18 ms·
How Normal Am I?
- chromatin 6y agoVery interesting, but hangs at the last(?) step (life expectancy)
- nbulka 6y agoCould they be trying to make a point? About insurance abuses of this technology maybe? maybe not, could just be the algorithm failing. Or maybe they don't want to assume the liability of actually providing a number.
- yosser 6y agoNo, it's a javascript error. The second time around I agreed to the terms and conditions and then the site worked fine.
- socialcooling 6y agoYikes. Thanks, I'll look into it. The terms and conditions have no influence on this, but it could that that one of the scores required to create the life expectancy prediction is missing (age, gender, bmi, country).
- entropicdrifter 6y agoMy life expectancy was the only score that it didn't give me. It just stayed at ... and then marked that as not normal
- socialcooling 6y agoI found the issue, and it should hopefully be fixed. It happened if your IP address couldn't be used to predict your location.
- TonyTrapp 6y agoDoes it fall back to US if the IP address can't be used? Because this would be the first time a GeoIP database would move my EU IP address to the US...
- socialcooling 6y agoYes you are correct.
- yen223 6y agoIt looks like they're trying to guess at your life expectancy through your country, which they're guessing at using your IP address, which they can only get at if you agreed to the terms and conditions
- kevinmgranger 6y agoI think the link to the Sherpa Project is wrong. It should be https://www.project-sherpa.eu/ https://www.project-sherpa.eu/
- socialcooling 6y agoYou're right! Thanks, I've fixed it!
- wodenokoto 6y agoThat was simply amazing. Having the video guide you through all the machine learning prediction steps as they got analyzed on your video feed worked flawless, both in terms of technical execution but also presentatio nwise. They also made some great points about how ridiculous some of these algorithms are (shake your head to lose 10 years of age, or just trying to predict BMI from a face photo)
- cvrjk 6y agoAnd I was surprised to know that this has made its way into hiring! So, the job hunt is going to get even more superfluous? Really reminds me of that Episode in Black Mirror, where everything depends on your rating..
- owouwuowo 6y agoApperantly when the website thinks you are a woman, it marks that column down as "Normal: No", because 82% of visitors are men. Just something to think about. Also it called me ugly :< Edit: I just ran the website for a second time and didn't change my clothes or anything, and it gave me very different results. ie. gender, age, bmi, attractiveness all different. I don't think the ratings for this is very stable & reproducible. at least it rated my girlfriend as abnormally attractive. :)
- socialcooling 6y agoAge and gender are derived using the FaceApiJS project. In my own experience it's doesn't vary as wildly if you're a white male. With other ethnicities the predictability levels can drop, especially if you're Asian.
- junon 6y agoHey it's you! You wrote social cooling too, which I really enjoyed. Great site. Thank you for sharing it.
- socialcooling 6y agoYou're very welcome.
- JimTheMan 6y agoWhat was the beauty score for that? Number wise. The scale is huge!
- gwd 6y ago> I don't think the ratings for this is very stable & reproducible. I think that's part of the point though -- the claim is that these are being used, regardless of how predictable they are.
- madeofpalk 6y agoI think this is entirely the point - to highlight how these algorithms are used in every day life, and how unreliable they are. It points it out by "raising your eyebrows to make it think you're less fat" and "move your head around to change your age".
- phibz 6y agoInterestingly it guessed my BMI at 38. To get to that number for my height I would have to be twice my current weight.
- Uberphallus 6y agoYeah, if you train a model with pictures of the same person, or maybe their family, you may be able to guess the BMI from the face, after all, the face stores fat in a non linear way. But I remember back in college a friend was severely overweight and eventually he was motivated to lose weight. Diet and exercise details aside, in a couple of years he became a BMI 28, but very low fat, ripped and chiseled muscled up individual. But interestingly, he mostly kept his fat person face, those cheeks, while they shrank, weren't going away.
- Ftuuky 6y ago"Violently average" oof Great website to share with my non-tech friends and family, they're tired of my rants but this is very well articulated. Any chances of including other languages for wider reach?
- Vinnl 6y agoIt linked to the Dutch version at the end (the author is Dutch, judging by their name and accent): https://www.hoenormaalbenik.nl https://www.hoenormaalbenik.nl
- kyuudou 6y ago67% normal abnormally young, which is a normal observation by others of me. The life expectancy is probably fair even though BMI is just about right, 19.6 Am not a good boy :-D This is fascinating and I also approve of the cause and message. Yet more reasons to have a simple camera cover.
