3 ms·
On average [Not-Race] has more wealth to afford houses, or home ownership is more common than [Race] in these programs. You do see anger when individuals perce
by lumost 6y ago
On average [Not-Race] has more wealth to afford houses, or home ownership is more common than [Race] in these programs.
You do see anger when individuals perceive they can't afford homes, school, or other big ticket items and perceive that they aren't given help - but that isn't quite the same as denying people something.
- pbhjpbhj 6y ago>On average [Not-Race] has more wealth to afford houses // Which is fine if you're part of that the well-off, but if you're just a person and not benefitted by the categroy association with rich people who happen to be the same race -- a simplistic association that discriminatory, racist people make -- then you're shit out of luck. Discriminating against people is denying them something, it's denying them a fair shot, fair treatment by the government. Regardless of their sex or skin colour they deserve fair opportunity.
- yjftsjthsd-h 6y ago> perceive that they aren't given help - but that isn't quite the same as denying people something. How is that not denying them help? > On average [Not-Race] has more wealth to afford houses, or home ownership is more common than [Race] in these programs. So why not just have your aid program be based on wealth, rather than race?