5 ms·

Has a real interest in only this subject apparently: https://news.ycombinator.com/submitted?id=salmon30salmon https://news.ycombinator.com/submitted?id=salmon30

Has a real interest in only this subject apparently: https://news.ycombinator.com/submitted?id=salmon30salmon https://news.ycombinator.com/submitted?id=salmon30salmon

salmon30salmon 6y ago
See my response to the parent. Yes, coronavirus gets me all hot and bothered.
monoideism 6y ago
What are you insinuating, exactly?
- salmon30salmon 6y ago
  He is saying I am either a troll or a pawn.
  - nobody9999 6y ago
    >He is saying I am either a troll or a pawn. I didn't interpret that comment the same way at all. I think the gist of it can be summed up by (purportedly) Winston Churchill: "A fanatic is one who can't change his mind and won't change the subject." If, as you suggest, you're using a semi-throwaway account specifically to discuss COVID, unless other folks know that, your posting history with this account would likely give that impression.
- elliekelly 6y ago
  I’m not the person you’re replying to but I do think anyone who comes to HN to discuss primarily one narrow (and politically contentious) topic isn’t participating in HN in good faith. There’s no effort to “gratify one’s intellectual curiosity” or “have curious conversation” if you’ve arrived with an agenda.
  - salmon30salmon 6y ago
    Because you know the links I click on. Or maybe, and I know this is crazy, but maybe this isn't my primary account as people have been mobbed and cancelled for having contrarian views on Covid!
  - monoideism 6y ago
    Fair enough, but you don't think we all come to HN with agendas?
_Understated_ 6y ago
Well, in salmon30salmon's defence: the mainstream media are completely and utterly missing in action when it comes to COVID. They only parrot what the gov tells them and investigate nothing these days. There are countless credible scientists saying that we are getting this incredibly wrong on so many levels yet mainstream media does not mention anything other than government narrative. When did you see any news coverage of criticism of the "vaccine"? I mean, on a scientific level, not government ineptitude at rolling it out. Edit: I can't reply for some reason but here's a video talking about the "vaccine"[0] and here's the Great Barrington Declaration[1]. Here is criticism from the BMJ [2] stating that (according to my maths) it's only 19% effective... in addition, it's designed to TREAT the symptoms, not cure you... what kind of vaccine is that? [0] - https://www.bitchute.com/video/edombs4NcvQ6/ https://www.bitchute.com/video/edombs4NcvQ6/ [1] - https://gbdeclaration.org/ https://gbdeclaration.org/ [2] - https://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2021/01/04/peter-doshi-pfizer-and-modernas-95-effective-vaccines-we-need-more-details-and-the-raw-data/ https://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2021/01/04/peter-doshi-pfizer-and-...
- DanBC 6y ago
  > When did you see any news coverage of criticism of the "vaccine"? There's no credible criticism of the vaccine. Can you point to any?
  - _Understated_ 6y ago
    See my edit above... couldn't reply at the time for some reason
  - fatsdomino001 6y ago
    I suspect what you deem credible is substantially different from what's credible to people who are critical of the covid mrna treatment.
    - _Understated_ 6y ago
      But there is NO criticism at all... credible or not.
deleted 6y ago
[deleted]

Has a real interest in only this subject apparently: https://news.ycombinator.com/submitted?id=salmon30salmon https://news.ycombinator.com/submitted?id=salmon30salmon

salmon30salmon 6y ago

See my response to the parent. Yes, coronavirus gets me all hot and bothered.

monoideism 6y ago

What are you insinuating, exactly?

salmon30salmon 6y ago
He is saying I am either a troll or a pawn.
- nobody9999 6y ago
  >He is saying I am either a troll or a pawn. I didn't interpret that comment the same way at all. I think the gist of it can be summed up by (purportedly) Winston Churchill: "A fanatic is one who can't change his mind and won't change the subject." If, as you suggest, you're using a semi-throwaway account specifically to discuss COVID, unless other folks know that, your posting history with this account would likely give that impression.
elliekelly 6y ago
I’m not the person you’re replying to but I do think anyone who comes to HN to discuss primarily one narrow (and politically contentious) topic isn’t participating in HN in good faith. There’s no effort to “gratify one’s intellectual curiosity” or “have curious conversation” if you’ve arrived with an agenda.
- salmon30salmon 6y ago
  Because you know the links I click on. Or maybe, and I know this is crazy, but maybe this isn't my primary account as people have been mobbed and cancelled for having contrarian views on Covid!
- monoideism 6y ago
  Fair enough, but you don't think we all come to HN with agendas?

_Understated_ 6y ago

Well, in salmon30salmon's defence: the mainstream media are completely and utterly missing in action when it comes to COVID. They only parrot what the gov tells them and investigate nothing these days. There are countless credible scientists saying that we are getting this incredibly wrong on so many levels yet mainstream media does not mention anything other than government narrative. When did you see any news coverage of criticism of the "vaccine"? I mean, on a scientific level, not government ineptitude at rolling it out. Edit: I can't reply for some reason but here's a video talking about the "vaccine"[0] and here's the Great Barrington Declaration[1]. Here is criticism from the BMJ [2] stating that (according to my maths) it's only 19% effective... in addition, it's designed to TREAT the symptoms, not cure you... what kind of vaccine is that? [0] - https://www.bitchute.com/video/edombs4NcvQ6/ https://www.bitchute.com/video/edombs4NcvQ6/ [1] - https://gbdeclaration.org/ https://gbdeclaration.org/ [2] - https://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2021/01/04/peter-doshi-pfizer-and-modernas-95-effective-vaccines-we-need-more-details-and-the-raw-data/ https://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2021/01/04/peter-doshi-pfizer-and-...

DanBC 6y ago
> When did you see any news coverage of criticism of the "vaccine"? There's no credible criticism of the vaccine. Can you point to any?
- _Understated_ 6y ago
  See my edit above... couldn't reply at the time for some reason
- fatsdomino001 6y ago
  I suspect what you deem credible is substantially different from what's credible to people who are critical of the covid mrna treatment.
  - _Understated_ 6y ago
    But there is NO criticism at all... credible or not.

deleted 6y ago

[deleted]