- dundercoder 6y agoAccuracy side, I thought the presentation was excellent! I really like the explanation playing while the analysis is taking place. I’m totally going to steal this presentation idea.
- junon 6y agoThe average beauty score ranges from something like -150000 to +150000. Not sure why!
- socialcooling 6y agoI suspect someone has tried to manipulate their score. I found one database entry that had only an extreme beauty score. I've hardened the system against this now.
- senectus1 6y agoyikes! I seems to think I only have 20 years left to live. I'm only in my mid 40's
- rebuilder 6y agoMeanwhile, I'm going to live to be 120! Boy am I glad I visited this site!
- hew7djdndh 6y agoLOL funny how people here gibber about privacy but are more than happy to give their face to some rando website. Y'all are fucking muppets.
- etothepii 6y agoIs a picture without personally identifying information problematic? I assume pre-COVID you didn't walk around in a mask all the time.
- codegladiator 6y agohttps://www.nbcnews.com/tech/security/millions-people-uploaded-photos-ever-app-then-company-used-them-n1003371 https://www.nbcnews.com/tech/security/millions-people-upload... https://hypebeast.com/2019/7/faceapp-120-million-users-faces-names-user-agreement-wireless-labs https://hypebeast.com/2019/7/faceapp-120-million-users-faces...
- DoingIsLearning 6y agoI wonder how many people who actually upload a photo to this site will even bother to remove EXIF data? If you have all the original metadata in a typical smartphone camera JPEG, then things like the info below is available: - camera model - phone model - time & date of when the picture was taken - geo-location of where the picture was taken I would say for anyone motivated enough that is pretty easily identifiable. edit: bullet points formatting edit2: lewispollard rightly pointed out that I should read before writing. :)
- lewispollard 6y agoIt uses a live feed from your camera, not a photo.
- rd07 6y agoI share your concern and decided to not try the website. The site said no personal data is collected, and if we opt to share our data, it would be anonimized. Well yeah, but how about browser fingerprint? is that considered as a personal data? or if it's collected at all? edit: Okay, I succumbed to my curiosity and decided to try it but with all my connection turned off. As far as my obeservation goes, at least there are no ajax call from this site and everything is functioning even without connection.
- jstummbillig 6y agoCan't switch to front camera on pixel 3a?
- chki 6y agoSame problem for me on a pixel 3.
- jjbinx007 6y agoDitto on Huawei Mate 20 X
- anonymfus 6y agoThe same in Firefox on Samsung Galaxy A40, Firefox version is 81.1.1 (Build #2015764547). I missed the puppy because of that.
- _def 6y agoSame with Firefox and Chrome on Pixel xl
- socialcooling 6y agoYikes. I'll look into it. I take it you tried the button in the top-left to switch? Were you able to select the other camera if you reloaded the page?
- nudpiedo 6y agothe only data I reported was my age... and it had some big misses, like BMI being much less than it really is just because of beard. Also it said my life expentancy is going to be up to 81 years old, when in reality I will live forever :')
- wartijn_ 6y agoNice project :) Too bad it doesn't say how old it thinks you are though (or I missed it) All I know now is that it thinks I lied about my age, which I didn't. I'm just going to assume I look like I'm 20
- ibudiallo 6y agoAh, this one couldn't find my face. It kept focusing on my left ear and gave it a 5 for attractiveness. Then it couldn't find my face any longer. There was another fun one posted here months ago [1]. I wanna say I'm disappointed, but I'd be lying. I'm happy that A.I. cannot detect us black people. I'll need to do something about that left ear though. [1]: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21337863 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21337863
- moksly 6y agoThe only person I know who did something about his left ear, did admirable. Just don’t wrap the ear in a newspaper and hand it to a prostitute, as I doubt that sort of thing will work out well in these modern times.
- Twisol 6y agoBefore googling: Is this a van Gogh reference? After googling: Yep, that's a van Gogh reference. https://www.vangoghgallery.com/misc/van-goghs-ear.html https://www.vangoghgallery.com/misc/van-goghs-ear.html > Vincent took the ear and wrapped it in newspaper. With a hat pulled down over his wound, he, with ear in hand, left the house to go to a “maison de tolerance”, a brothel close to the house. There he asked for a girl named Rachel who he gave the ear to saying “Guard this object carefully.”
