4 ms·
I'm not entirely sure that it was possible to pardon Assange as he hasn't been convicted with anything yet? As in , I thought the extradition request was to be
by thinkingemote 6y ago
I'm not entirely sure that it was possible to pardon Assange as he hasn't been convicted with anything yet?
As in , I thought the extradition request was to be sent to USA for a trial.
- adventured 6y agoYou can pardon people before they're convicted of anything. Trump pardoned Steve Bannon for example and he has not yet been convicted (he has been charged). Assange has been charged with various things by the Feds, which is what Trump would pardon. The floated theory went that Trump could plausibly pardon himself as well, for any likely future charges.
- astrange 6y agoIt's questionable if you can pardon yourself or your coconspirators, and you specifically can't pardon yourself for things you were impeached for. It's not questionable if you can pardon things that haven't been charged yet. You can. The pardon power is absolute, greater than laws that define specific crimes, and doesn't require accepting guilt or whatever.
- vharuck 6y ago>It's not questionable if you can pardon things that haven't been charged yet. You can. For a specific example, Jimmy Carter pardoned everyone who dodged the draft for Vietnam[1]. This showed that pardons could both apply to actions which hadn't been charged and categories of people. I think one of the only limits on the pardon power is that it can only apply to past behavior. [1] https://www.justice.gov/pardon/vietnam-war-era-pardon-instructions https://www.justice.gov/pardon/vietnam-war-era-pardon-instru...
- ghaff 6y agoIf a president were to do something really nutty like "Everyone now has a clean slate with respect to federal crimes" I suspect the Supreme Court would find some way to invalidate it. Carter's pardon, while controversial, fell into the category of these weren't exactly serial killers and a lot of people in the country were ready to move on.
- dragonwriter 6y ago> This showed that pardons could both apply to actions which hadn't been charged and categories of people. It doesn't actually show that because the legal effect of thar pardon has never been challenged. If no one tries to charge someone subject to a pardon, or that pardon recipient never offers the pardon against the charges, nothing is resolved about the validity and effect of the pardon.
- Supermancho 6y ago> can't pardon yourself for things you were impeached for That's because impeachment is a political process, not a judicial proceeding. Clemency does not affect impeachment.
- dragonwriter 6y agoThat may be the rationale for the limit, but the legal reason is because the Constitution expressly limits the pardon power to exclude cases of impeachment.
- dragonwriter 6y ago> you specifically can’t pardon yourself for things you were impeached for. The pardon power applies to offenses against the US “except in cases of impeachment” (Art. II § 2 ¶ 1). This uncontroversially means a pardon cannot affect the process of impeachment in the House and trial on charges of impeachment in the Senate. It is disputed whether it also somehow prevents pardons for criminal charges relating to the same act for which the recipient was impeached. The issue has never come up in a nontheoretical sense, so an authoritative resolution hasn’t been handed down.
- thinkingemote 6y agoThanks!
- libria 6y ago> You can pardon people before they're convicted of anything. Ford pardoning Nixon is the usual example.
- dabernathy89 6y agoThe most famous pardon in history - Gerald Ford's pardon of Richard Nixon - involved no convictions or charges/indictments: > [I]... do grant a full, free, and absolute pardon unto Richard Nixon for all offenses against the United States which he, Richard Nixon, has committed or may have committed or taken part in during the period from January 20, 1969 through August 9,1974. https://www.fordlibrarymuseum.gov/library/speeches/740061.asp https://www.fordlibrarymuseum.gov/library/speeches/740061.as...