Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
KallDrexx
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
7 ms
·
1.
▲
by
KallDrexx
26d ago
Interesting thanks I'll give some of these a try. I know at least some of my slowness is crowdstrike, especially since I can A/B test non-Emacs operations with some coworkers with older machines that don't have the bad config
2.
▲
by
KallDrexx
26d ago
magit is brutal when EDR is involved.
3.
▲
by
KallDrexx
26d ago
I notice it on macOS, which I use for work. I use Linux personally but no EDR there :) There are just so many little operations that cause stuttering on macOS with an unfortunately over-eager crowdstrike configuration. Magit is the worst o
4.
▲
by
KallDrexx
26d ago
You know what makes Emacs feel slow? Corporate EDR BS. I thought Emacs was terrible to use until I realized it was extremely fast on my home computer. All the pauses that EDR does combined with Emacs mostly single threadedness is a bummer.
5.
▲
by
KallDrexx
1mo ago
Thanks! Glad at least someone found it useful :)
6.
▲
by
KallDrexx
1mo ago
I recently switched from full IDE to Emacs (wrote up about the things I learned at https://github.com/KallDrexx/emacs-zero-to-ide-journey/blob/... ) Typescript is a perfect example of why Emacs shouldn't
7.
▲
Show HN: My Emacs Zero to IDE Journey
(github.com)
15 points
by
KallDrexx
1mo ago
|
2 comments
8.
▲
by
KallDrexx
2mo ago
I am spending a lot of time trying to migrate from decades of JetBrains IDEs to Emacs. It's not trivial though and it's a good thing I am willing to tinker and explore. I got a decent Neovim development setup going in a few days
9.
▲
by
KallDrexx
4mo ago
Ooooh awesome thanks!
10.
▲
by
KallDrexx
4mo ago
FWIW I'm using Yosis for my Ice40 Lattice FPGA purely because their Linux support is bad. Getting a free hobby license requires emailing them with MAC addresses (which means I have to do that for my desktop, laptop, and again for any f
11.
▲
by
KallDrexx
5mo ago
> Thinking more deeply about your words, is it that you enjoy figuring out the instructions to use to solve a problem? In other words, figuring out the algorithm and writing the code out to create something? Would you feel if you just te
12.
▲
by
KallDrexx
5mo ago
Yeah and that's totally fair! We are all motivated by different things and being extrinsically motivated isn't a bad thing at all. But being more interested in the problems rather than the solutions (and not wanting to "produ
13.
▲
by
KallDrexx
5mo ago
I have done a lot of introspection on this and realized that I'm very much driven by intrinsic rewards moreso than extrinsic. I got into coding over a decade before it was my career because of the exploration, learning, and puzzle/
14.
▲
by
KallDrexx
5mo ago
Fwiw git history can be forged pretty easily. You can re-timestamp commits
15.
▲
by
KallDrexx
5mo ago
Afaict the company doesn't own any of what was written by an LLM. In theory that means all the companies are opening themselves up to code being reused by third party and a lack of legal protection. In reality I fear it's going to
16.
▲
by
KallDrexx
5mo ago
When you write code by hand, you are the author. As part of your contract with your employer you grant copyright and authorship to your employer by default (as stated in the contract). The LLM is not employed by you or your employer, becaus
17.
▲
by
KallDrexx
5mo ago
This isn't what the copyright means. The employees and contractors are the authors, and because of the contract they sign they assign copyright to the corporation. Corporations, as a collection of humans are allowed to have authorship.
18.
▲
by
KallDrexx
5mo ago
I don't think case law totally supports the idea that working on a line by line basis means you have "no problem claiming copyright". There problem is the LLM is still making assumptions on that line of code and thus it'
19.
▲
by
KallDrexx
5mo ago
It's in fact the opposite from what I've read. In one of the supreme court cases cited by the copyright office itself in its opinion of AI works ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Community_for_Creative_Non-Vio..
20.
▲
by
KallDrexx
5mo ago
Do you think that human directing the agent owns copyright for any legal reason? The case Community for Creative Non Violence Vs Reid ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Community_for_Creative_Non-Vio... ) solidifies a supre
21.
▲
by
KallDrexx
6mo ago
The problem I have with this analysis is it's missing the multi-dimensional aspect of "is this profitable". It's fair to say that if all these operators are competing for tokens, that the OpenRouter token operator (not s
22.
▲
by
KallDrexx
6mo ago
The copyright office is pretty clear on this if you read: https://www.copyright.gov/ai/Copyright-and-Artificial-Intell... . There is case law surrounding the fact that just because you commission a work to another entit
23.
▲
by
KallDrexx
7mo ago
Which actual FPGA is this running on? I've been extremely curious on this space and would love to know what it took to actually get this to run.
24.
▲
Investigating the Downstream Effect of AI Assistants on Software Maintainability
(arxiv.org)
2 points
by
KallDrexx
8mo ago
|
2 comments
25.
▲
by
KallDrexx
8mo ago
This study came up on my feed but I'm not seeing much chatter on it. I'm interested in some perspectives from people who are better at reading if studies are quality or not. > Abstract > > AI assistants, like GitHub Copi
26.
▲
Commodore 64 JIT compilation into MSIL
(old.reddit.com)
7 points
by
KallDrexx
8mo ago
|
0 comments
27.
▲
by
KallDrexx
9mo ago
Yeah I don't disagree that selling components is going to be hard business in the age of AI. Just mostly pointing out that it was a good business previously.
28.
▲
by
KallDrexx
9mo ago
Telerik, DevExpress, and a lot of other companies have made profitable businesses that have lasted well over a decade on that business premise. Selling solid and easy to integrate pre-made components has been a pretty good business for a w
29.
▲
by
KallDrexx
10mo ago
FWIW I only mentioned staff engineers because the survey found staff+ engineers reported the highest time savings. The survey itself had time savings averages for junior (3.9), Mid level (4.3), Senior (4.1) and Staff (4.4).
30.
▲
by
KallDrexx
10mo ago
The latest survey is here apparently: https://getdx.com/report/ai-assisted-engineering-q4-impact-r... . No idea if signing up gives the full survey for free. We get it through our company paying for DX's services
More ›