- dirtnugget 6y agoWhatever drugs he was taking, I want them
- coldtea 6y agoIt was just that he had forgotten that she had invited him, and it was a Sunday and all the gift shops were closed...
- augusto-moura 6y ago
- blago 6y agoBMI was way off but the metric itself is such a crude generalization so this is probably excusable.
- globular-toast 6y agoMine was predicted much lower than it really is, but I'm lean with big muscles, so that is to be expected, I suppose.
- blago 6y agoExactly! My real BMI is 25, and just like you, I am on the muscular side. The estimate was 19.
- socialcooling 6y agoYou may enjoy this blogpost I made that goes into how the BMI prediction algorithm was developed. It's the only one in the project that I trained myself. https://www.sherpapieces.eu/overview/predicting-your-bmi-from-a-just-photo-a-github-safari https://www.sherpapieces.eu/overview/predicting-your-bmi-fro... Like you said, muscles matter quite a bit. It's attractive to use photos af athletes to train the algorithm, because there are a lot of websites that show their photos along with their weight and height (which you need to calculate a BMI). But since muscles weigh so much more than fat, athletes have high BMI with slim bodies, which warps the algorithm. I didn't use athletes for this reason (it's trained on a diet of 50% Chinese celebrities and 50% American arrest records). But I found projects that do use these photos.
- kwhitefoot 6y agoMy BMI is 25.2 and the webpage calculated 25.1. It would have been interesting to see some summary statistics for each of the predictions.
- tralarpa 6y agoWhat a great website and cool way to present a technical topic. Online education is still in its infancy and when we talk nowadays about good examples of online education, we usually think of videos and (in the best case) of websites where students can play with interactive models, solve exercises, etc. But this website demonstrates that you can still go mucher further in involving the listener as a person. This of course requires an enormous effort in the preparation of the material.
- colordrops 6y agoAgreed. I found the presentation of the material more interesting and innovative than the topic itself.
- limbicsystem 6y agoI second this. I've just spent the summer putting together an online experiment for a student along similar lines: https://www.doesmyrobotunderstand.me/ https://www.doesmyrobotunderstand.me/ (please, feel free! We need subjects...) I wish I'd known about the Javascript face analysis beforehand! And also how hard it would be to learn Javascript ;) And how to do that cool embedded video thing.
- lkbm 6y agoThe immediate feedback about how I did is nice, but also may pollute the data in a way. Once I got it right, I new to retry a very similar expression for the next 1-2 tries. But then, most people might actually know how to make human expressions naturally. Personally, I appreciated this as a tool to help me learn how to human. :-)
- quantumwoke 6y agoThis website doesn't work at all for me (Safari, iOS 13). After asking for permission the video becomes modal and impossible to close, completely hijacking my browser and forcing me to quit the app. That's the state of JS in 2020 I guess.
- socialcooling 6y agooh, thanks for bringing that to my attention, I'll look into it.
- mettamage 6y agoInteresting, it couldn't detect my face.
- Kiro 6y agoThe interaction heat map blocks the Skip button. I just wanted to see the score so I skipped all the talk but that also meant that my skipping made me unable to skip after that step.
- vickyks 6y agoThe AI rated me a 4 out of 10 and struggled to figure out whether I was a man or a woman. There goes my self esteem for the day.
- neurostimulant 6y agoJust shining my phone's flashlight to my face increase the score by 1 point. Maybe try with a better lighting? You might get a 10 score ;)
- brushfoot 6y agoYou're in good company: The app gave Henry Cavill 5.9 and Pierce Brosnan 5.1 in my testing.
- skytreader 6y agoSo apparently the algorithms say I'm almost 10 years younger than I actually am (late 20s, algos say I'm just about to get my student driver's license). I wanted to see how much the camera quality affects these scores so I wanted to try on mobile but I can't get it to switch to the front camera.
- CameronNemo 6y agoIf you are on Android then you can try firefox mobile. It allowed me to select which camera to use.
- Radim 6y agoThe results were predictably "AI" = complete rubbish. Even though I'm a white male. Our brave new world of "computer said so"… Great presentation though, kudos!
