3 ms·
You're just exemplifying the point. Who says you have to announce something a specific way first time? Back in the days it would be "you can't just publish tri
by capableweb 6y ago
You're just exemplifying the point. Who says you have to announce something a specific way first time?
Back in the days it would be "you can't just publish trial papers, it has to go through the church"
- marcosdumay 6y ago> Who says you have to announce something a specific way first time? Technically, at our current World state, government regulations say that. And yeah, you have to have the correct credentials and submit your paper to the correct institutions. Superficially, the system is architectured exactly like the one you are complaining, while in a deeper level every component works in a completely different way. What in practice means that it right now works quite well (could improve, but it works), but it's just a series of isolated institution failings (instead of a full system failure) away from becoming like the other. So, well, keep those institutions in check, but unless somebody comes up with a better system design, there's little point on complaining about it.
- nradov 6y agoWhich government regulations are those? Could you please provide a CFR citation?
- pessimizer 6y agoThe World Fact Check Act of 2023.
- klyrs 6y agoYes, back in the day, the church would censor evidence that it disagreed with. Today, we demand evidence to back up claims whether or not we want to believe them.