4 ms·
No 'obscene usernames' is actually hilarious to me. The bastion of free speech won't even allow users to choose their own handles.
by whymauri 6y ago
No 'obscene usernames' is actually hilarious to me. The bastion of free speech won't even allow users to choose their own handles.
- SV_BubbleTime 6y agoI'm confused as to how some people here are simultaneously digging on Parler for speech they "allowed", and then also that "they weren't really free speech". What is it you wanted them to do? I think it's pretty reasonable to not have "See me on Parler @ParlerLovesNaziPussy" as that content that Parler could not control outside of their platform. Restricting usernames seems like a prudent move, even for a free speech platform.
- KallDrexx 6y agoPeople aren't digging on parlor for speech they allowed while criticizing them for not being free speech. They are criticizing them because they heavily advertised to people that they should go to parlor claiming that it was meant to fight for free speech because Twitter and other platforms were restricting free speech. Except Parler itself was restricting free speech on it's own and thus people are rightfully pointing out the hypocrisy. It shows that Parler wasn't in favor of free speech, it was in favor of "our side".
- meekmockmook 6y ago"Remember what the MPAA says; Horrific, Deplorable violence is okay, as long as people don't say any naughty words"
- throwaway19937 6y agoI've always liked this interpretation of MPAA ratings. “If a man is pictured chopping off a woman’s breast, it only gets an R rating; but if, God forbid, a man is pictured kissing a woman’s breast, it gets an X rating. Why is violence more acceptable than tenderness?” — Sally Struthers
- dkirill 6y agoWhat does decent language requirement have to do with free speech?