- balabaster 6y agoApparently I lied about my age, it predicts that I'm actually 8 years younger than I am which is fun. It also tells me my BMI is about 9 points lower than reality which is also fun. And that I've got as long left to live as I have lived already which is pretty awesome. But it also tells me I'm ugly, which isn't so much fun :P At least it correctly identified me as a man with 97% certainty. So I can stop worrying about that now :D
- brogrammer2018 6y agoYea, the AI didn't think I was attractive either, although I take care of my appearance :/
- danielmg 6y agoIt said I was 16 years younger than I am. Which is nice.
- daliusd 6y agoSame here. While I know that I look younger than I'm - once many people assumed that I'm 10 years younger. So it is quite cool to fool algorithm too. As well algorithm thinks that I'm quite ugly. Well, I don't care even if algorithm is right, as algorithm is not my second wife.
- renewiltord 6y agoThis is such a flattering website: * 5.5 with glasses, 7.5 without. Glad I wear contacts, I guess. * Age predicted: 20, truth: 30+ * BMI predicted: 18.7, truth: 22
- addandsubtract 6y agoThis was their plan all along. To harvest the data people leave in the comments. Cunningham's Law in effect ;)
- renewiltord 6y agoHahaha. I'm a sucker!
- Semaphor 6y agoI’m apparently a decently attractive (6.6) 14-year-old (I’m 34). I came closer to the cam, but it didn’t detect me doing it. edit: And my wife actually got recognized despite being black. But it decided she’s ugly (3.4) and has no idea how old she is ;)
- mellowdream 6y agoJust moving my lamp around (i.e., making my face whiter, I'm guessing?) could add 2-3 points. Putting on glasses could do the same. Not sure what to make of this.
- as1mov 6y agoHuh, it seems to rate me 8 out of 10. Only if people in real life shared the same opinion ;_;
- Jaruzel 6y agoNo-one likes a boaster. 7.5/10 here btw. :D
- dag11 6y agoSome fun easter eggs in this. For example, if you click the little EU flag at the bottom, it marks you as "Curious: Yes". Also chuckled when I came closer to the camera when prompted, and it labeled me as a "Good boy"...
- brogrammer2018 6y agoTIL I am ugly. :/
- m1gu3l 6y agoy’all really still wanna play with stuff like this?
- polytely 6y agoI'm in my late twenties but people always think I'm around like 21 or something, I was very surprised to see that this site also guessed that I was about 22, I would expect a computer to see through that.
- adwn 6y ago> I would expect a computer to see through that. If you actually look like you're 21, then how is an AI supposed to "see through that", when all it has is an image of your face?
- mapcars 6y agoYou can't even define normal, how come you think your program can?
- invalidusernam3 6y agoAverage would be a more appropriate word, but that doesn't make for as interesting of a hashtag
- RikNieu 6y agoThat's the point of the website. To show how govs an companies use AI to try and classify you are normal or not.
- unityByFreedom 6y agoWhy the F would anyone on HN want to give their face to a random website.
- infradig 6y agoNot hotdog
- unityByFreedom 6y agoHN: "delete Facebook" Also HN: "show your face to this random site so an algorithm can tell you if you're hot or not"
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]
- Timpy 6y agoWhen they asked for webcam permission I instinctively checked to make sure my webcam was unplugged. Having an algorithm compliment your face is like having a horoscope tell you "You're loyal to fault and you're the kind of person that has tons of friends but you value your closest relationships the most..." etc.
- jeffnv 6y agoIt didn't compliment my face!
- ForHackernews 6y agoI mean, it's an EU-funded academic site designed to raise awareness of privacy issues, so I'm inclined to believe them when they say they aren't keeping any of this data. Maybe it's because programmers tend to think categorically, but I find HN frequently has this problem where people are freaking out like "why is it okay when Mozilla does X but you don't want Google to do X?!" as though we're supposed to treat every question as some sort of sui generis scenario divorced from all history and context. History matters, context matters. I (generally) trust academics and democratically-elected governments, and I (generally) distrust giant ad-tech companies and authoritarian states.
- unityByFreedom 6y agoContext mattering has nothing to do with sharing your face with a random site that claims to be supported by "The EU". This is a site made by one guy, not the EU.
- matthewfelgate 6y agoI'm caught between being fascinated by this technology and horrified at the thought of how much it is in use already.
- gbil 6y agoRead terms? Yes Others: No (88%) hm that is not good at all!
