4 ms·
And SF is the worst large city for dating in the world.
by sergefaguet 6y ago
And SF is the worst large city for dating in the world.
- Balgair 6y agoI'd say LA is worse, but not by much. Every date is a 75 minutes away and then 75 minutes back. SF is only 72 minutes ;)
- sergefaguet 6y agoLA has cool, attractive people. Which, especially for a straight guy, SF really does not. Plus if you are in Santa Monica or Venice the traffic to get to other cool places is not that bad.
- georgeecollins 6y agoThe trick to LA is that it is huge, and you will tend to gravitate to certain parts. Different parts have different attractions. When I met my wife we both lived near by Fairfax & 3rd, which meant I could walk to her apartment. What didn't occur to me at the time was that we lived close to each other because we liked a lot of the same things and had similar life priorities. In retrospect location was a sorting mechanism that worked great for us.
- georgeecollins 6y agoAs someone who grew up in SF and went to school in LA, all this talk of where it is hard to date seems silly. People always like to complain about things like that but the truth is dating can be hard for some people anywhere.
- Redoubts 6y agoNo, there are absolutely strong forces which bring different kinds of people to one city over another.
- georgeecollins 6y agoSure, every place is different. But what is your evidence that dating is harder in one city vs another?
- seanmcdirmid 6y agoIf you are a guy. It isn’t bad for girls.