problem is recording a user. A log of the repair process is not the same thing.