- Jaruzel 6y agoI read the terms, but didn't click the confirmation, and got 'No' as 'Read terms' - so I think it's tracking the confirmation checkbox.
- socialcooling 6y agoActually, the checkbox does nothing. It's just for show :-)
- Jaruzel 6y agoI didn't scroll down on the T&Cs did I ? :)
- danielhua 6y agoCtrl+f'd "terms"...unpleasantly surprised that no one else in the thread seems to have got this result :)
- elktea 6y agoimpossible to use on my iphone
- s_dev 6y ago>"Violently average" .. neither validated nor insulted.
- RikNieu 6y agoMy attractiveness dropped 2 points when I put my glasses on. Interestingly enough no other metrics were affected by wearing glasses.
- TurboHaskal 6y agoWell turns out my grandma wasn't lying.
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]
- greatNespresso 6y agoThat is just awesome, thanks for sharing this ! Forwarded it to all my colleagues and comparing rates just now
- scotty79 6y agoThis app underestimated my age by a decade. I'm flattered. It almost matches with how old I feel I am.
- sktrdie 6y agoYeah the data-gathering-AI-stuff is cool & creepy but I'm actually more interested in the UX of the site. Forget buttons, dialogs, beautifully designed pages. Future UIs should have videos of a person talking telling you what is happening and what to do next!
- Shared404 6y ago> Future UIs should have videos of a person talking telling you what is happening and what to do next! Only if those who want to can turn it off and get text. It works in this context, but most contexts I'm going to guess it would be more rather than less frustrating.
- cblconfederate 6y ago"person", I mean for all we know the guy could have been a deepfake
- nemacol 6y agoI did it twice. Once with the internal camera in my laptop (Lenovo Carbon X1 Extreme sport 4x4 Cargo edition) Received a 67%. Second time with an external Logitech HD 1080p Received a 83%. I am apparently much more attractive and much thinner in HD.
- puranjay 6y agoIf I wanted to be told that I'm ugly, old and fat, I would have just asked my siblings
- Markoff 6y agotop left switch to front camera didn't work in my chromium browser on Android beauty 6-8 BMI very vague 19-25 anyone could guess it says i lied about age because I chose the two year higher instead of 3 years younger
- brushfoot 6y agoI pointed my camera at my monitor and brought up conventionally attractive celebrities. No one got higher than 6.2. Zac Efron: 6.2 Henry Cavill: 5.9 Pierce Brosnan: 5.1 Shemar Moore: 4.7
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]
- cblconfederate 6y agoWell then that's comforting (for me)
- s_dev 6y agoI got 6.9 (7.0 without glasses) -- definitely not more attractive than any of those guys. Even my mother would say Henry Cavill is considerably more attractive than me without batting an eyelid. I would imagine there is some sort of penalty given the face is on a 2D surface.
- Falling3 6y agoWell Henry Cavill is a pretty high bar to be fair.
- frodetb 6y agoSince your screen is most likely flat, you'd have to hold the camera directed straight at it and at a bit of a distance in order for their face not to get distorted by perspective. Even a slight angle would make it appear to the algorithm that they have too big of a forehead/chin, or an asymmetric face (otherwise known as a 5/10).
- sebmellen 6y agoMy 6.7 really shines in comparison... Maybe I should take up acting
- xondono 6y agoI guess I should apply to some modelling jobs with my 9.4 then!
- nashadelic 6y agoThe whole walkthrough was very incredibly well done
- caballeto 6y agoI got 7.9 for beauty index which was pretty surprising. I wonder what is the exact average over the whole sample? And who got the 8+ marks? The distribution would definitely be interesting to see.
- Leherenn 6y agoI was around 5, repositioned my webcam because it/my face was askew, and I shot up to 8.7! While I am flattered, experience certainly does not match that number. On the other hand, my life expectancy is in the 60's, despite having a normal BMI.
- caballeto 6y agoI had same experience with life expectancy. I think the major factor in it is country of origin.
- therealdrag0 6y agoI guess you're not actually asking, but I got 9.3.
- vitorbaptistaa 6y agoEven though they say the range is 0-10, I got 10.1 the first time, and 8.7 the second. People say I look like Jesus (the "Europeanized" version).
- snsr 6y agoGross.
