3 ms·
> The next interesting point will be the obvious consolidation and licensing wars when customers get tired of maintaining 4 or 5 streaming licenses. I'd say th
by rement 6y ago
> The next interesting point will be the obvious consolidation and licensing wars when customers get tired of maintaining 4 or 5 streaming licenses.
I'd say that is already happening. I was surprised at first when I saw "The Simpsons" on Disney+ but I remembered that Disney purchased Fox entertainment last year. Disney already owns "Star Wars", "Marvel", "ESPN", "Pixar", and their own back catalog. There are other big players out there but Disney has a huge catalog.
- huhtenberg 6y ago> Disney already owns ... And yet paradoxically there's still very little to watch on Disney+, because only a fraction of their huge catalog is actually accessible and what _is_ available, it's just the same old material, watched and re-watched a million times already. At least that's how it is here, in Europe, not sure about the US. I ended up dropping Disney+ subscription in exactly 1 month because there was nothing interesting left to watch. It was a rather strange experience TBH.
- erklik 6y agoand whatever is there, their need to be child-friendly tends to block or worse, make them edit movies. There was a scene in the 1984 Splash where a naked butt is seen, the re-edited scene went fairly viral where they tired to extend the long hair of the female so it covered her butt. (Horribly done btw)
- dekhn 6y agothat scene was a highlight of my childhood (I was 11 at the time) and tbh I wouldn't really want my kids to see a censored version of it.
- rkuykendall-com 6y agoThe service only launched this time last year, and I get the impression they are still processing the backlog as well as waiting for previous licenses to expire.