- cblconfederate 6y agoSo then the issue is who has this data, because algorithms are increasingly becoming commodity. Right now the biggest databases are superpowers, big tech , and ordinary countries. One way to remove the competitive advantage of any good or bad actor, is to make the data commonplace, in order to render it worthless, in order to remove the incentive for so much spying.
- black_puppydog 6y agoNot sure if you're being sarcastic, but this reads to me like "if surveillance doesn't produce a worthwhile society, you're just not using enough of it."
- cblconfederate 6y agoHonestly , i think it's going to get worse before it gets better. People don't see the invisible hand of surveillance at the moment , so they don't push back.
- JoeAltmaier 6y agoWas that a hoax? It started showing me pictures of dogs in shower caps for some reason, said it was loading and unloading random data sets, then began quizzing me about random things.
- socialcooling 6y agoCreator here. It sounds like the main face detection algorithm (faceApiJS) wasn't able to load somehow. Then it will just try to keep you entertained by spouting funny loading sentences. Try refreshing the page, or using a different browser.
- daliusd 6y agoBTW site crashes on Firefox.
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]
- abendy 6y agoThis says I look 15 years younger (thanks) and am '50% Normal ' (thanks?)
- krebs_liebhaber 6y agoI was able to increase my attractiveness from 6 to 8 just by doing the Kubrick Stare. Is this what women really want?
- hairofadog 6y agoWhen I saw the headline I thought maybe it was an essay about how to think about your own mental state, which would have been super interesting to me – I'm desperate to know whether the little goblins running around in my head are part of the human condition or are my own customized baggage – but alas, they juts wanna tell me if I'm hot, which I already know the answer to. I didn't give it access to my camera but it sounds like it's giving "attractiveness" ratings, but jeez, that's super complex. I imagine this thing is measuring symmetry and proportion, but that'll only get you so far; the "hottest" A-list actors usually have a kind of wabi-sabi quality, with oversized teeth, or an interestingly shaped nose, or a crooked smile. There are also obviously all kinds of attractive, and emotional baggage that factors into what's attractive to people (they're reminded of a parent or childhood crush, etc.) The most interesting attractiveness-measurer I ever saw was a subreddit where you'd post your own photo, and members of the community would post photos of people who are equal to your own attractiveness, so it effectively threw ego out of the equation.
- indiv0 6y agoDo you remember the name of that subreddit, by any chance?
- sundarurfriend 6y ago/r/EqualAttraction seems to be it (I just searched for 'similar attractiveness' on reddit, was the third or fourth result). Now my problem is I don't know any of the celebrities they are naming, so I'll have to google around to see if I agree with the commenters.
- hairofadog 6y agoI'm pretty sure that was it – when I saw it years ago, there were a few posts that were pretty remarkable, in that somebody "average" looking had uploaded a picture, and someone else would upload a pretty good (non-celeb) match, and in most cases the op would say, "Oh, that's way better than I thought!" Looking at it now, however, it seems like it's mostly a "what celeb do I vaguely resemble" thread, which isn't nearly as interesting.
- ainiriand 6y agoNice! 8.5 attractive and looking 10 years younger. Time to ask for a raise at my company! Oh wait!
- gnulinux 6y ago4/10. I mean I knew I was ugly but still didn't feel good.
- bergstromm466 6y ago> Access to your camera is necessary, but no personal data is collected. suuuuuuuure
- cpufry 6y agoit said i was an uggo =[
- lawlessone 6y agoThat life expectancy feature scared the crap out of me until i realized it thought i was in Russia..
- MetaDark 6y agoI was surprised to see without wearing any makeup that it was 93% sure I'm a woman, considering that I'm a trans woman. Although, it did say I'm 16 with a BMI of 18.3, which is a huge undershot. There's no way I lost 45 pounds since I last weighed myself.
- Digit-Al 6y agoIt guessed my age as 15 years younger than I actually am and then accused me of lying about my age. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
- semicolonandson 6y agoWell that was an unexpected compliment — thanks to a bug in the algorithm I got 11.2.
- throwawaylol20k 6y agoIt gave me 30 years minimum, while I'm not yet 22 :-D
- shannifin 6y agoI'm sad and ugly :(
- atiredturte 6y agoI somehow managed to get an 11 for the attractiveness. I could take it as a huge compliment, but I'm quite sure there was a bug
- dnchu 6y agoI am Mr.MomsPrecious1... I'm not sure if I should feel insulted....